QOTD: Two Trucks, Once Choice

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Advice time. My friend wants (though she might say “needs”) a truck, and the choice is narrowed down to two prospects, each competing for midsize pickup supremacy.

Can you help her make a decision?

I’ve known this friend, whom I’ve mentioned in the past, since Grade 4, so you’d best treat her well. Having just given birth to her first child, days and nights are long, and periods of sleep are excruciatingly short for this new mother. I don’t know how they do it. My parenting abilities fall short of a potted houseplant.

Anyway, after the joyous arrival, my friend discovered, to her dismay, that her Mazda CX-3 — a vehicle she quickly grew ambivalent of — proved to be too small for the simple task of carrying two normal-sized adults and an infant in a child seat. Stuffing the loung lady in the backseat requires a forward positioning of the front seats, apparently, and this just won’t do. Maybe a subcompact crossover can be too compact?

Given that the family’s other vehicle is a previous-generation Ford F-150 crew cab 4×4, the possibility of a second truck in the driveway looms large. However, going full-size for the second vehicle seems like overkill. While she’s in a rural area where big trucks rule the roads, she’d prefer slightly easier parking lot maneuvering and an extra MPG or two.

It comes down to two very familiar choices: A Toyota Tacoma or Chevrolet Colorado, in crew cab/V6/automatic guise. One can’t be built fast enough and holds its resale value, the other is the Colorado, which sells in very healthy numbers. The Colorado is newer, overall, and could be had for a lower MSRP. In terms of power, both trucks don’t disappoint, though the Tacoma slightly edges the Colorado in terms of fuel economy (20 mpg combined vs. 19 mpg), while the Colorado has a slight leg up in torque. “Slight” seems to be the word of the day here. Keep in mind that towing and payload capacity are not considerations here.

Safety’s a top priority, for obvious reasons, but both the crew cab Colorado and its Tacoma rival boast “good” IIHS ratings in all crash tests. Headlight performance for both are dim, pardon the pun.

So, B&B, which of these closely matched vehicles should my friend buy — the Tacoma, or the $2,800 cheaper Colorado LT? Or, should she save her loonies and just get into a larger crossover?

[Images: General Motors, Toyota]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 166 comments
  • Mackey Mackey on Nov 21, 2018

    If a body on frame truck already exists, I think the Honda Ridgeline absolutely needs to be at the top of the list. It offers greater efficiency, AWD, excellent ride and accommodations, and features that make it far more flexible than the standard mid-sized trucks, unless heavy off-road needs exist. The cabin is larger and more flexible, the in bed trunk is a game changer (see and use one for yourself), and the dual-action tailgate isn't just a gimmick. Yes- I own one- I am a life long 'truck guy', but can confidently say that the current Honda Ridgeline is all the truck that 70+% of truck buyers would ever need, but will never admit (save for construction crews, heavy tow needs, etc).

  • Lou_BC Lou_BC on Nov 21, 2018

    All these recommendations but the choice is between a Colorado or Tacoma. Tacoma no longer has any durability edge over the Colorado. The engine in the Tacoma has been much maligned. Drum brakes are still on the back of the Tacoma. The Colorado has a nicer and much more comfortable interior along with a better ride. Tacoma has better resale but the Colorado can be found at a better price. I personally would buy the Colorado. They didn't say trim... how about a diesel ZR2 in deep forest green ;) Sorry, that,s my favourite but a Colorado would be my recommendation.

    • See 1 previous
    • Big Al from Oz Big Al from Oz on Nov 22, 2018

      @Big Al from Oz Oh, I should have typed 33mpg for the Nissan Navara 2.3 diesel.

  • Redapple2 jeffbut they dont want to ... their pick up is 4th behind ford/ram, Toyota. GM has the Best engineers in the world. More truck profit than the other 3. Silverado + Sierra+ Tahoe + Yukon sales = 2x ford total @ $15,000 profit per. Tons o $ to invest in the BEST truck. No. They make crap. Garbage. Evil gm Vampire
  • Rishabh Ive actually seen the one unit you mentioned, driving around in gurugram once. And thats why i got curious to know more about how many they sold. Seems like i saw the only one!
  • Amy I owned this exact car from 16 until 19 (1990 to 1993) I miss this car immensely and am on the search to own it again, although it looks like my search may be in vane. It was affectionatly dubbed, " The Dragon Wagon," and hauled many a teenager around the city of Charlotte, NC. For me, it was dependable and trustworthy. I was able to do much of the maintenance myself until I was struck by lightning and a month later the battery exploded. My parents did have the entire electrical system redone and he was back to new. I hope to find one in the near future and make it my every day driver. I'm a dreamer.
  • Jeff Overall I prefer the 59 GM cars to the 58s because of less chrome but I have a new appreciation of the 58 Cadillac Eldorados after reading this series. I use to not like the 58 Eldorados but I now don't mind them. Overall I prefer the 55-57s GMs over most of the 58-60s GMs. For the most part I like the 61 GMs. Chryslers I like the 57 and 58s. Fords I liked the 55 thru 57s but the 58s and 59s not as much with the exception of Mercury which I for the most part like all those. As the 60s progressed the tail fins started to go away and the amount of chrome was reduced. More understated.
  • Theflyersfan Nissan could have the best auto lineup of any carmaker (they don't), but until they improve one major issue, the best cars out there won't matter. That is the dealership experience. Year after year in multiple customer service surveys from groups like JD Power and CR, Nissan frequency scrapes the bottom. Personally, I really like the never seen new Z, but after having several truly awful Nissan dealer experiences, my shadow will never darken a Nissan showroom. I'm painting with broad strokes here, but maybe it is so ingrained in their culture to try to take advantage of people who might not be savvy enough in the buying experience that they by default treat everyone like idiots and saps. All of this has to be frustrating to Nissan HQ as they are improving their lineup but their dealers drag them down.
Next