Columbus Wins Federal 'Smart City' Grant, Meaning More EVs in a State Without Much Green Power

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Columbus, Ohio was chosen as the winner of the U.S. Department of Transportation’s “Smart City Challenge,” beating out six other mid-size cities for the $40 million federal grant.

With that grant and $100 million pledged from philanthropic and business sources on tap, the city’s plan will see improvements in social infrastructure and green, connected transportation — including greater electric vehicle use and new recharging infrastructure — despite the fact that Ohio’s power grid isn’t very green.

The goal of the DOT’s Smart City Challenge is to create the sustainable transportation network of the future. Columbus beat out Portland, Pittsburgh, Kansas City, Austin, San Francisco and Denver to win the federal cash. The bulk of the remaining money ($90 million) will come from local businesses, with $10 million sourced from Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen’s Vulcan Inc.

What does it mean for the Ohio capital? Mainly, improved transit options and WiFi infrastructure in the city’s most impoverished neighborhood, better access to health care, an app for mobility options, electric shuttle buses connecting transit stations to job-heavy retail locations, and a big push to increase EV use.

Columbus plans to convert more of its public vehicle fleet to EVs, and its businesses have pledged to increase EV use in their own fleets, as well as build new recharging stations. Under the plan, company CEOs will even ditch their gas-powered rides for EVs.

The goal of reducing infant mortality rates and improving the lives of low-income residents is admirable, but the city’s EV plan has an environmental Achilles heel. According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, Ohio’s electricity network ranks 49th out of 50 states for renewable power (2015 figures), with the grid’s biggest energy source (58 percent of generation, as of 2015) being coal.

Last June, Ohio’s public utilities commission listed “renewables” as just 1.5 percent of the state’s energy mix, with coal making up roughly 58 percent, natural gas at 24.8 percent, and nuclear at 15.47 percent.

State law says that 12.5 percent of Ohio’s electricity generation must come from renewables by 2027, which will surely make the Columbus EV fleet a little greener. Still, unless they offset their increased electricity use in other ways, EV owners in Ohio are just trading their personal tailpipe emissions for a faraway boost in smokestack emissions.

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 122 comments
  • The Dad The Dad on Jul 11, 2016

    So my training on the subject is a little long in the tooth, but iirc, it's far cheaper and more efficient to scrub pollutants from stationary sources like power plants than from mobile sources like ICE cars. It's at least theoretically possible that it's a net positive.

  • TMA1 TMA1 on Jul 11, 2016

    And to think, all those years Mayor Coleman spent trying to get light rail into the city. I bet he would have loved to get his hands on some of this money. Finally, instead of having the #2 occasionally slow down traffic on High St., they could rip out an entire lane that would make the OSU campus more accessible to criminals via light rail.

  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh A prelude is a bad idea. There is already Acura with all the weird sport trims. This will not make back it's R&D money.
  • Analoggrotto I don't see a red car here, how blazing stupid are you people?
  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
Next