Mercedes-Benz AMG GT: Unimaginatively Named Product, Wildly Wacky Paint Scheme

Derek Kreindler
by Derek Kreindler

Mercedes is doing the slow burn on the AMG GT, successor to the gullwinged SLS, ahead of its debut at the Paris Auto Show in September. Even though this is just a camo wrap job, it’s not too hard to imagine this look appearing on a future customer car.

Thanks to increasingly stringent regulations, the glorious AMG V8 displacing 6.2L will die, and in its place, a 4.0L twin-turbo V8 will power future AMG models. Without the gullwing doors, some of the visual drama is lost – but perhaps we’ll get that wrap as a factory option instead. After all, something has to draw excessive attention to you and your car, now that you can’t just pop the gullwing doors open at leisure.



Derek Kreindler
Derek Kreindler

More by Derek Kreindler

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 7 comments
  • ClutchCarGo ClutchCarGo on Jul 10, 2014

    Driving outside of Denver this past weekend, I caught a brief glimpse of something like this in black and white camo, followed by a motel stay where a group of MB engineers were caravaning around with a couple of Sprinters and what looked like a couple of minivans in camo as well.

    • See 2 previous
    • Ellomdian Ellomdian on Jul 11, 2014

      @th009 Old-school extreme Hot/Cold testing has got to be one of the most miserable jobs in the industry - once a day, go out and start the car, and then shut it off and go back inside. Blech...

  • LeMansteve LeMansteve on Jul 11, 2014

    Unimaginatively Named Product At least it isn't shamelessly adopting the GT name like so many crappy Pontiacs did. Besides, imaginative marketing managers give us horrible names like Z4 sDrive35is or Mazda Mazda3 (not a typo).

  • Brandon I would vote for my 23 Escape ST-Line with the 2.0L turbo and a normal 8 speed transmission instead of CVT. 250 HP, I average 28 MPG and get much higher on trips and get a nice 13" sync4 touchscreen. It leaves these 2 in my dust literally
  • JLGOLDEN When this and Hornet were revealed, I expected BOTH to quickly become best-sellers for their brands. They look great, and seem like interesting and fun alternatives in a crowded market. Alas, ambitious pricing is a bridge too far...
  • Zerofoo Modifications are funny things. I like the smoked side marker look - however having seen too many cars with butchered wire harnesses, I don't buy cars with ANY modifications. Pro-tip - put the car back to stock before you try and sell it.
  • JLGOLDEN I disagree with the author's comment on the current Murano's "annoying CVT". Murano's CVT does not fake shifts like some CVTs attempt, therefore does not cause shift shock or driveline harshness while fumbling between set ratios. Murano's CVT feels genuinely smooth and lets the (great-sounding V6) engine sing and zing along pleasantly.
  • JLGOLDEN Our family bought a 2012 Murano AWD new, and enjoyed it for 280K before we sold it last month. CVT began slipping at 230K but it was worth fixing a clean, well-cared for car. As soon as we sold the 2012, I grabbed a new 2024 Murano before the body style and powertrain changes for 2025, and (as rumored) goes to 4-cyl turbo. Sure, the current Murano feels old-school, with interior switchgear and finishes akin to a 2010 Infiniti. That's not a bad thing! Feels solid, V6 sounds awesome, and the whole platform has been around long enough that future parts & service wont be an issue.
Next