Ford EcoSport Continues Its Search for a Sales Ceiling

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

If the Ford EcoSport was Elon Musk, there’d be a special online site created to champion the tarring and feathering of the writers at this publication. While we’re in agreement that the subcompact crossover space is a much-needed segment for Ford, especially given its plan to ditch conventional passenger cars, we question the automaker’s decision to bring the EcoSport here.

One of our readers wasn’t too thrilled with his experience behind the wheel, but we’ll all reserve final judgement until after we spend a week in one. There’s further reviews on the way. (Maybe it’ll hack our lives and our emotions.)

Having said that, the EcoSport, which saw its first ever U.S. deliveries in January, sees its monthly sales continue to climb. Much to the chagrin of a certain PEI resident, it seems Americans have taken to the thing.

Last month, Ford moved 5,481 examples of the little Indian-built vehicle in the United States, beating the subcompact Fiesta’s tally of 5,110 units. Note that Fiesta sales grew 22 percent, year over year, last March. And yet the less-expensive vehicle was still trounced, if marginally, by the EcoSport’s volume. Maybe Ford’s on to something here…

Putting that figure into context, the EcoSport outsold the Toyota C-HR (4,366 sales in May), the Mazda CX-3 (1,823 sales), and the equally new Hyundai Kona, which recorded 5,079 deliveries last month. Chevrolet Trax sales figures remain a mystery (thanks, GM!), but the monthly average for 2017 works out to roughly 6,600 vehicles, and the first quarter of 2018 isn’t far off that mark. Still, the only subcompact offering that can legitimately claim to have beaten the EcoSport is the perennially popular Honda HR-V, which recorded 8,773 sales in May.

One month in the auto industry doesn’t count for much, and it remains to be seen where the EcoSport plateaus — and for how long it can sustain its sales compared to the competition. Already, we’re seeing more incentives pile up the little ute’s hood. In the Detroit area, for example, there’s up to $5,000 waiting for existing FoMoCo owners with good credit who finance through Ford.

Two grand in customer cash seems to be a country-wide offer on the EcoSport, along with the usual college, military, and first responder bonuses.

Soon, however, there’ll be a rival boasting a base MSRP that’s five bucks cheaper than an entry-level EcoSport with $2k in customer cash hiding in the glovebox. That model is the front-drive-only Nissan Kicks.

[Image: Ford Motor Company]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 55 comments
  • "scarey" "scarey" on Jun 13, 2018

    Let's see- Ford is replacing the Taurus, the Focus, the Fiesta and the Fusion for an Indian pile'o'crap ? Is Ford trying to sell us a third-world Yugo SUV ? All I can say is that the QUALITY had better be top rate. If it isn't, Ford Death Watch is coming. I remember when Ford said "Quality is Job One.". This says "Quality is Dead".

  • Akear Akear on Jun 15, 2018

    Ford's stock is still the lowest of all the major car companies. When your stock is under 12.USD you know things are bad. Ford - what a disgrace!

  • Analoggrotto I don't see a red car here, how blazing stupid are you people?
  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Off-road fluff on vehicles that should not be off road needs to die.
Next