Oshawa Will Perform Silverado and Sierra Final Assembly

Mark Stevenson
by Mark Stevenson

Trucks are coming back to Oshawa — kinda.

According to The Globe and Mail, a $400-million investment will fund upgrades necessary for Oshawa to perform final assembly of General Motors pickups using bodies manufactured in Fort Wayne, Indiana, and shipped to Canada.

The report states the investment in Oshawa’s Flex Line will enable it to build the trucks, which includes installing interiors and other tasks much like work performed by Consolidated Line workers to build Chevrolet Equinoxes using bodies provided by CAMI Automotive in Ingersoll, Ontario.

GM’s Fort Wayne Assembly currently produces regular- and double-cab light- and heavy-duty pickups.

After marathon negotiations earlier this week, Unifor president Jerry Dias praised the deal reached with General Motors, stating, “I am pleased to announce to our members … that we have found a solution for your facilities.” It’s unclear if the solution is needed for sake of pickup demand or a “make-work” project to keep Oshawa open until the next round of labor negotiations, which are planned for 2020.

The Globe and Mail stated sources had earlier said full-size SUV bodies could be shipped from Arlington, Texas, for final assembly, which would have meant a 1,460-mile journey to Oshawa. The bodies coming from Fort Wayne will be shipped just over 400 miles for final assembly.

The new production allotment is a far cry from what Oshawa lost in 2009. In the throes of the recession, General Motors closed its truck plant in Oshawa. GM eventually moved that production to Silao, Mexico, when sales of full-size pickups increased as the economy recovered.

Oshawa has lost other products recently, including the Chevrolet Camaro (production moved to Michigan) and Chevrolet Impala Limited, a previous-generation Impala that went out of production this summer.

In addition to the new pickup line, Oshawa will produce the Cadillac XTS until 2019. General Motors plans to produce the next-generation Buick Regal exclusively in Germany. The current-generation Chevrolet Impala is currently built in Oshawa and Michigan, but demand for full-size sedans is on a downward trend.

[Image: General Motors]

Mark Stevenson
Mark Stevenson

More by Mark Stevenson

Comments
Join the conversation
9 of 35 comments
  • Big Al from Oz Big Al from Oz on Sep 22, 2016

    Wow, this kind of stuff can't be efficient. Someone must be paying (the Canadian taxpayer?) I remember back in the 70s here in Australia when our dairy industry is much as the US is now, regulated and controlled. This is what occurred. Milk was transported over 1 000km from Victoria to New South Wales and New South Wales milk was transported to Victoria to keep jobs flowing. Since the early eighties when Australia freed up its economy and became a free market economy milk has dropped in price, along with cheese and butter. We can buy a nice one kilo cheddar for $6AUD or $4.50USD. Milk is 90c AUD per litre or 65cUS a quart. Australia is now a mass exporter of dairy. Why? Because the farmers had to become competitive. The sh!t farmers sold out or went broke, which was good. This article highlights what happens with protection of unviable industry. The NA auto industry really needs to free up its practices or it will go down big time and the Chinese will end up owning the Big 3.

    • See 3 previous
    • Lou_BC Lou_BC on Sep 22, 2016

      Big Al from Oz - we all can change our names and it isn't going to change a thing. "If one runs across more than 3 a-holes in one day, one needs to look in the mirror to see the a-hole actually is."

  • Jhughes Jhughes on Sep 22, 2016

    Logistically, I don't see how it could make money or sense to build a vehicle partway in one factory, then ship it 400 miles so another factory can finish assembly. I get that it's about the bigger picture, some of which involves keeping people employed at Oshawa. But why not just build the entire vehicle, whatever it is, in one factory? It's not like they have to go the crate knock-down route to avoid the Chicken Tax.

    • See 2 previous
    • Sgeffe Sgeffe on Sep 29, 2016

      Late to the party, but in the case of those trucks, will the VIN show Canada? (Point of final assembly?) That'd be my guess, but I could be wrong.

  • Jimbo1126 Supposedly Messi has reserved a unit but he already got a big house in Fort Lauderdale... I guess that's why :)
  • El scotto Dale Carnegie had his grandkids do some upgrades?
  • El scotto Work it backwards. How many people use Tesla Super Chargers: Primary Charging Point - this is my normal charging station; Secondary charging station - at a retail location or planned on trips, Rarely or Not at All.
  • FreedMike Some clarification would make sense here: Tesla is laying off the team responsible for BUILDING NEW Supercharger stations. Apparently the ones already being built are going to be completed. The folks who maintain the current network are apparently unaffected. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/30/business/tesla-layoffs-supercharger-team.htmlAlso, many other other manufacturers are switching to NACS in the upcoming years, and some of those companies are already providing Supercharger adaptors for their non-NACS vehicles. Some Superchargers can already accomodate non-Tesla vehicles with a built in adaptor called the "magic dock."Given all this, my guess? They're trying to maximize utilization of the current system before building it out further.
  • Dartman Damn Healey! You can only milk a cow so many times a day! Don’t worry though I bet Flex, 28, 1991, and all the usual suspects are just getting their fingers warmed up!
Next