Decision on Fiat 500-based Jeep Model Looms

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

The emergence of Jeep as a global brand with lofty sales ambitions means satisfying everyone, everywhere, no matter what the location or income of the would-be buyer. While Fiat Chrysler feels there’s definitely room to go bigger and pricier in the United States (we’re still waiting on that six-figure Grand Wagoneer), there’s also a desire to go smaller in overseas markets.

We’re talking sub-Renegade. And it just so happens Jeep has access to the platform underpinning the tiny Fiat 500 city car and plucky/adorable Fiat Panda that would make just such a model possible.

The question for Jeep is: does it really want to go there?


According to Automotive News, FCA’s off-road division is seriously considering a baby Jeep model. Brand boss Mike Manley said the brand is looking “very closely” at a sub-Renegade for European customers and other overseas buyers — a model that would remain off limits to space-hungry American buyers who enjoy stretching out in their vehicles.

Supplier sources claim Jeep’s discussions began early last year, with an Italian newspaper stating FCA’s Panda-building Pomigliano, Italy plant might serve as the production site. Such a vehicle, built on Fiat’s Mini platform, would stretch just a hair over 13 feet from stem to stern, it claimed. In contrast, a diminutive Fiat 500 spans just 11.6 feet.

There’ll soon be space at the Italian plant, too, as next-generation Panda production ships off to Poland.

While it’s possible company execs fear a baby model could water down the brand’s image, it’s far more likely that issues related to product development has kept the hypothetical model from receiving the green light. Manley said last year that any new Jeep will “still have to be capable” off-road.

Whatever the decision, we’ll probably see it show up in FCA’s five-year product plan, set for release in June.

[Image: Fiat Chrysler Automobiles]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 59 comments
  • Pete Zaitcev Pete Zaitcev on Jan 25, 2018

    I, for one, would give a sub-Renegade Jeep a serious consideration. I looked at the Renegade, and liked most of its attributes except how large it is. The "smallest" Jeep is actually larger than 2D Wrangler, although it is somewhat lighter. If I'm buying a car this big, I might as well buy Wrangler. If they can make something of Mazda CX-3 sized, but with a low gear, I will be seriously tempted to ditch the Wrangler. Now, I must admit that a FIAT 500 sized SUV might be just a little bit too small, but the article says that they want to make it a little longer, which would be perfect.

  • Mattwc1 Mattwc1 on Jan 25, 2018

    For FCA, it benefits them to increase the branding of Jeep. This will come at the expense of the loyalists but Jeep is the cash cow that keeps on giving. I remember when the Patriot/Compass twins came out and despite the loyalists complaints, the Wrangler continued to sell well. Chrysler had 2 models to sell to buyers with a lower barrier of entry to get into the Jeep brand. Fleet sales and cash on the hood(I see leftover Patriots/Compasses on the lots (6speed auto/2.4/awd) with serious cash on the hood. Probably 15-16k for potential buyers) Despite that fact that these models were/are outdated to the competition means little when they still sold in decent numbers until they were replaced. For FCA, the new Compass, Grand Cherokee, and Renegade bring a lot of buyers into the dealerships. The fact that these models even have a tangential relationship to the Wrangler is a PR bonus. The new sub-Renegade model will do further to help sales. FCA is reliant on Jeep to prop up the company.

  • Theflyersfan Honda, Toyota, Nissan, Hyundai, and Kia still don't seem to have a problem moving sedans off of the lot. I also see more than a few new 3-series, C-classes and A4s as well showing the Germans can sell the expensive ones. Sales might be down compared to 10-15 years ago, but hundreds of thousands of sales in the US alone isn't anything to sneeze at. What we've had is the thinning of the herd. The crap sedans have exited stage left. And GM has let the Malibu sit and rot on the vine for so long that this was bound to happen. And it bears repeating - auto trends go in cycles. Many times the cars purchased by the next generation aren't the ones their parents and grandparents bought. Who's to say that in 10 years, CUVs are going to be seen at that generation's minivans and no one wants to touch them? The Japanese and Koreans will welcome those buyers back to their full lineups while GM, Ford, and whatever remains of what was Chrysler/Dodge will be back in front of Congress pleading poverty.
  • Corey Lewis It's not competitive against others in the class, as my review discussed. https://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/cars/chevrolet/rental-review-the-2023-chevrolet-malibu-last-domestic-midsize-standing-44502760
  • Turbo Is Black Magic My wife had one of these back in 06, did a ton of work to it… supercharger, full exhaust, full suspension.. it was a blast to drive even though it was still hilariously slow. Great for drive in nights, open the hatch fold the seats flat and just relax.Also this thing is a great example of how far we have come in crash safety even since just 2005… go look at these old crash tests now and I cringe at what a modern electric tank would do to this thing.
  • MaintenanceCosts Whenever the topic of the xB comes up…Me: "The style is fun. The combination of the box shape and the aggressive detailing is very JDM."Wife: "Those are ghetto."Me: "They're smaller than a Corolla outside and have the space of a RAV4 inside."Wife: "Those are ghetto."Me: "They're kind of fun to drive with a stick."Wife: "Those are ghetto."It's one of a few cars (including its fellow box, the Ford Flex) on which we will just never see eye to eye.
  • Oberkanone The alternative is a more expensive SUV. Yes, it will be missed.
Next