Junkyard Find: 1990 Range Rover Classic

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

Denver drivers love their luxury SUVs, and European luxury vehicles tend to depreciate in a hurry. This means plenty of Land Rovers show up in the area’s big self-service wrecking yards. While this is good news for the several Coloradans who might be interested in finding a Rover V8 to drop into a homegrown MGB-GT V8, I don’t pay much attention to these trucks. IHC Scouts, sure, and maybe the occasional Jeep Cherokee get into this series, but I have walked right by hundreds of discarded British status-boxes and not paid much attention.

A Range Rover with 266,666 miles on the clock, though, is another story.

Only 400,000 more miles to reach the onramp of the Highway To Hell!

In 1990, having a hardwired analog “car phone” with external antenna was still a big deal, so much so that you could buy phony stick-on antennae. Adding one to roll-up door glass seems like a poor decision, but maybe this one exists solely for attaching Broncos-colors ribbons.

I’m willing to bet that the original purchaser of this $38,575 truck (close to 72 grand in inflation-adjusted 2017 dollars) would sooner have snorted up a line of fire ants than slap a sticker on the front door.

The contrast between gauzy brochure photograph and gritty junkyard reality couldn’t be much greater than this. A young 24 Hours of LeMons founder Jay Lamm went on the Great Divide Expedition press event for the 1990 Range Rover, back when he was a young automotive journalist, and wound up obliterating one in a rollover crash while trying to catch Malcolm Smith on a Rocky Mountain dirt path, but this interesting fact gets no mention in the Great Divide Edition brochure.

Members of this engine family were made for nearly 50 years. Lots of weird plot twists in the Buick 215/Rover V8 story.

“It has established for itself an enviable position in the automotive world.”






Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 33 comments
  • E30driver E30driver on Mar 06, 2017

    I owned a '95 from 2013 to 2015 and commuted 45 minutes each way into downtown DC every single day. Last year for the Classic. Never left me stranded, and always started on the first turn of the key! I carefully tracked my mpg, and averaged about 9.5 in my usual commute, but managed to eek out 13 or so on pure highway trips. The HVAC was amazing. But I had my share of electrical gremlins, with frequent trouble with switches working one day but not the next. I would own another in a heartbeat... There is just a very special feeling you get from behind the wheel.

  • Theoldguard Theoldguard on Mar 08, 2017

    My 1990 Range Rover is tied with 1982 Chevy Citation X11 as the worst cars I have ever owned.

    • Ol Shel Ol Shel on Mar 08, 2017

      We had an x-11. Super reliable other than a front wheel bearing or two.

  • Redapple2 jeffbut they dont want to ... their pick up is 4th behind ford/ram, Toyota. GM has the Best engineers in the world. More truck profit than the other 3. Silverado + Sierra+ Tahoe + Yukon sales = 2x ford total @ $15,000 profit per. Tons o $ to invest in the BEST truck. No. They make crap. Garbage. Evil gm Vampire
  • Rishabh Ive actually seen the one unit you mentioned, driving around in gurugram once. And thats why i got curious to know more about how many they sold. Seems like i saw the only one!
  • Amy I owned this exact car from 16 until 19 (1990 to 1993) I miss this car immensely and am on the search to own it again, although it looks like my search may be in vane. It was affectionatly dubbed, " The Dragon Wagon," and hauled many a teenager around the city of Charlotte, NC. For me, it was dependable and trustworthy. I was able to do much of the maintenance myself until I was struck by lightning and a month later the battery exploded. My parents did have the entire electrical system redone and he was back to new. I hope to find one in the near future and make it my every day driver. I'm a dreamer.
  • Jeff Overall I prefer the 59 GM cars to the 58s because of less chrome but I have a new appreciation of the 58 Cadillac Eldorados after reading this series. I use to not like the 58 Eldorados but I now don't mind them. Overall I prefer the 55-57s GMs over most of the 58-60s GMs. For the most part I like the 61 GMs. Chryslers I like the 57 and 58s. Fords I liked the 55 thru 57s but the 58s and 59s not as much with the exception of Mercury which I for the most part like all those. As the 60s progressed the tail fins started to go away and the amount of chrome was reduced. More understated.
  • Theflyersfan Nissan could have the best auto lineup of any carmaker (they don't), but until they improve one major issue, the best cars out there won't matter. That is the dealership experience. Year after year in multiple customer service surveys from groups like JD Power and CR, Nissan frequency scrapes the bottom. Personally, I really like the never seen new Z, but after having several truly awful Nissan dealer experiences, my shadow will never darken a Nissan showroom. I'm painting with broad strokes here, but maybe it is so ingrained in their culture to try to take advantage of people who might not be savvy enough in the buying experience that they by default treat everyone like idiots and saps. All of this has to be frustrating to Nissan HQ as they are improving their lineup but their dealers drag them down.
Next