By on February 17, 2010

The Arizona Senate Public Safety and Human Services Committee approved legislation last Wednesday that would substantially expand the size and scope of the photo enforcement program in the state. Lawmakers voted 6-1 to approve legislation allowing the use of automated ticketing machines for a number of new types of violations. Committee Chairman Linda Gray (R-Phoenix) sponsored the legislation after becoming an enthusiastic supporter of cameras.

“I have come to understand with the data that has come in photo radar has provided for safer highways,” Gray said. “So I have a different perspective today than when I first learned of what photo radar is doing.”

Although Gray introduced the legislation claiming it would “reform” the photo enforcement program, the measure was in fact drafted by Redflex Traffic Systems, a firm based in Australia. The company listened to lawmaker complaints and included some mild changes that would not affect the company’s existing practice, such as a change in the signage requirements. The legislation also included a number of items of direct financial interest to the company.

“We appreciate senator Gray for working with us,” Redflex lobbyist Mike Williams said. “We’ve worked with legislators for the past three years.”

Under the current program, for example, a vehicle must be accused of traveling 11 MPH above the speed limit before Redflex can mail a photo citation. The Redflex legislation eliminates this buffer and allows the issuance of tickets for driving as little as 1 MPH over the limit in either a school zone or highway work zone. Signage requirements are gutted by a provision that allows photo radar warning signs to be left up for up to 24 hours when no photo radar is in use. The bill also eliminates the requirement that photo tickets be issued only for speed and red light violations, opening up the possibility that such tickets could be issued for cell phone and other violations. The initial draft of the legislation specifically included language that would allow Redflex to issue tickets to motorists accused of having lapsed insurance or vehicle registration.

Existing law gives photo enforcement companies sixty days to properly serve notice on a photo ticket recipient. The bill would double this to 120 days to address the fact that 73 percent of Arizona ticket recipients refuse to pay. The public’s widespread opposition to the program created the grassroots group which is circulating a referendum petition that would ban cameras throughout the state.

“It’s probably going on the ballot,” Williams said. “My understanding is they’re very active in gathering signatures.”

To combat the initiative, the committee also adopted a Redflex-sponsored measure, SCR1059, which would place the exact legislative language already adopted by the committee in SB1443 on the ballot.

“It mirrors what we just voted on — why do we need it?” state Senator Al Melvin (R-Tucson) asked. “It will be a ballot measure in competition with getting rid of them completely. It sounds like the electorate could be confused.”

Senators Melvin and Sylvia Allen (R-Snowflake) voted against SCR1059. A copy of the legislation is available in a 40k PDF file at the source link below.

Update: State Representative Frank R. Antenori (R-Tucson) issued a statement suggesting he was deceived by the lobbying effort on this legislation.

“In the case of SB1443, I was led to believe that the bill set guidelines for city, county and state use of photo radar and was a bill to significantly limit their use, not expand them,” Antenori wrote. “As I had time to review the full text of bill, I came to realize that I was not presented with all of the provisions contained in the bill… The bill does in fact expand the use of photo radar for the purpose of issuing citations for other infractions besides speeding. Therefore I am pulling my support from this bill and will actively work to defeat it in the State House of Representatives.”

Source: PDF File Senate Concurrent Resolution 1059 (Arizona Legislature, 2/17/2010)

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!


12 Comments on “Arizona Senate Panel Approves Photo Ticketing Expansion...”

  • avatar

    Vote them out of office!


  • avatar

    I do so love the idea of using traffic cameras for target practice.

  • avatar

    OK by me on the target practice. Fire away but please shoot straight and watch for ricochets.

    One thing our still-somewhat-free country allows us though (save for Virginia) is the use of radar detectors to sniff these cameras out.

    And they won’t work with laser – only radar. So stick ’em where you want and my Valentine One will stick ’em up your ass.

    This is so not like the state of Arizona. Maybe the legislature will remember where they are and do the right thing.

  • avatar

    Glad Aussies are writing our states’ traffic laws now.

  • avatar

    “This is so not like the state of Arizona.”

    Baloney. Arizona has been widely known for decades as having way too much law-enforcement interest in how fast people are driving, even on straight, empty desert roads. I agree, it doesn’t square with any image of the free and easy West that Arizona might wish to have….

  • avatar

    And yet I just heard this today about the AZ traffic cameras (audio and text):

    It’s hard to see what this Senate committee thinks that it’s up to.

  • avatar

    No wonder I haven’t visited Arizona since 2002. This is a perfect way to encourage tourism, guys!

  • avatar

    baseball bats, paint guns, flamethrowers. come on people, take it to the streets. A few Brits are getting it right with gas filled tires thrown over the cameras and lit

  • avatar

    You “I hate government” people do realize that Arizona’s legislature is 80% Republican and 20% Democratic. Arizona, a fast growing state, has been badly hurt by the recession and is deeply in debt. We didn’t do a good job of saving for a rainy day or bringing in new business beyond more house building.

    It seems that when Republicans can’t balance a budget they tax the poor with fees and fines.

    We don’t want to tax the rich with plain old income taxes because we do expect money from the rich to trickle down to us any day now:-)

    • 0 avatar

      This is EXACTLY what happened in Virginia a few years ago with the ridiculous $2,000 or so “abusive driver fees”. It was just a regressive tax increase coming out sideways–half the legislature made one of those ridiculous Club for Growth “no new taxes ever under any circumstances” pledges, but they still wanted transportation and education funding. So we got stuck with a fee that was later found to be unconstitutional, anyway.

  • avatar

    Did you see the DPS Budget report on how much $$$ the Vendors are making on this? Check it out here:

    What do you think about the numbers?

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • Adam Tonge: All future Jags will have a hybrid option, so it would have that too…
  • legacygt: $32K is about 50% more than I would have thought this car would be. I have a tendency to look outside a...
  • JMII: I often get Kias or sister Hyundia’s as rentals because they typically come with XM activated at Hertz....
  • Flybrian: Kyree got it. Retired boomer or a foreigner.
  • ajla: The XK went out like a Jaguar. No reason to bring it back so it can suffer the indignity of a standard 2.0T,...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote


  • Contributors

  • Matthew Guy, Canada
  • Ronnie Schreiber, United States
  • Bozi Tatarevic, United States
  • Chris Tonn, United States
  • Corey Lewis, United States
  • Mark Baruth, United States
  • Moderators

  • Adam Tonge, United States
  • Corey Lewis, United States