Engine Smorgasbord for the 2018 Jeep Wrangler, Or…?

by Steph Willems

Published: May 17th, 2017

engine smorgasbord for the 2018 jeep wrangler or

Should you expect Ford Fusion levels of engine choice in the next-generation Jeep Wrangler? A new report claims yes, you should.

A source who claims connections at a Fiat Chrysler Automobiles plant has told Jalopnik the upcoming 2018 model will host six engines, but a rational take on the matter would suggest readers not get their hopes up — at least, not in the U.S.

The source’s engine list sounds like the entirety of a vehicle’s global engine range, and it very well could be. In it, the source lists two 3.6-liter Pentastar engines, a 3.0-liter and 2.2-liter diesel, and two versions of a 2.0-liter engine.

So far, the only American engine options we’ve heard of are the stalwart 3.6 liter, a diesel option (likely the existing 3.0-liter unit found in the Grand Cherokee), and a turbocharged 2.0-liter “Hurricane” four with output in the 300-horsepower range.

It’s entirely possible a naturally aspirated or not-quite-as-hot turbo four could appear in overseas markets. Jeep debuted its 2.2-liter MultiJet II engine in mid-2015, with the diesel motor finding a home in the European-market Cherokee. That’s another off-the-shelf option for the folks at FCA.

The twin Pentastar mention intrigues, as it could signal an extra offering for U.S. buyers. FCA reportedly plans to add direct injection to its 3.6-liter V6, with the possibility of a turbocharged option for such vehicles as the 2019 Ram 1500. If this source has his planning details correct, it could mean a much hotter Wrangler variant will become available. Of course, it could also mean FCA plans to soldier on with the old Pentastar in some overseas markets. (Do Russia and Brazil really need direct injection?)

Like other automakers, FCA isn’t in the habit of commenting on future models, and that seems to be the case here. Earlier this year, Jeep boss Mike Manley claimed a hybrid variant is still in the works, though the automaker hasn’t nailed down an exact configuration or timeline for its electrified Wrangler. A pickup version should begin production in late 2019.

The mildly streamlined and lightweighted 2018 Wrangler is expected to start production this November.

#2018JeepWrangler #Engines #Jeep #JeepWrangler #Overseas #ProductPlanning

Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments

Join the conversation

5 of 26 comments

Deanst on May 17, 2017

I don't think many non-luxury cars are being planned with V8s.

Like Reply
KOKing on May 17, 2017

Screw the 5.7 HEMI. Go directly to Hellcat. As for a 4-pot, I suspect the CJ3 purists would insist that a proper Jeep has a 4cyl.

Like Reply
- See 2 previous
- Hummer on May 17, 2017
  
  Using the hellcat engine would make it a "special" product. The V8 should be an affordable family friendly option.
  
  Like
- Lou_BC on May 18, 2017
  
  @Hummer The HellCat in a Jeep Wrangler would be a warranty and liability nightmare.
  
  Like
- 87 Morgan on May 18, 2017
  
  @Lou_BC Yeah, but how much fun would it be to set up a lawn chair with a cooler on a Saturday and watch as the HC Wranglers leave the lot after purchase. New owner would invariably use the key that unlocks the full 707 and roll the thing in first 400 feet.
  
  Like

Recent Comments

W Conrad I'm not afraid of them, but they aren't needed for everyone or everywhere. Long haul and highway driving sure, but in the city, nope.
Jalop1991 In a manner similar to PHEV being the correct answer, I declare RPVs to be the correct answer here.We're doing it with certain aircraft; why not with cars on the ground, using hardware and tools like Telsa's "FSD" or GM's "SuperCruise" as the base?Take the local Uber driver out of the car, and put him in a professional centralized environment from where he drives me around. The system and the individual car can have awareness as well as gates, but he's responsible for the driving.Put the tech into my car, and let me buy it as needed. I need someone else to drive me home; hit the button and voila, I've hired a driver for the moment. I don't want to drive 11 hours to my vacation spot; hire the remote pilot for that. When I get there, I have my car and he's still at his normal location, piloting cars for other people.The system would allow for driver rest period, like what's required for truckers, so I might end up with multiple people driving me to the coast. I don't care. And they don't have to be physically with me, therefore they can be way cheaper.Charge taxi-type per-mile rates. For long drives, offer per-trip rates. Offer subscriptions, including miles/hours. Whatever.(And for grins, dress the remote pilots all as Johnnie.)Start this out with big rigs. Take the trucker away from the long haul driving, and let him be there for emergencies and the short haul parts of the trip.And in a manner similar to PHEVs being discredited, I fully expect to be razzed for this brilliant idea (not unlike how Alan Kay wasn't recognized until many many years later for his Dynabook vision).
B-BodyBuick84 Not afraid of AV's as I highly doubt they will ever be %100 viable for our roads. Stop-and-go downtown city or rush hour highway traffic? I can see that, but otherwise there's simply too many variables. Bad weather conditions, faded road lines or markings, reflective surfaces with glare, etc. There's also the issue of cultural norms. About a decade ago there was actually an online test called 'The Morality Machine' one could do online where you were in control of an AV and choose what action to take when a crash was inevitable. I think something like 2.5 million people across the world participated? For example, do you hit and most likely kill the elderly couple strolling across the crosswalk or crash the vehicle into a cement barrier and almost certainly cause the death of the vehicle occupants? What if it's a parent and child? In N. America 98% of people choose to hit the elderly couple and save themselves while in Asia, the exact opposite happened where 98% choose to hit the parent and child. Why? Cultural differences. Asia puts a lot of emphasis on respecting their elderly while N. America has a culture of 'save/ protect the children'. Are these AV's going to respect that culture? Is a VW Jetta or Buick Envision AV going to have different programming depending on whether it's sold in Canada or Taiwan? how's that going to effect legislation and legal battles when a crash inevitibly does happen? These are the true barriers to mass AV adoption, and in the 10 years since that test came out, there has been zero answers or progress on this matter. So no, I'm not afraid of AV's simply because with the exception of a few specific situations, most avenues are going to prove to be a dead-end for automakers.
Mike Bradley Autonomous cars were developed in Silicon Valley. For new products there, the standard business plan is to put a barely-functioning product on the market right away and wait for the early-adopter customers to find the flaws. That's exactly what's happened. Detroit's plan is pretty much the opposite, but Detroit isn't developing this product. That's why dealers, for instance, haven't been trained in the cars.
Dartman https://apnews.com/article/artificial-intelligence-fighter-jets-air-force-6a1100c96a73ca9b7f41cbd6a2753fdaAutonomous/Ai is here now. The question is implementation and acceptance.