Don't Try This At Home: Another 80s Japanese Digital Dash Added To My Collection

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

There’s no way I’m going to spot a junked 80s Japanese car with the optional super-futuristic digital dash and not go back and buy that instrument cluster. So, now I’ve got a genuine digital dash collection going on, adding the Cressida cluster to my ’84 Nissan 300ZX Turbo cluster and my ’83 Mitsubishi Cordia Turbo cluster.

One great thing about Japanese cars of the 1980s and 1990s is that the instrument clusters are almost always easy to remove and install. There’s a fascia that comes off with a few screws, then another half-dozen screws hold the cluster in the dash.

On a Detroit car from this period, you’ll find all sorts of one-way plastic retainers that made it easy for the line workers to smack the cluster into place with a sharp blow from a rubber mallet, Mickey’s Big Mouth bottle, or whatever tool was handy. You’ll break all sorts of stuff while removing the thing, because the low-bidder plastic used for the retainers has a service life of maybe five years. Meanwhile, German clusters are even worse, with all manner of crazy hidden fasteners, in super-overkill quantities. I’ll stick with the Japanese stuff… for now.


Which reminds me: here’s how you remove the clock from a mid-70s Cadillac. No tools needed!

Unlike the 300ZX, the Cressida cluster’s harness doesn’t plug into sockets inside the dash. I cut the wires as far from the cluster as far as I could get away with. I’ll get a copy of the factory shop manual, which will give me the wiring diagram I need to control this cluster with an Arduino microcontroller. My collection still requires a Subaru XT digital dash. Did Honda do any digital dashes in the 1980s?

Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 29 comments
  • Beelzebubba Beelzebubba on Nov 22, 2012

    Honda didn't have a digital dash until the 2000 model year- the 2-seater Insight and S2000 sports car were both introduced that year with digital instruments. The '84-'88 Nissan 300ZX had the coolest looking digital dash, IMO. The big wave graph for the tach was particularly amusing and simultaneously, provided little to no useful information. My sister had a 1985 Z-car, white with red velour interior and it had the optional Electronics Package that included the digital dash, digital auto climate control and a bunch of other techno crap. I learned to drive in that car (it was a 5-speed stick) and took my driver's license test in it. So I have fond memories, even if the interior was the color of a slaughterhouse floor! Nissan offered a digital dash on the Maxima at least thru 1997-ish, but only on the GLE models. I think you're wise to avoid the domestics., They rarely worked properly when installed in the vehicles. My best friend's first car was a 1984 Chrysler Laser XE Turbo (twin to the Dodge Daytona) in Chocolate Brown and it had a digital dash and it talked (16 or so phrases/warnings, such as 'door ajar'). He got it in 1991 and it had over 150,000 miles on it, so it was pretty much worn out. It had a nasty habit of blowing coolant hoses loose on a regular basis, then it would announce "Engine Overheating! Engine Damage May Occur!" repeatedly....I heard that phrase so many times, and I would respond back to it with "No Shit!". It had an uncanny ability to state the blatantly obvious...god I hated that car!

  • Ric65704567 Ric65704567 on Feb 24, 2023

    A late response I know, the Honda city turbo had a digital dash in 1984/1985. So a very early contender.

  • Mebgardner I owned 4 different Z cars beginning with a 1970 model. I could already row'em before buying the first one. They were light, fast, well powered, RWD, good suspenders, and I loved working on them myself when needed. Affordable and great styling, too. On the flip side, parts were expensive and mostly only available in a dealers parts dept. I could live with those same attributes today, but those days are gone long gone. Safety Regulations and Import Regulations, while good things, will not allow for these car attributes at the price point I bought them at.I think I will go shop a GT-R.
  • Lou_BC Honda plans on investing 15 billion CAD. It appears that the Ontario government and Federal government will provide tax breaks and infrastructure upgrades to the tune of 5 billion CAD. This will cover all manufacturing including a battery plant. Honda feels they'll save 20% on production costs having it all localized and in house.As @ Analoggrotto pointed out, another brilliant TTAC press release.
  • 28-Cars-Later "Its cautious approach, which, along with Toyota’s, was criticized for being too slow, is now proving prescient"A little off topic, but where are these critics today and why aren't they being shamed? Why are their lunkheaded comments being memory holed? 'Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.' -Orwell, 1984
  • Tane94 A CVT is not the kiss of death but Nissan erred in putting CVTs in vehicles that should have had conventional automatics. Glad to see the Murano is FINALLY being redesigned. Nostalgia is great but please drop the Z car -- its ultra-low sales volume does not merit continued production. Redirect the $$$ into small and midsize CUVs/SUVs.
  • Analoggrotto Another brilliant press release.
Next