Ace of Base: 2019 Ford Ranger XL 4×2

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

Look at the truck shown above. Blacked-out grille and bumpers, old-school phone dial steel wheels of a reasonable size, and an honest, hardworking cleat system on the outside of the bed. I’d drive it and I’m pretty sure you would, too. Raise your hand if I’m correct.

Hear that Ford? Approximately 100 percent of the American public TTAC readers would sign the note on a base model Ranger. The SuperCrews you showed us in January were a good start, now stop teasing us with overseas mini-Raptors and please whip up a base model.

Keeping with Ford’s naming tradition, I’m dubbing this the Ranger XL.

The truck you see here is Thailand-spec, one which is physically in the ballpark of what we’ll get in this country when the Ranger appears later this year, perhaps around Thanksgiving. In January, the company showed us XLT and Lariat trims jazzed up with an FX4 package.

Prices for the base Ranger start at 559,000 of the finest Thai Bhats, equalling approximately $17,900 American dollars at today’s exchange rate. That’s squarely in the wheelhouse of other base model midsizers already on sale in these parts, such at the Colorado. If Ford can translate the Ranger’s Monroney as well as we hope it translate its styling, it’s gonna give the establishment a run for its money.

Air conditioning and a barrel of places in which to charge devices are standard in the base Ranger, as is Bluetooth connectivity. Sticky vinyl covers the bench seat. When the truck reaches our shores, it’ll likely include other features like a backup camera and cloth buckets. I also spy a sliding rear window.

It’s best to ignore the engine choices offered overseas, as those two diesel engines will likely be lost in translation. Ford’s already confirmed the 2.3-liter EcoBoost; the F-150’s 2.7-liter V6 would be wonderful.

The chances of a standard cab as shown here is slim, as OEMs ‘round these parts would much rather hawk higher-margin SuperCrews loaded to the gills with options. Can’t hurt to dream, though, and it is my opinion that there is more of a market for stripped-out base trucks than manufacturers might think.

Witness the proliferation of little kei trucks being used by hardworking farm hands who don’t necessarily need to fire up the Super Duty every time they go to town, for example. These regular cab base trucks might be low-margin, but I maintain there is some demand. Will we ever see one again? Probably not.

And if all that’s not good enough for ya, check out the base model flatbed. It costs about $500 more than the base Ranger, bins the audio system, and adds rear disc brakes. The suspension is fundamentally different, too, trading ox-cart leaf springs for coils and a Watt’s linkage.

An educated guess puts the new Ranger in American showrooms around the time we’re carving turkey for this year’s Thanksgiving dinner. History (and my stint at a Ford store 15 years ago) teaches me dealers will start taking orders about three months prior to that date.

Will there be an Ace of Base model? We can only hope.

[Images: Ford Motor Company]

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 116 comments
  • Jeff S Jeff S on Mar 29, 2018

    I would buy one of these regardless of the ride quality. Perfect sized trucks for Home Depot and utilitarian purposes. Price this truck at 17k with a manual and few options and I would buy it. I also like the tires with the bigger sidewalls that are more durable and don't blow out as easy. Just having a bigger traditional sidewall would give it a better ride.

    • Vulpine Vulpine on Mar 29, 2018

      Yeah. The Americanized version is slightly larger than the Global version from what I've read... more along the size of today's Colorado. My problem now is that the wife and I have started talking (again) about getting a towable RV and my old Ranger doesn't have the power to pull one while the Renegade is only rated to 2000#-2500#. I may be forced to upgrade to larger than I really want and so far my choices look slim. GM screwed the floor of the extended cab with that big, plastic, "storage pocket" seat base and none of the others really make a long-legged driver comfortable behind the wheel (seat doesn't move back far enough.) I certainly don't need OR want a full second row; the only passenger back there ever will be a 50# dog (assuming I can get him to even try to jump up there, considering how tall 4x4 trucks have become. Heck, dog already has trouble jumping into the cab of my 4x2 '97 Ranger!) I'm waiting for a first-hand view of the new Ranger before I make any decisions and keep my eyes open for something as useful but smaller than the others.

  • Jeff S Jeff S on Apr 01, 2018

    @Vulpine--Agree about the floor of the extended cab Base Colorado. The extended Colorado might be the closest truck to what you need and want except maybe the new Ranger. I don't know if you could realistically go smaller than an extended cab midsize truck especially since you plan on getting a tow able RV. Any smaller then you probably won't be able to tow. r

    • Vulpine Vulpine on Apr 01, 2018

      Like I said, Jeff, I'm at least considering the Ranger. Ford's full-sized extended cabs have a relatively clean floor; I hope they do the same for the Ranger.

  • Slavuta Motor Trend"Although the interior appears more upscale, sit in it a while and you notice the grainy plastics and conventional design. The doors sound tinny, the small strip of buttons in the center stack flexes, and the rear seats are on the firm side (but we dig the ability to recline). Most frustrating were the repeated Apple CarPlay glitches that seemed to slow down the apps running through it."
  • Brandon I would vote for my 23 Escape ST-Line with the 2.0L turbo and a normal 8 speed transmission instead of CVT. 250 HP, I average 28 MPG and get much higher on trips and get a nice 13" sync4 touchscreen. It leaves these 2 in my dust literally
  • JLGOLDEN When this and Hornet were revealed, I expected BOTH to quickly become best-sellers for their brands. They look great, and seem like interesting and fun alternatives in a crowded market. Alas, ambitious pricing is a bridge too far...
  • Zerofoo Modifications are funny things. I like the smoked side marker look - however having seen too many cars with butchered wire harnesses, I don't buy cars with ANY modifications. Pro-tip - put the car back to stock before you try and sell it.
  • JLGOLDEN I disagree with the author's comment on the current Murano's "annoying CVT". Murano's CVT does not fake shifts like some CVTs attempt, therefore does not cause shift shock or driveline harshness while fumbling between set ratios. Murano's CVT feels genuinely smooth and lets the (great-sounding V6) engine sing and zing along pleasantly.
Next