BMW Buying Out Brilliance Automotive in China, Adding Capacity for U.S.

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Now that China has relaxed its joint-ownership mandates, BMW has announced that it will procure a majority stake in its venture with Brilliance Automotive. The German firm will be the first foreign automaker to have majority control of its business in the region.

Being first will not come cheaply, however. It will cost BMW $4.2 billion to assume control with a majority stake of 75 percent of the business — albeit as part of a larger deal. All the manufacturer has to do is come up with the funds and wait until 2022, when rules limiting foreign ownership for all Chinese auto ventures are officially lifted.

BMW has said that both partners have signed a corresponding agreement, but noted that the transaction is still subject to the approval of the relevant authorities and the consent of the Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Ltd Shareholders’ Meeting.

The plan also extends the cooperative contract that makes BMW Brilliance Automotive (BBA) possible through 2040 and includes investments into new and existing plant structures in Shenyang (where Brilliance is currently headquartered) over the coming years. At least one new facility is expected following the deal’s ratification, with additional cash going into modernizing older factories.

“We are now embarking on a new era,” BMW CEO Harald Krueger said during the plan’s announcement. According to Reuters, he also thanked Chinese Premier Li Keqiang, whom he said “personally supported” the arrangement.

With both the United States and China looking as if they are going to continue escalating auto tariffs against each other, The People’s Republic may have been left with little recourse. It’s already procured access to Western tech and secured longterm investments since becoming the world’s largest auto market. Foreign automakers have also wanted more control of Chinese operations ever since they started doing business within the country.

Everyone expects other manufacturers to follow suit. Daimler boss Dieter Zetsche told Reuters last week that signals from the Chinese authorities were encouraging. However, Dr. Z noted that Mercedes-Benz did not yet have legal permission to make any financial moves that would allow it to buy out BAIC Motor and take majority control of Beijing Benz.

“If we do, we need to see what opportunities there are,” Zetsche said at the Paris Motor Show.

Such an arrangement is also likely to help automakers cope with China’s dwindling demand for luxury vehicles. BMW has been among the hardest hit, since it ships its most popular SUVs from its U.S. plant in Spartanburg to China. Those vehicles have been subjected to several suspicious “customs investigations” and slapped with exceptionally high retaliatory tariffs.

“[The] number one reason why we invest in China is because we are absolutely convinced the market has a further growth potential,” explained BMW finance chief Nicolas Peter. He also said the company would be investing in extra capacity for the United States, which is not considered a growth market.

Our hot take? The trade war has made it so that it only pays to build where you sell.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 6 comments
  • ToolGuy This thing here is interesting.For example, I can select "Historical" and "EV stock" and "Cars" and "USA" and see how many BEVs and PHEVs were on U.S. roads from 2010 to 2023."EV stock share" is also interesting. Or perhaps you prefer "EV sales share".If you are in the U.S., whatever you do, do not select "World" in the 'Region' dropdown. It might blow your small insular mind. 😉
  • ToolGuy This podcast was pretty interesting. I listened to it this morning, and now I am commenting. Listened to the podcast, now commenting on the podcast. See how this works? LOL.
  • VoGhost If you want this to succeed, enlarge the battery and make the vehicle in Spartanburg so you buyers get the $7,500 discount.
  • Jeff Look at the the 65 and 66 Pontiacs some of the most beautiful and well made Pontiacs. 66 Olds Toronado and 67 Cadillac Eldorado were beautiful as well. Mercury had some really nice looking cars during the 60s as well. The 69 thru 72 Grand Prix were nice along with the first generation of Monte Carlo 70 thru 72. Midsize GM cars were nice as well.The 69s were still good but the cheapening started in 68. Even the 70s GMs were good but fit and finish took a dive especially the interiors with more plastics and more shared interiors.
  • Proud2BUnion I typically recommend that no matter what make or model you purchase used, just assure that is HAS a prior salvage/rebuilt title. Best "Bang for your buck"!
Next