What Would a Mazda3-based Dodge Dart Successor Look Like?
Last week, our own Tim Cain broke down exactly why the Dart was destined for the dustbin. Steph asked in April if the Dart would outlast the Obama administration, a question answered last week with a resounding “no” from Auburn Hills. And before that, I asked you what company could build a replacement for the Dart, while offering up my own guesses. One car kept rising to the top of the suggestion list: the Mazda3.
But, what would a Mazda3-based Dodge Dart replacement look like? We wanted to know. And since none of us at TTAC are particularly gifted when it comes to pixel manipulation, we commissioned a pair of renders from the talented Theophilus Chin of Chris Doane Automotive to find out.
Why the Mazda3?
Unlike Mitsubishi, which could build a vehicle in partnership with FCA but would do so outside the NAFTA region, the Mexican-build, NAFTA-friendly Mazda3 is an engineered product already plodding American roads. For its part, FCA would only need to pay to design some lighting and body panels. That’s a helluva lot easier than engaging an old partner that’s now tied up with the Renault-Nissan Alliance.
Visual Comparison
Our artist dispatched the Mazda3’s happy face in favor of Dodge’s trademark crosshair grille. The large, lower faux airdam is separated from the upper, functional grille in our render, which is bookended by headlights inspired by the Dodge Charger.
Surprising, our artist’s changes at the rear are not a distant visual departure from the original Dart. The racetrack taillights are sharper toward the ends, but a short rear deck and Hoffmeister kink in the rear window tie in our Mazda3-based render with its Dart predecessor. It does look like a Mazda3-based replacement could lose a fair amount of rear overhang and trunk space, however.
What do you think? Let us know in the comments.
[Image: © 2016 Theophilus Chin/Chris Doane Automotive for The Truth About Cars]
More by Mark Stevenson
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- Daniel J I had read an article several years ago that one of the issues that workers were complaining about with this plant is that 1/3 of the workforce were temporary workers. They didn't have the same benefits as the other 2/3 of the employees. Will this improve this situation or make it worse? Do temporary workers get a vote?I honestly don't care as long as it is not a requirement to work at the plant.
- Kosmo Tragic. Where in the name of all that is holy did anybody get the idea that self-driving cars were a good idea? I get the desire for lane-keeping, and use it myself, occasionally, but I don't even like to look across the car at my passenger while driving, let along relinquish complete control.
- Bof65705611 There’s one of these around the corner from me. It still runs…driven daily, in fact. That fact always surprises me.
- Master Baiter I'm skeptical of any project with government strings attached. I've read that the new CHIPS act which is supposed to bring semiconductor manufacturing back to the U.S. is so loaded with DEI requirements that companies would rather not even bother trying to set up shop here. Cheaper to keep buying from TSMC.
- CanadaCraig VOTE NO VW!
Comments
Join the conversation
What they should do is base the Dodge Dart on the same platform that Alfa Romeo is using for the new Giulia sedan and have it powered by a turbo version of the Pentastar V-6 engine.
Would it be at all possible to apply some rouge and a bit of lipstick to a Corolla and sell that? As long as it's decently thinly veiled Dodge might sell them by the quiverful to the Toyota-automatically-better crowd. Think of all the children. I personally don't see much difference between this and the actual car. Not that tits a bad thing as I like its looks, but it is visually very bulky.