An Illustrated History Of Mid-Engined Corvette Concepts

Paul Niedermeyer
by Paul Niedermeyer

The history of mid-engined Corvette concepts is almost as old as the car itself, but even more colorful. Once the performance and racing potential of the ‘Vette was unleashed by its father, Zora Arkus Duntov, ambitious developments intended for the race track, Futurama, or the front pages of buff books speculating about the coming mid-engined production Corvette have never ended.

Duntov is shown here, proudly posing with his 1959 CERV (Chevrolet Engineering Research Vehicle) I, clearly a racing-oriented concept intended to test advanced designs and components for future use. The CERV’s independent rear suspension was adapted to the 1963 Corvette. It’s 350 hp 283 CI V8 featured aluminum block and heads, and fuel injection. A grand start to a long series of exciting Corvettes, even if they never made it into production.

There’s some question about the body on this CERV II from 1963-1964 (above), because there are pictures (very poor quality) of an earlier and different looking design. The CERV II was intended to be a competition car, and it had formidable performance from its revolutionary four wheel drive system. It was unusual, to say the least, with a Powerglide automatic on both ends of the 377 CI advanced V8, each one feeding its respective axle. It could top 200 mph, and knock of the zero to sixty in 2.8 seconds. In 1970, the CERV II had a 427 ZL-1 engine installed for tires tests. This radical concept is perhaps Duntov’s greatest achievement, heralding four-wheel drive in racing cars, and clearly influenced the Chaparral.

It’s a little sketchy as to what exactly defines a Corvette concept or not. The CERVs weren’t actually called Corvettes, nor was this ultra-low Astro 1 from 1968. But all the mid-engined concepts were in some related to the Corvette idea, this one exploring the outer limits of aerodynamic drag reduction for a sports car, as well as alternative power plants. The Astro 1 featured a modified Corvair flat six, making 240 hp.

The 1968 Astro II (XP-880) was the first real attempt to envision (and start rumors of) a mid-engined production Corvette. Chevrolet was now frantically following Ford, who had set the racing car world on its ear with the GT-40, of which a street version was available as the Mark III. The Astro II was cobbled together quickly, using the Tempest-sourced two-speed transaxle. That alone raised questions as to how serious Chevrolet really was, or if this was just ther first of numerous exercises in arousal without fulfillment.

The power struggles over the Corvette (as well as everything else) at GM were well known. Larry Shinoda had commissioned the Astro II, and was more worried about its looks and image. Zora Arkus Duntov didn’t buy into the modest two-speed Tempest transaxle in the least, and set about building his own answer to the mid-engined problem, the XP-882 of 1970 (above). He mated a Chevrolet 454 V8 with the Toronado’s FWD transaxle, which found a home under the louvered slats of this slightly cobbled-up but wicked-looking concept. It might have been one of Duntov’s rare missteps, as the whole powertrain weighed almost a thousand pounds. Ouch! So much for all those studies in lightweight alloy engines. But a lightweight engine solution was beckoning, just across the Atlantic. Meanwhile, the 454/Toro combination went on to have a useful life in GM’s motorhome.

GM liked extremes, and the jump from the monster XP-882 to the diminutive XP-897 2-rotor concept (above) certainly defined that. GM had signed a licensing agreement to build Wankel rotary engines, and the 1973 XP-897 was the first attempt to show off its potential. Unfortunately, it didn’t get the blood boiling too much, despite the handsome Pinifarina-built body. The little mill cranked out some 180-250 hp, but it was emissions and efficiency concerns that ultimately killed GM’s rotary program.

If the cute little 2-Rotor was wasn’t up to true Corvette status, then Duntov had the solution: mate two of the 292 cid spinners into one 585 cubic inch rotary monster, and reuse the Toronado transaxle and platform of the failed XP-882. But this time there was serious support for this to be a true Corvette replacement: GM would trump the world with the first production high-performance rotary sports car. Styling guru Bill Mitchel was personally involved, as were GM President Ed Cole and Sales exec Joe Pike. This was going to be the real thing! Seriously!

The early seventies were heady times for the experimental Corvette development group, with concepts flying out left and right. The XP-895 was an experiment in using aluminum extensively, although heavily based on the 2-Rotor. But it used a conventional (presumably aluminum) 400 cid V8, and weighed some 400 lbs less than its steel donor. But plain old cast-iron and fiberglass production Corvettes were flying out the dealers’ doors, so there was little incentive to rock the boat.

In 1986, the Indy Concept was intended to piggy-back on Chevy’s Indy-engine program, although not as in actually use that 2.65 turbocharged demon, but in the classic halo-car way. It used a 32 valve 5.7 liter engine, and showcased GM’s styling themes of the times, evoking the Aurora in particular.

The Indy concept was developed into the CERV III of 1990, designed to be (another) world-class top-level sports car, but this one was taken towards being more production ready (or am I just stirring up old rumors?). It’s 650 hp twin-turbo LT-5 engine left little doubt as to its capabilities. The car was built by Lotus, using carbon fiber extensively. Final cost estimates to produce it: $400k. Never mind; once again.

Paul Niedermeyer
Paul Niedermeyer

More by Paul Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 12 comments
  • Philadlj Philadlj on Mar 18, 2010

    A great post for anyone who blurts out "A mid-engine Corvette? Unthinkable blasphemy!" The Corvette name will survive conversion...the heritage is there, if only in concept form. But before '53, ask someone what a Corvette was, they'd say a small, maneuverable, lightly armed warship. How far it's come. FWIW, I'd love to see a functional CERV II do battle with a ZR1 on the track.

  • Blowfish Blowfish on Mar 19, 2010

    I read some where Duntov used to raced in a RS 550 Porsche and won her in Le mans ( from wikipedia )prior to join GM. The Oil Embargo killed the Rotor Vette. OT wonder if Merc had any plans to build the C111 rotor car then? If Merc would build C111 now I bet the line up won't be short either.

    • Porschespeed Porschespeed on Mar 19, 2010

      He raced several cars at LeMans. IIRC, he had 2 or 3 class wins, and drove a Porsche and something else. Don't recall what. He was officially prohibited from racing as GM wanted to keep their engineers alive. IIRC, he did some racing anyway. C111 was a concept/record car. Woulda bene neat to see it produced, but back then we didn't have income distribution screwed up to the point where there was a huge market for supercars.

  • W Conrad I'm not afraid of them, but they aren't needed for everyone or everywhere. Long haul and highway driving sure, but in the city, nope.
  • Jalop1991 In a manner similar to PHEV being the correct answer, I declare RPVs to be the correct answer here.We're doing it with certain aircraft; why not with cars on the ground, using hardware and tools like Telsa's "FSD" or GM's "SuperCruise" as the base?Take the local Uber driver out of the car, and put him in a professional centralized environment from where he drives me around. The system and the individual car can have awareness as well as gates, but he's responsible for the driving.Put the tech into my car, and let me buy it as needed. I need someone else to drive me home; hit the button and voila, I've hired a driver for the moment. I don't want to drive 11 hours to my vacation spot; hire the remote pilot for that. When I get there, I have my car and he's still at his normal location, piloting cars for other people.The system would allow for driver rest period, like what's required for truckers, so I might end up with multiple people driving me to the coast. I don't care. And they don't have to be physically with me, therefore they can be way cheaper.Charge taxi-type per-mile rates. For long drives, offer per-trip rates. Offer subscriptions, including miles/hours. Whatever.(And for grins, dress the remote pilots all as Johnnie.)Start this out with big rigs. Take the trucker away from the long haul driving, and let him be there for emergencies and the short haul parts of the trip.And in a manner similar to PHEVs being discredited, I fully expect to be razzed for this brilliant idea (not unlike how Alan Kay wasn't recognized until many many years later for his Dynabook vision).
  • B-BodyBuick84 Not afraid of AV's as I highly doubt they will ever be %100 viable for our roads. Stop-and-go downtown city or rush hour highway traffic? I can see that, but otherwise there's simply too many variables. Bad weather conditions, faded road lines or markings, reflective surfaces with glare, etc. There's also the issue of cultural norms. About a decade ago there was actually an online test called 'The Morality Machine' one could do online where you were in control of an AV and choose what action to take when a crash was inevitable. I think something like 2.5 million people across the world participated? For example, do you hit and most likely kill the elderly couple strolling across the crosswalk or crash the vehicle into a cement barrier and almost certainly cause the death of the vehicle occupants? What if it's a parent and child? In N. America 98% of people choose to hit the elderly couple and save themselves while in Asia, the exact opposite happened where 98% choose to hit the parent and child. Why? Cultural differences. Asia puts a lot of emphasis on respecting their elderly while N. America has a culture of 'save/ protect the children'. Are these AV's going to respect that culture? Is a VW Jetta or Buick Envision AV going to have different programming depending on whether it's sold in Canada or Taiwan? how's that going to effect legislation and legal battles when a crash inevitibly does happen? These are the true barriers to mass AV adoption, and in the 10 years since that test came out, there has been zero answers or progress on this matter. So no, I'm not afraid of AV's simply because with the exception of a few specific situations, most avenues are going to prove to be a dead-end for automakers.
  • Mike Bradley Autonomous cars were developed in Silicon Valley. For new products there, the standard business plan is to put a barely-functioning product on the market right away and wait for the early-adopter customers to find the flaws. That's exactly what's happened. Detroit's plan is pretty much the opposite, but Detroit isn't developing this product. That's why dealers, for instance, haven't been trained in the cars.
  • Dartman https://apnews.com/article/artificial-intelligence-fighter-jets-air-force-6a1100c96a73ca9b7f41cbd6a2753fdaAutonomous/Ai is here now. The question is implementation and acceptance.
Next