Ford Sharpens Its Edge

by Edward Niedermeyer

Published: February 10th, 2010

As our recent compact-ish CUV sales snapshot shows, Ford’s Edge has been losing its edge with consumers. And not to better looking cars with better ideas and more talent, but to its older brand-mate, the Escape. In order to keep up with its country cousin, the Edge has been updated for 2011, to offer a more contemporary corporate look, new powertrains and more. Where once only a 3.5 liter V6 (285 hp) was available, a more powerful 3.7 (305 hp) and the first US application of the EcoBoost 2.0 turbo four-cylinder (no stats released yet) are now optional. Where once the “Sport” trim was barely distinguishable, it now gets 22-inch rims and a blacked-out grille. And where standard models once sported ridiculously cheesy chrome grilles, the new 2011 Ford Edge now has an updated, yet equally giant and cheesy chrome grille. Because you can’t win them all.

#2011FordEdge #Cuv #Edge #Ford #NewCars

Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 74 comments

Shaker on Feb 11, 2010

Hopefully, this is an improvement over the 2007 SEL Edge that Consumer Reports trashed. For me, it's a bit too heavy (4500lbs w/3.5V6) to be considered in the same class as the Equinox - closer to a Santa Fe.

Like Reply
Accs on Feb 13, 2010

Hmmmm.. This is a problem that doesn't take rocket science. My wife has a hunger for these things.. but the analytical side of me doesn't understand the point. Ya got the Escape, the Edge, the Flex and the Exploder. Each.. is within 500lbs of each other. Each has a 6cycl. Each can hold 6 pass, with the Flex and the Exploder being made for 8.. if you drop the back seats.. (and sit on the gas tank.) But honestly.. Whats the reason to buy one.. over the other. And I know.. Toyota has the same issue, only that's more compounded. (if one is on recall.. just dump it for one that isn't. -- HAHA) Its getting to the point that the Escape is as big as the last gen Exploder is (forget the comments about model bloat.) Exploder and Flex will be competing DIRECTLY (if only MARKETING from FORD and or the MEDIA could MAKE A PROPER AND CORRECT designation FOR WHAT A SUV v CUV is.) Clue.. one WAS built on the Ranger frame.. then on the F150 frame = SUV = body on frame. Other was built on the S60-80 frame. = CUV = CAR unibody. And the sport package on these things.. has been what it will always be. A tape and badge package.. only now it has a set of wheels and special paint. -- so no real delineation to what SPORT is. Then again.. a vehicle of this heft.. shouldn't SPORT anything.

Like Reply

Recent Comments

Redapple2 Love the wheels
Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Off-road fluff on vehicles that should not be off road needs to die.
Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Saw this posted on social media; “Just bought a 2023 Tundra with the 14" screen. Let my son borrow it for the afternoon, he connected his phone to listen to his iTunes.The next day my insurance company raised my rates and added my son to my policy. The email said that a private company showed that my son drove the vehicle. He already had his own vehicle that he was insuring.My insurance company demanded he give all his insurance info and some private info for proof. He declined for privacy reasons and my insurance cancelled my policy.These new vehicles with their tech are on condition that we give up our privacy to enter their world. It's not worth it people.”