GM Q2 Profits: $1.2 Billion, Down Due To New Pickup Launch Costs

TTAC Staff
by TTAC Staff

General Motors said that costs associated with the launch of their redesigned pickup trucks and weaker results in Asia (except for China) lowered net income for the second fiscal quarter of 2013 by 19% from last year, to $1.2 billion.

Overall revenue was up 4% to just over 39 billion dollars. Income before taxes, interest and non-recurring items like GM’s purchase of $200 million worth of preferred shares in GM’s Korean subsidiary, was up 7% to $2.3 billion. Even with the rollout costs for the new Chevy Silverado and GMC Sierra, pretax profits in North America were up 4.5% to $2.0 billion. As with Ford, GM’s loses in Europe shrunk, though by a much larger figure, dropping to $110 million from $394 million in Q2 2012. Since coming out of bankruptcy in 2009, GM has made over $19 billion in 14 straight quarterly profits.

Though dealers were selling off remaining stock of the old 2013 pickup truck models, which usually means more cash incentives to move them out to make place for the revised trucks, strong U.S. demand for pickup trucks offset the downward price pressure. Transaction prices for GM’s full-size pickup trucks were up 5% to $36,641. Analysts says that GM makes an average of about $10,000 for every pickup truck they sell. Silverado and Sierra U.S. sales combined rose 23 percent through June, to 330,219. GM expects the second half of 2013 to be even better than the first, with the all new C7 Corvette Sting Ray and the new, larger Cadillac CTS arriving at dealers.

For GM International Operations, which includes Asia, Australia, and Russia, overall pretax profit was down 64%, to $228 million, though pretax profit in China was up. The weak Japanese yen is creating price pressure in many of those markets.

GM South America made a pretax profit of $54 million, up from only $16 million in this quarter last year.

GM Financial’s profits were up 17% to $254 million.

During the quarter, the price for GM shares went up 20%, surpassing the $33 IPO price for the first time in over two years. The share price got a boost from news that the U.S. Treasury was selling off more of its equity in the automaker, the result of the 2009 bailout, and from GM’s relisting on the Standard & Poor 500 in June. At Wednesday’s close, GM common stock was $37.14.

TTAC Staff
TTAC Staff

More by TTAC Staff

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 52 comments
  • JaySeis JaySeis on Jul 26, 2013

    Hilarious headline. Could've just as well said: GM profits down 'cause that's the price of doing business. OR: GM profits down because they paid their workers. Or the best of all; GM profits up because their no longer launching new pickups.

  • Baba Baba on Jul 26, 2013

    Says a lot about the Impala that high priced Lexus cannot overtake the Chevy this year. I have sat in and driven the new Impala. It is outstanding in all areas.

  • Redapple2 jeffbut they dont want to ... their pick up is 4th behind ford/ram, Toyota. GM has the Best engineers in the world. More truck profit than the other 3. Silverado + Sierra+ Tahoe + Yukon sales = 2x ford total @ $15,000 profit per. Tons o $ to invest in the BEST truck. No. They make crap. Garbage. Evil gm Vampire
  • Rishabh Ive actually seen the one unit you mentioned, driving around in gurugram once. And thats why i got curious to know more about how many they sold. Seems like i saw the only one!
  • Amy I owned this exact car from 16 until 19 (1990 to 1993) I miss this car immensely and am on the search to own it again, although it looks like my search may be in vane. It was affectionatly dubbed, " The Dragon Wagon," and hauled many a teenager around the city of Charlotte, NC. For me, it was dependable and trustworthy. I was able to do much of the maintenance myself until I was struck by lightning and a month later the battery exploded. My parents did have the entire electrical system redone and he was back to new. I hope to find one in the near future and make it my every day driver. I'm a dreamer.
  • Jeff Overall I prefer the 59 GM cars to the 58s because of less chrome but I have a new appreciation of the 58 Cadillac Eldorados after reading this series. I use to not like the 58 Eldorados but I now don't mind them. Overall I prefer the 55-57s GMs over most of the 58-60s GMs. For the most part I like the 61 GMs. Chryslers I like the 57 and 58s. Fords I liked the 55 thru 57s but the 58s and 59s not as much with the exception of Mercury which I for the most part like all those. As the 60s progressed the tail fins started to go away and the amount of chrome was reduced. More understated.
  • Theflyersfan Nissan could have the best auto lineup of any carmaker (they don't), but until they improve one major issue, the best cars out there won't matter. That is the dealership experience. Year after year in multiple customer service surveys from groups like JD Power and CR, Nissan frequency scrapes the bottom. Personally, I really like the never seen new Z, but after having several truly awful Nissan dealer experiences, my shadow will never darken a Nissan showroom. I'm painting with broad strokes here, but maybe it is so ingrained in their culture to try to take advantage of people who might not be savvy enough in the buying experience that they by default treat everyone like idiots and saps. All of this has to be frustrating to Nissan HQ as they are improving their lineup but their dealers drag them down.
Next