Too Warm: Ford Recalls Nearly 900,000 F-150s Over Block Heater Fault

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Harnessing the magic of electricity to keep your engine block toasty is a better option than crossing your fingers and saying a silent prayer before turning the key (or pressing the button) on cold mornings. Unfortunately for Ford F-150 owners living in northern climes, the block heater residing beneath their truck’s hood might pose a danger to their vehicle — and perhaps their house.

Hoping to remedy a fire risk, Ford Motor Company has issued a recall on roughly 874,000 late-model F-150s in North America.

The recall covers F-150s from the 2015 to 2019 model years, as well as Super Duty models from the 2017 to 2019 model years. Not surprisingly, Canada sees a significant share of the recalled block heater-equipped vehicles — 463,793 in that frigid country, with the remaining 410,289 located in the United States and federal territories. Of these vehicles, Ford estimates 6 percent have the defect.

For owners, the risk only exists when the vehicle’s plugged in. The recall notice states that “water and corrosive contaminant intrusion into the block heater cable’s splice connector could cause corrosion and damage to the connector. Prolonged corrosion in the cable splice connector can cause a resistive short, inoperative engine block heater, and/or tripping of household breakers or GFCI equipped outlets while the vehicle is parked and the block heater is plugged in.”

Certain factors increase the likelihood of a resistive short, including the angle of the connection, its location, and duration of exposure to road salt. A resistive short, as Ford says, “can increase the risk of overheated or melted wiring and fire.”

Trucks built before and after the recalled batch have either grease applied to the splice connector or a different routing for the cables and orientation of the connector. The manufacturer says cables on recalled vehicles will be examined for signs of damage or corrosion; if everything looks fine, dealers will apply dielectric grease to the connections. Owner notification begins January 7th.

The automaker says it’s aware of three fires caused by the defect, with “minor property damage” reported in another incident. Owners of trucks with corroded connectors face a number of tell-tale signs. According to the automaker, the “block heater may become inoperative, the household breaker or outlet GFCI may trip, the user may hear buzzing or sizzling noise, or observe smoke and/or sparks when the cable is plugged into a wall outlet.”

Ford claims the afflicted half-tons rolled out of the company’s Dearborn Truck Plant between March 18, 2014 and November 17, 2018, while Kansas City Assembly built its share of the tally from August 21st, 2014 to November 17th, 2018. Recalled Super Duty trucks left Ohio Assembly between February 5th, 2016 and November 17th, 2018, and the automaker’s Kentucky Truck Plant from October 8th, 2015, to November 17th, 2018.

If your truck’s suddenly causing you a bit of worry, Ford is reachable at 1-866-436-7332. The reference number for this recall is 18S45.

[Image: Ford Motor Company]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 37 comments
  • Redapple2 jeffbut they dont want to ... their pick up is 4th behind ford/ram, Toyota. GM has the Best engineers in the world. More truck profit than the other 3. Silverado + Sierra+ Tahoe + Yukon sales = 2x ford total @ $15,000 profit per. Tons o $ to invest in the BEST truck. No. They make crap. Garbage. Evil gm Vampire
  • Rishabh Ive actually seen the one unit you mentioned, driving around in gurugram once. And thats why i got curious to know more about how many they sold. Seems like i saw the only one!
  • Amy I owned this exact car from 16 until 19 (1990 to 1993) I miss this car immensely and am on the search to own it again, although it looks like my search may be in vane. It was affectionatly dubbed, " The Dragon Wagon," and hauled many a teenager around the city of Charlotte, NC. For me, it was dependable and trustworthy. I was able to do much of the maintenance myself until I was struck by lightning and a month later the battery exploded. My parents did have the entire electrical system redone and he was back to new. I hope to find one in the near future and make it my every day driver. I'm a dreamer.
  • Jeff Overall I prefer the 59 GM cars to the 58s because of less chrome but I have a new appreciation of the 58 Cadillac Eldorados after reading this series. I use to not like the 58 Eldorados but I now don't mind them. Overall I prefer the 55-57s GMs over most of the 58-60s GMs. For the most part I like the 61 GMs. Chryslers I like the 57 and 58s. Fords I liked the 55 thru 57s but the 58s and 59s not as much with the exception of Mercury which I for the most part like all those. As the 60s progressed the tail fins started to go away and the amount of chrome was reduced. More understated.
  • Theflyersfan Nissan could have the best auto lineup of any carmaker (they don't), but until they improve one major issue, the best cars out there won't matter. That is the dealership experience. Year after year in multiple customer service surveys from groups like JD Power and CR, Nissan frequency scrapes the bottom. Personally, I really like the never seen new Z, but after having several truly awful Nissan dealer experiences, my shadow will never darken a Nissan showroom. I'm painting with broad strokes here, but maybe it is so ingrained in their culture to try to take advantage of people who might not be savvy enough in the buying experience that they by default treat everyone like idiots and saps. All of this has to be frustrating to Nissan HQ as they are improving their lineup but their dealers drag them down.
Next