Tesla to Suppliers: Take a Hit to Make Us Great
Agreements forged between automakers and suppliers aren’t etched in stone, and shaky financial ground has a way of altering how and when those suppliers are paid. Look back to the recession for prime examples of that.
However, a memo sent from Tesla to a supplier shows the electric automaker wants to recoup a portion of its previously spent cash — a request designed to help Tesla finally turn a profit.
The memo, reviewed by The Wall Street Journal, asks the supplier to return a “meaningful” amount of money paid out since 2016. Other suppliers will be asked the same thing, the memo states. With the automaker aiming for a positive cash flow in the second half of this year, asking suppliers to return some of the money they’ve been paid would help it reach its goal, assuming they comply.
The WSJ report doesn’t mention how many suppliers received the request. Tesla’s supply chain partners include, among others, Panasonic, Magna, and Robert Bosch GmbH.
Asking for a refund isn’t the only way Tesla’s attempting to firm up its financial footing. At the end of June, the automaker opened orders to all Model 3 reservation holders (minus those waiting for the much-ballyhooed $35,000 base model) in the U.S. and Canada. Having already paid a $1,000 reservation fee, these would-be buyers were asked to pay $2,500 to confirm their order. Standard practice, Tesla says.
What’s not standard practice is demanding a retroactive price reduction on past work. From time to time, automakers might negotiate for a price reduction on a current contract, but the savings would only be realized on future work.
Via Twitter, Tesla CEO Elon Musk said, “Only costs that actually apply to Q3 & beyond will be counted. It would not be correct to apply historical cost savings to current quarter.”
As you’d expect, many see the memo as a sign of serious trouble. Just how depleted is the company’s cash situation, and how will this impact the company’s attempt to ramp up Model 3 production? “It’s simply ludicrous and it just shows that Tesla is desperate right now,” manufacturing consultant Dennis Virag told the Associated Press (via The Los Angeles Times).
Of course, if certain suppliers are beholden to Tesla for their own futures, complying with the request won’t be a difficult decision.
[Image: Tesla]
More by Steph Willems
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- Jalop1991 This is easy. The CX-5 is gawdawful uncomfortable.
- Aaron This is literally my junkyard for my 2001 Chevy Tracker, 1998 Volvo S70, and 2002 Toyota Camry. Glad you could visit!
- Lou_BC Let me see. Humans are fallible. They can be very greedy. Politicians sell to the highest bidder. What could go wrong?
- SPPPP Vibrant color 9 times out of 10 for me. There may be a few shapes that look just right in metallic gray, for example. There are a few nices ones out there. And I like VW "White Silver". But I'd usually prefer a deep red or a vibrant metallic green. Or a bright blue.
- 28-Cars-Later Say it ain't so, so reboot #6* isn't going to change anything?[list=1][*]V4-6-8 and High "Tech" 4100.[/*][*]Front wheel drive sooooo modern.[/*][*]NOrthSTARt.[/*][*]Catera wooooo.[/*][*]ATS all the things.[/*][*]We're *are* your daddy's Tesla. [/*][/list=1]
Comments
Join the conversation
I'd not heard about the massive vehicle numbers in storage, but my take would be they all need rework/repair before being ready to ship. Even the brilliant folks at Musk Motors sometimes can't fix all the problems with an over the air software update. There's no other reason Musk would hold back from collecting $$$$ from the customers at delivery.
oh please. Nissan, VW, GM, and even almighty Toyota have all pulled variations on this, squeezing suppliers one way or another. When it happens at an established automaker, it's "All hail Le Costcutter!" When it happens at Tesla, the trolls emerge from under their soot-caked bridges to chant "Ponzi!" I'm sure that being a then-new automaker, Tesla years ago had to agree to unfavorable terms to get parts suppliers to risk working with them. Now that they're finally meeting their production targets for a model with massive orders, it's not totally crazy if they'd like a bit of the coming windfall back, especially since they've been clear with everyone that the Model 3 is their make-or-break product. What's the evidence of this alleged backlog of cars? And who says it means anything in particular? GM had a big-ass yard of Bolts when the model was new too. I'd guess it has more to do with inspections, some rework, and batching cars to ship them to similar destinations economically, but I don't know, and neither do any of the other commenters on here. Given that the government of China has declared world leadership in electric cars a strategic priority, you'd better pray that Tesla survives as an independent American company, because the alternative isn't bankruptcy and no more pressure on legacy automakers to innovate (change is haaaard!), it's Chinese ownership and America surrendering its technology lead in YET ANOTHER industry, and that would be just plain dumb.