Hate Rear Wings? Porsche Now Has a 911 GT3 Just For You - the 911 GT3 Touring Package

Timothy Cain
by Timothy Cain

Plymouth Superbird. Lamborghini Countach. BMW 3.0 CSL. A80 Toyota Supra. Ford Escort Cosworth. Acura Integra Type R. Subaru Impreza WRX STI.

Some cars are indellibly linked with the rear wing that sat atop their trunklids. In some cases, the spoilers weren’t mandatory, but in your mind’s eye, you always envision the WRX STI and Countach with large aerodynamic addenda.

Certainly not every edition of the Porsche 911 is fitted with a rear wing. But from ducktails to speed-sensitive units to gigantic struts supporting flat planes, the Porsche 911’s shape has been connected to additional rear bodywork for decades. The faster the 911, the more likely you were to find an extra piece affixed to the “911” above its engine.

But times, they are a-changin’. And in an attempt to mute the 2018 Porsche 911 GT3 for a mature, purist clientele, a new Touring Package deletes the GT3’s fixed rear wing and forces the fitment of a six-speed manual transmission.

Touring Package cost?

After all, this is Porsche, where the 911 GT3’s front axle lift system costs $2,590; where encasing the dashtop, steering column, sun visors, and transmission tunnel in leather adds $2,680; where the dynamic light system that’s standard on a $37,150 Volkswagen Tiguan adds $780. Adding 27 horsepower to the Porsche 911 Turbo S costs $67,000. Optional wheels on the 911 Turbo S Exclusive Series cost $14,980.

So the 2018 Porsche 911 GT3’s Touring Package? It’s as free as books at the library.

In place of the usual 911 GT3 fixed rear wing, Porsche installs an automatically extending rear spoiler called a Gurney Flap. Badging on the rear lid says GT3 Touring. Rather than Alcantara, the steering wheel, shift lever, doorhandle, and armrests are leather-clad. Stitching switches from grey to black. The manual transmission and 4.0-liter boxer six-cylinder are linked to Porsche Torque Vectoring.

The 2018 Porsche 911 GT3 Touring, Porsche says, won’t be available until November 2017 “at the earliest.” Pricing, including destination, starts at $144,650. The 4.0-liter engine produces 500 horsepower and 339 lb-ft of torque, revving to 8,250 sonorous rpm. Although Porsche says the PDK-equipped GT3 accelerates from nought to 60 four-tenths of a second quicker than the manual car, the seven-speed PDK would add 37 pounds to the GT3. If, that is, it was available with the Touring Package, which it’s not.

U.S. sales of the entire Porsche 911 range are down 9 percent this year, on track for a six-year low. But 911 sales in August 2017, an inordinately car-centric month for Porsche, did rise to a 16-month high.

[Images: Porsche]

Timothy Cain is a contributing analyst at The Truth About Cars and Autofocus.ca and the founder and former editor of GoodCarBadCar.net. Follow on Twitter @timcaincars and Instagram.

Timothy Cain
Timothy Cain

More by Timothy Cain

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 23 comments
  • White Shadow White Shadow on Sep 12, 2017

    Finally!! I don't hate rear wings, but I do hate them when they are overly large and obnoxious. I didn't think we'd ever see the day that you could get a GT3 without the stupidly big wing on the back.

  • Voyager Voyager on Sep 13, 2017

    "Touring package"... Perhaps someone should tell those Germans that a car that practically invites you to behave like a hooligan doing the twisties is something different than dad leisurely coasting down the highway.

    • See 1 previous
    • Mermilio Mermilio on Sep 13, 2017

      If I'm spending $144 THOUSAND for a car, I'll hoon however I damn well please.

  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Off-road fluff on vehicles that should not be off road needs to die.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Saw this posted on social media; “Just bought a 2023 Tundra with the 14" screen. Let my son borrow it for the afternoon, he connected his phone to listen to his iTunes.The next day my insurance company raised my rates and added my son to my policy. The email said that a private company showed that my son drove the vehicle. He already had his own vehicle that he was insuring.My insurance company demanded he give all his insurance info and some private info for proof. He declined for privacy reasons and my insurance cancelled my policy.These new vehicles with their tech are on condition that we give up our privacy to enter their world. It's not worth it people.”
Next