CAW And Chrysler Reach Deal: Marchionne May Get The Last Laugh

Derek Kreindler
by Derek Kreindler

Did Ken Lewenza hose Sergio Marchionne and Chrysler? Ask me that a few days ago and I may have said yes. Now that the terms of the CAW and Chrysler have surfaced, I’m not so sure.

A superficial glance at the situation seems to have the scoreboard favoring the CAW. Chrysler agreed to the pattern agreement that includes the $9,000 per worker lump sum payments that Chrysler was dead set against, as well as the return of the COLA payments in Q4 2016. Kenny 1, Sergio 0, right? Not so fast.

Ford and GM all have product and investment guarantees written into their labor agreements. Chrysler’s is noticeably void of them. One of the expected conditions of the agreement was that a third shift would be added at the Brampton Assembly plant that builds the rear-drive Chrysler LX cars. According to the Windsor Star, that didn’t happen

“In Brampton, the CAW could only secure a promise to maintain the two shifts at the plant that manufactures the Chrysler 300, Dodge Challenger and Charger during the life of the agreement. “That plant is incredibly important,” said Lewenza.”

Chrysler will keep the three-shift Windsor plant up and running for the life of the agreement. The minivans are selling like hotcakes in Canada, and dominating in the US minivan market, and Chrysler needs every bit of capacity they can get. Previous reports estimated that further investment in the Brampton plant could add as many as 1,000 jobs and be worth as much as $400 million, but there’s a possibility that rear-drive car production could leave Canada, not for the United States, but Italy.

Here’s the scenario; the next Chrysler 300 and Dodge Charger will use a rear-drive platform that will be utilized across the Chrysler-Fiat empire. Depending on the day, it can be an Alfa Romeo, or a Maserati or an SRT Baracuda. The specific models aren’t as important as the fact that it’s a global platform. And that means products based off of it can and will be built and sold around the globe. Over at Fiat, plants are running at 50 percent capacity and Italy’s economy is in the toilet. Jobs would be brought home, plants could be running at or above the magic 75 percent number and Chrysler sheds the financial burden of assembling cars in Canada.

Meanwhile, the CAW sold 1,000 badly needed manufacturing jobs (the kind they complain are disappearing in Canada) for $9,000 per worker in lump sum payments. Right now, it looks like incredibly short sighted thinking. It may be a “damn good deal” for the current workers at Chrysler, but the lack of any job/investment guarantees likely came as a quid pro quo for Chrysler maintaing the lump sum payouts. What if the CAW agreed to rescind them, in exchange for promises to expand the future of Canada’s manufacturing base?

The odds of that deal getting ratified by workers is about as likely as Sergio not saying “vaffanculo” to Canada and the CAW come 2016.

Derek Kreindler
Derek Kreindler

More by Derek Kreindler

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 44 comments
  • Dimwit Dimwit on Sep 28, 2012

    This is a joke. Everyone seems to think that Mexico is some sort of paradise for assembly plants. I take it that you guys don't read the news. Mexico is corrupt and violent. Not a particularily great place to do business. Yeah, not all of Mexico is that bad, just near the US border. Urrr, right. Brampton will be fine for a while. The biggest thing will be new product and that's a concern. Sergio is playing games with the complete Empire by shuffling and witholding models throughout FIAT and only making minor changes to the Chryco models. The Dart is the only new thing they've introduced and it better be a huge success. We'll see how 2015 goes.

  • Glenn Mercer Glenn Mercer on Sep 28, 2012

    I think you are right. I'll just have to calm down, take my meds, and await the return of Alfa to the USA with some other model. I do remain convinced Alfa will be here soon, right about the same time as the paperless office arrives, and trans-Atlantic kerosene-powered dirigible service... (sigh)

  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Off-road fluff on vehicles that should not be off road needs to die.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Saw this posted on social media; “Just bought a 2023 Tundra with the 14" screen. Let my son borrow it for the afternoon, he connected his phone to listen to his iTunes.The next day my insurance company raised my rates and added my son to my policy. The email said that a private company showed that my son drove the vehicle. He already had his own vehicle that he was insuring.My insurance company demanded he give all his insurance info and some private info for proof. He declined for privacy reasons and my insurance cancelled my policy.These new vehicles with their tech are on condition that we give up our privacy to enter their world. It's not worth it people.”
Next