By on August 16, 2012

GM’s Opel unit is faced with dwindling demand and wants to shorten workers’ hours at its Rüsselsheim plant, media from Reuters to Germany’s Manager Magazin report. Rüsselsheim makes the Opel Insignia, and for that, the rapidly deteriorating southern European markets are especially important, an Opel spokesman said. A shortened work week at Opel’s engine plant in Kaiserslautern is also being negotiated, the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung says. However, this is Germany, and it is not as easy as is sounds.

Shortened hours (they can be shortened all the way to zero,) called “Kurzarbeit” (“short work”) in German, are a temporary measure that allows to react to insufficient demand. Workers can be sent home without or with reduced pay, they will receive unemployment benefits of up to 67 percent of their normal pay, a government-funded jobs bank, if you will. So far, so good.

However, the measure needs to be approved, both by the paying government and the company’s works council. The negotiations will be difficult. Usually, the works council agrees to shortened hours, because the other alternative would be firings. Opel does not have that other alternative. There is a contract that forbids firings through 2014.

Works council, unions and government will ask uncomfortable questions. Opel’s Bochum plant currently works around the clock in three shifts, its works council chief Rainer Einenkel told the FAZ today. Oddly enough, that plant is under threat of closure once the contract allows it. The Rüsselsheim plant already worked only on 4 days of the week before shortened work was contemplated.  I am sure commenters will have pat answers for that, the questions will come nevertheless.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

7 Comments on “GM’s Opel: Workers, Go Home...”


  • avatar
    philadlj

    It would be nice if factories and their workforces were flexible enough to only make enough cars to meet the demand of the often volatile market. That way, when times are lean and demand is low, both parties are prepared; they have an actual plan.

    What sense does it make to keep factories running when there’s no one to buy the cars they’re making? I understand factory workers need steady work, but they’re not doing themselves any favors if that steady work leads to gross oversupply.

  • avatar
    Pastor Glenn

    You’re right, philadlj, and if you look back to “Government Motors” prior to the bankruptcy, you’d see many fully paid UAW types sitting around plants playing cards and collecting full paychecks, plus earning a good pension for the future. All of which is still in place, is it not?

    Which is obviously (duh!) one of the reasons that GM went bust.

    But the unions didn’t care then – and their ‘best buddies’ in the administration made sure to pay the union bosses off – but good – in handing them a portion of GM (and Chrysler) – while exclusing the legally required first-in-line status of bondholders.

    Which essentially means to anyone with 2 brain cells, that we obviously no longer live in a nation of law – but of corruption.

    But back to GM Opel – and the fact that they have exactly this situation coming up.

    Biggest question of the day: Will Government Motors even be extant in 2014? I’m beginning to wonder. The world economy is not exactly red-lining and moving along. It’s more like the ignition is turned off and the engine is still ‘dieseling’ along and rotating slowly, ready to finally stop….. obviously not a good thing.

    Time for another TTAC GM death watch, I’d say.

    • 0 avatar
      sunridge place

      ‘if you look back to “Government Motors” prior to the bankruptcy, you’d see many fully paid UAW types sitting around plants playing cards and collecting full paychecks, plus earning a good pension for the future. All of which is still in place, is it not?’

      Well, since you asked…it is not still in place…it ended 3 and a half years ago…but who is counting? A remarkably simple google search will show more articles on the topic than the one link below.

      http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aSycPoOxFsrg

      ‘Will Government Motors even be extant in 2014?’

      You should learn how to read a balance sheet….it might help you avoid needing to ask dumb questions like this.

    • 0 avatar
      APaGttH

      …prior to the bankruptcy, you’d see many fully paid UAW types sitting around plants playing cards and collecting full paychecks…

      It is worth noting, that during the economic downturn, Toyota had thousands of US employees, sitting around, watching PowerPoint decks on Toyota history, and planting flowers outside of the factories to make things look pretty, while receiving full benefits and pay, as part of their union grade, without the union dues, employee agreements.

      Job banking, like it or not, is pretty darn close to SOP in the auto industry.

      The big difference? Toyota had the cash to burn.

      • 0 avatar
        CJinSD

        The big difference is that Toyota was unencumbered by union work rules that would have prevented them from requiring their paid employees to work while the lines were idled. There is a huge difference between paying people to do nothing and paying them to do what is asked of them.

  • avatar
    Mike Kelley

    Speaking of Government Motors, here is an interesting article about the bailout and European problems:

    http://nlpc.org/stories/2012/08/16/auto-bailout-legacy-gms-european-nightmare


Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Subscribe without commenting

Recent Comments

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Staff

  • Contributing Writers

  • Jack Baruth, United States
  • Brendan McAleer, Canada
  • Marcelo De Vasconcellos, Brazil
  • Vojta Dobes, Czech Republic
  • Matthias Gasnier, Australia
  • W. Christian 'Mental' Ward, Abu Dhabi
  • Mark Stevenson, Canada
  • Cameron Aubernon, United States
  • J Emerson, United States