Ford CEO Outlines New Vehicle Development Plan, Shifts Investments, Trims Fat (and Models)

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

After much speculation, Ford CEO Jim Hackett has finally outlined where his company’s dollars will be spent in the foreseeable future. Hackett spent his summer performing what Ford called a “four-month deep dive” into the company’s strategy and business operations to see what changes needed to be made. His conclusions? This may surprise a few readers, but Ford will continue building and selling automobiles.

Alright, that isn’t a bombshell, but the brand is trying to frame itself as the Ford you’ve always trusted while also letting everyone know it’s still a “mobility company” with its eyes fixed on tomorrow. Without the public relations veneer, that plan translates into a reduced number of production models and trims, more money for electrification R&D, less for internal combustion engines, and a significant reduction in material costs.

Hackett’s address also served to reassure the nervous shareholders who ousted his predecessor, Mark Fields. Ford’s stock declined more than 30 percent during Fields’ tenure and many complained that his vision of transitioning from a traditional automaker to a Silicon Valley look-alike was partly to blame. Hackett did everything in his power to ease those fears.

“We’re going to be in the vehicle business moving both people and goods. Some myth about not being in the car business is gone,” Hackett told Wall Street.

Of course, the current CEO is still calling Ford a “mobility company,” which is about as Fieldsian a phrase as we can imagine. So Hackett isn’t abandoning dearly-departed Mark’s vision of the future entirely. He still said the brand will make all of its vehicles smart and connected. Ford is also shifting a third of the company’s internal combustion engine expenditures into electrification.

Other changes include redirecting $7 billion of product development funds from its less popular cars to its more profitable light trucks. That means fewer available models in the future and a ten-fold reduction of orderable combinations. Cars will be the most affected by this. For example: Ford’s Fusion will go from over 35,000 combinations in its current generation only 96 in the next. But the Explorer will only see its available options halved.

As for the nameplates we will lose in the years to come, the company wouldn’t name names. We don’t expect those to be SUVs or pickup trucks. Still, Ford did say higher-revenue subsegments of cars, such as hatchbacks or performance models, may be given preferential treatment. Hackett’s proposals are all about trimming the fat, however, so we wouldn’t hold our breath on Fiestas, Fusions, or Focuses sticking around indefinitely.

The plan also calls for a $10 billion reduction in material costs and $4 billion shaved from engineering expenses over the next five years. The relocation of capital from cars to SUVs and trucks will deliver 13 new electrified vehicle models in that same timeframe. Those models include a F-150 Hybrid, Mustang Hybrid, Transit Custom plug-in hybrid, the Ford Police Responder Hybrid Sedan, an unnamed fully electric small SUV, and whatever autonomous vehicle the company has in the works.

Ford is also looking at how to commodify connectivity and wants to provide Internet connectivity in every one of its vehicles sold in the United States by 2019. It also want to see 90 percent of its global fleet doing the same by 2020. While it’s not certain how the automaker can best profit from the technology, early indications show automakers will likely store personal data to sell to advertisers and/or provide them with in-car personalized marketing opportunities.

However, Hackett knows the core of Ford’s business is automotive. Zeroing in on its long-term goal of an 8 percent operating margin will revolve around production efficiency and sales. Hackett wants investors to know he understands the company’s strength lies in its heritage as an auto company, while underscoring just how modern it will need to be to compete. It’s not altogether different than Field’s vision for the company, but it possesses a less idealistic and more proactive element for dealing with present-day problems.

[Images: Ford Motor Co.]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 62 comments
  • Jerome10 Jerome10 on Oct 04, 2017

    Fusion is poor quality? Consumer Reports rates it 4/5, same as Accord and Mazda6, better than Malibu and Sonata, and behind Camry and Optima. Certainly not anything that sends vibes of "junk" to me. Unfortunately simpler is probably better overall despite enthusiasts liking to tailor to exactly what they want. The fact is that most car buyers wander in off the street with little research, want a car with X, Y, and Z, they run the monthly payments (loan length and interest rates don't matter...only the payment does), and they drive it off the lot. Ford will sell more cars, at higher margins, when consumers can find what they want, on the lot RIGHT NOW, with lower production costs, and before they can go home, do research, and ponder the purchase. Just how it is now. Cars are appliances.

    • See 1 previous
    • Danio3834 Danio3834 on Oct 05, 2017

      @ajla JD Power uses a Problem Per 100 vehicles methodology which is the type of measurement most automakers use. They might dumb it down to smaller denominators in certain publications but that's the core of the data.

  • John John on Oct 05, 2017

    A "mobility company"? So they are going to manufacture electric carts for lazy people to use in WalMart?

  • Alan My view is there are good vehicles from most manufacturers that are worth looking at second hand.I can tell you I don't recommend anything from the Chrysler/Jeep/Fiat/etc gene pool. Toyotas are overly expensive second hand for what they offer, but they seem to be reliable enough.I have a friend who swears by secondhand Subarus and so far he seems to not have had too many issue.As Lou stated many utes, pickups and real SUVs (4x4) seem quite good.
  • 28-Cars-Later So is there some kind of undiagnosed disease where every rando thinks their POS is actually valuable?83K miles Ok.new valve cover gasket.Eh, it happens with age. spark plugsOkay, we probably had to be kewl and put in aftermarket iridium plugs, because EVO.new catalytic converterUh, yeah that's bad at 80Kish. Auto tranny failing. From the ad: the SST fails in one of the following ways:Clutch slip has turned into; multiple codes being thrown, shifting a gear or 2 in manual mode (2-3 or 2-4), and limp mode.Codes include: P2733 P2809 P183D P1871Ok that's really bad. So between this and the cat it suggests to me someone jacked up the car real good hooning it, because EVO, and since its not a Toyota it doesn't respond well to hard abuse over time.$20,000, what? Pesos? Zimbabwe Dollars?Try $2,000 USD pal. You're fracked dude, park it in da hood and leave the keys in it.BONUS: Comment in the ad: GLWS but I highly doubt you get any action on this car what so ever at that price with the SST on its way out. That trans can be $10k + to repair.
  • 28-Cars-Later Actually Honda seems to have a brilliant mid to long term strategy which I can sum up in one word: tariffs.-BEV sales wane in the US, however they will sell in Europe (and sales will probably increase in Canada depending on how their government proceeds). -The EU Politburo and Canada concluded a trade treaty in 2017, and as of 2024 99% of all tariffs have been eliminated.-Trump in 2018 threatened a 25% tariff on European imported cars in the US and such rhetoric would likely come again should there be an actual election. -By building in Canada, product can still be sold in the US tariff free though USMCA/NAFTA II but it should allow Honda tariff free access to European markets.-However if the product were built in Marysville it could end up subject to tit-for-tat tariff depending on which junta is running the US in 2025. -Profitability on BEV has already been a variable to put it mildly, but to take on a 25% tariff to all of your product effectively shuts you out of that market.
  • Lou_BC Actuality a very reasonable question.
  • Lou_BC Peak rocket esthetic in those taillights (last photo)
Next