The Ultimate Rear-Engined Sedans: Tatra T613 And T700

Paul Niedermeyer
by Paul Niedermeyer

Looking at the VW EA128 concept instantly brings to mind that ultimate and final expression of the rear-engine sedan, the Czech Tatra T613. Introduced in 1974, it was a direct descendant of the T603, which in turn replaced the T600 and T87, dating back to the thirties ( my Tatra history is here).

The T613 was styled by Vignale of Italy, and had 3.5 and 4.3 liter DOHC aircooled V8s out back. As with all big Tatras, they were built in small numbers for the party bigwigs and industry bosses. After the collapse of the Iron Curtain, Tatra tried unsuccessfully to export, and compete with the German luxury brands.

This picture shows the extended version, with a highly luxurious rear compartment. Like Porsche, Tatra developed the rear-engined formula for long enough to overcome most of its quirks, but it was essentially a living fossil, although much loved and coveted by the loyal Tatra fans.

The T613 finally petered out in 1996, replaced by a less-than-successfully face-lifted version, the T700. Built only in very small numbers, it lasted until 1999. The direct lineage to the T77 of 1934 makes the big Tatras undoubtedly one of the longest continuously built cars. Just think: a dozen years ago, you could have bought a new Tatra instead of…

Paul Niedermeyer
Paul Niedermeyer

More by Paul Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 34 comments
  • Msquare Msquare on Sep 11, 2010

    Just for the record, Tatra cars were never their sole product. They started out as a maker of horse-drawn vehicles and produced their first car in 1897, making them the third-oldest active automaker after Daimler-Benz and Peugeot. The big cars we know about. The T600 Tatraplan was supposed to be their mainstream postwar model but the Commies decided to have Skoda build it, thus freeing Tatra to concentrate on trucks, buses and railroad equipment. Neither company (by then both nationalized) liked the idea and the T600 soon fell by the wayside. And yes, Tatra started building big cars again because Czech officials were dissatisfied with the Soviet crap. Apparently it's hard to find production numbers because many of them were reconditioned and put back into service. Tatra continues to build all-wheel-drive trucks.

  • Ra_pro Ra_pro on Sep 11, 2010

    Never in my wildest dreams would I have thought that Tatra would one day be considered a classic in the West. They were widely used as cabs (and still probably are) and above all official company cars in Czechoslovakia. Czech technology used to be among the very best in the world. A friend of mine used in his job Czech wood working machinery built in the late 1800 (189-something) in a Sheraton hotel in Toronto just a few years ago.

  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Off-road fluff on vehicles that should not be off road needs to die.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Saw this posted on social media; “Just bought a 2023 Tundra with the 14" screen. Let my son borrow it for the afternoon, he connected his phone to listen to his iTunes.The next day my insurance company raised my rates and added my son to my policy. The email said that a private company showed that my son drove the vehicle. He already had his own vehicle that he was insuring.My insurance company demanded he give all his insurance info and some private info for proof. He declined for privacy reasons and my insurance cancelled my policy.These new vehicles with their tech are on condition that we give up our privacy to enter their world. It's not worth it people.”
Next