By on May 22, 2010


Chrysler is doing better than GM. At least when it comes to winning arbitration cases brought by culled dealers. GM lost both cases brought against them. Chrysler bats much better.

Out of nine arbitration cases brought so far by eliminated dealers, Chrysler won 8, reports Automotive News [sub]. This week alone, Chrysler won three. The unlucky dealerships were Hinckley Dodge in Ogden, Utah, Tenafly Chrysler Jeep in Tenafly, N.J., and Midway Motors in Framingham, Mass. Out of the 9 cases  that have been decided, Florida’s Deland Dodge was the only dealer to prevail.

After going bankrupt, Chrysler terminated 789 dealers last year. In December, law was passed to give any rejected dealers of Chrysler or GM the right to seek arbitration.

Chrysler reinstated 36 dealers and sent letters offering reinstatement to 50 more. Approximately 400 Chrysler dealers initially went for arbitration. That number dwindled to less than 250, as cases were withdrawn, dismissed, or settled.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

6 Comments on “Chrysler 8, Dealers 1...”


  • avatar

    Culled? So the dealers arbitrating are animals that Chrysler is moving out? In my experience it was quite the opposite. Chrysler made the majority of these cuts with no justification whatsoever and they are still doing every thing they can to continue to put hard working Americans out of work for no reason. As a franchise, the more stores you have open, the product you move. The dealers pay for everything the franchise gives them. Chrysler begged for a bailout, promised their dealers if they helped with the bailout that they would be remembered and when they got the bail out they went back on their word and killed off thousands and thousands of jobs. Truth is, Jim Press and the members of the Obama task force that were in charge of this debacle need to be working at McDonalds…. And not in a management position.

  • avatar
    educatordan

    So did Chrysler get better lawyers than GM, did Chrysler have better rationale, is Chrysler more willing to fight harder and dirtier? Can anybody explain this?

  • avatar
    Lorenzo

    I’m thinking the way dealers were culled has an effect. Chrysler removed the signs, redistributed the inventory and left their dealers out of business or only a used car operation or with another, you know, foreign car dealership. One Dodge dealer near me simply expanded his Mazda operation. What are his chances of getting the Dodge dealership back?

    GM dragged out their process and their dealers had a chance to “alter the facts on the ground”, as well as keep making money to donate to people who could help them. They’re going into the hearings as going concerns that have probably spruced up their showrooms and maybe even cleaned up their act, if they had a bad rep before.

  • avatar

    Perhaps culled Chrysler dealers are on the sunny side of the street now. Not having to do business with a moribund company on the brink of insanity should be considered an asset.
    Insanity department: Think of their business plans to sell rebadged Lancias as Chryslers in the US and rebadged Chryslers as Lancias in Germany.
    Both brands are so exhausted, more dead than alive. Why don’t they start from scratch and create a new brand called “Wolpertinger”? Nobody would know what it is, nobody would be able to spell it, nobody would have met one, but at least there would be no bad experiences/feelings on the customer side.

  • avatar
    cdotson

    I have to wonder how many culled dealerships were members of a local chain that were compensated in other ways. In my area, there was a Dodge-only dealership that was terminated. The same chain name appears on several other dealerships, and a few months after Chrysler’s BK that chain’s Mazda store across town had moved to a brand-new building down the road and the former Mazda location was now a Chrysler/Dodge/Jeep store. The Dodge-only dealership was clearly listed on the “terminated dealership” list back during the bankruptcy, but I doubt any arbitration case would be necessary given that the chain gained in the exchange even though the store/location is no longer a new car dealership.

  • avatar
    cmus

    It could just be that there were a number of really awful C/J/D dealerships.

    For example, one of the Arbitration Losers: Manuel (not Manual) Dodge in Richardson, TX had a reputation of a “don’t go here” place. Lots of bait and switch sales tactics, not respecting incentives, questionable service, and at least one case that I know of, of them trying to jerk around a ChryCo/UAW employee on their personal discount.

    If there was ever a case of a dealership turning away customers from a manufacturer, this one seems to fit the bill.


Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Subscribe without commenting

Recent Comments

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Staff

  • Authors

  • Brendan McAleer, Canada
  • Marcelo De Vasconcellos, Brazil
  • Matthias Gasnier, Australia
  • J & J Sutherland, Canada
  • Tycho de Feyter, China
  • W. Christian 'Mental' Ward, Abu Dhabi
  • Mark Stevenson, Canada
  • Faisal Ali Khan, India