By on January 22, 2010

Now that Japan has said kankei nai ne (who cares, not worth the trouble) and opened their cash for clunkers program to American imports, even if they did not go through mandatory homologation, and even if they weren’t rated by the Japanese government to get 35.5 mpg or better, which car is the first to qualify? You are looking at it – very closely. It’s a, it’s a, it’s a …

It’s a SUV! To be exact, it’s a Jeep Patriot. Chrysler Japan announced that it will roll out on Feb. 1 the first American vehicle eligible for the Japanese government subsidy for new-car purchases. The new Jeep Patriot sport utility vehicle (some might debate that moniker) will get 10.6km on a liter of gasoline.  Says the Nikkei: “Although the government relaxed the eligibility requirements for imported vehicles, the new Patriot would qualify even under the previous standards.” See? Where there is a will, there is no need to make a big fuss.

According to the Nikkei, the Jeep will do its patriotic duty with a 2.3-liter, 4-cylinder, 16-valve engine. The suggested retail price starts at 2.91 million yen. That’s 2.66 million yen for you, if you scrap your 13 year or older vehicle. Now let’s see, how many will change hands to help the trade imbalance?

16 Comments on “First American To Break Japanese Trade Barrier!...”


  • avatar
    threeer

    Easy answer…not enough!

  • avatar
    Paul W

    “10.6km on a liter of gasoline”

    Us fans of the metric system but with no math skills are still confused! Is that about 7 l/100 km?

  • avatar
    OldandSlow

    That vehicle is a piece of crap. I hope the Japanese avoid it like one would the plague. The Toyota RA-4 and Nissan X-Trail are starting to look good.

  • avatar
    superbadd75

    Giving Cash for Japanese Clunkers money toward the purchase of these things still won’t help. The Japanese consumers have had superior domestic product for years, why would they buy a Jeep Patriot? I do like the idea that some American cars will be included in this program though, because now when those cars are avoided, U.S. automakers can’t use the excuse that they weren’t allowed to participate. It will be even more proof that what our domestics are putting out there isn’t good enough.

  • avatar
    Truckducken

    No, it’s about 7 liters per 74.2 km.

  • avatar
    john.fritz

    A little more than 25 miles per gallon. 25.3328076922 miles to be exact.

    About 3 miles per gallon more than my ’94 Crown Vic gets on the turnpike running 75mph or thereabouts.

  • avatar
    geggamoya

    It’s about 25 US MPG, 30 Imperial MPG, or 9,4l/100km. So not particularly good.

  • avatar
    ClutchCarGo

    I wouldn’t be surprised if someone from the Japanese govt or a Japanese mfr quietly arranged for a handful of US vehicles, including a Patriot or two, to be purchased in order to demonstrate that there’s no institutional effort to prevent US imports under the program.

  • avatar
    Garrick Jannene

    I know of no Patriots with a 2.3L engine. They either have a 2.4L or 2.0L World engine, or a 2.0L VW TDI.

  • avatar

    The Jeep Patriot has seen some significant issues with body seal leaks recently because of poorly-fitting body panels and Chrysler’s trademark lack of care in assembly. Not just in sunroofs either, there are reports of tubing disconnects at door panels, overhead dome lights that squirt water if tall objects hit the roof accidentally, and poorly-closing rear hatches that allow water in unless shut perfectly dead-center.

    It’s got so bad that I got spooked from even considering one. Almost literally every other comment on the Jeep Patriot enthusiasts’ forum is about some kind of interior water leak.

    Methinks this is not the kind of vehicle you’d want in tsunami-plagued Japan.

    I certainly hope we can bring over better products than this to sell in the Japanese market. The Patriot looks cool and has a lot of good points but it’s just no match for the JDM makers.

  • avatar
    Robert.Walter

    I thought C4C was supposed to get the clunkers off the streets, not add to them!

  • avatar
    AccAzda

    WHOOOHOOOO
    Another WINNER for CHRAPSLER…

    Always thrills me to know.. that Japanese are going to think of Jeeps.. (especially this one) as gutless POS.

    Meantime…
    AMERICANS DO TOO!!

    HAHAH!

  • avatar
    kurkosdr

    Us fans of the metric system but with no math skills are still confused! Is that about 7 l/100 km?

    Use google

    http://www.google.com/search?q=L%2Fkm+to+mpg&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:el:official&client=firefox-a

  • avatar
    brandloyalty

    One reason to justify the Patriot’s existence is the availability of a single extra-low gear. That makes it one of two cuv’s in North America with that feature. But Japan has all sorts of very compact suv’s and similarly capable 4wd vans, with full low ranges, turbo diesels etc. So the Patriot has nothing positive to distinguish itself from Japanese products in Japan.

  • avatar
    gsnfan

    Why a Jeep Patriot? It’s not even that fuel-efficient.

  • avatar

    Metric fuel economy is expressed in l/100 km. That makes it easier to compare apples with apples, unlike mpg or km/l. A car that does 3.0 l/100 km is three times more efficient than a car that does 9 l/100 km.

    10.6 km per litre is 9.4 l/100 km, or about 24.9 US mpg. Which is not very good for a car that has a 2.3 litre engine.

    My wife’s auto Honda Jazz (Fit) currently averages 5.6 l/100 km over the 14,000 km we’ve done in the year we’ve owned it. It’s easy to tell that our car is nearly twice as efficient as this heap of junk.


Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

You can also login using Facebook Connect. Connect with Facebook

Subscribe without commenting

Recent Comments

  • Re: Blind Spot: America’s New Motor City

    tresmonos - carbiz’s satire is about as polar as your favoring of Edmunds and TrueCar. Both companies provide a great web based tool for consumers. Trulia...
  • Re: The Unimportance of Speed

    MarkP - Absolutely right. The only thing all that power is really good for is passing a slow-moving truck on a winding road. But you don’t really even need that much of it...
  • Re: The Unimportance of Speed

    Roberto Esponja - If I had money (and the storage space) for an extra car, the Miata would be it. Until something better comes along.
  • Re: The Unimportance of Speed

    mitchw - Oh, I can play the numbers game with my Miata. Try perfect balance, not just 50/50 but a low polar moment and low center of gravity. This thing knows how to yaw and...
  • Re: The Unimportance of Speed

    fredtal - So maybe now we can put to rest all those comments about how “fast” the Camry is.
  • Re: New or Used: Yo Dawg, Listen Up this Time!

    toplessFC3Sman - 1st gen Pontiac Vibe/Toyota Matrix – either 180 hp 1.8 & 6-spd manual or 140ish hp 1.8 & AWD, maybe manual, plus the price of the...
  • Re: Massachusetts Right to Repair Law Left Senate

    NMGOM - To “aristurtle”… ;. Very good points. And I’d like to elaborate on one in particular: 1) You said, “What this comes down...
  • Re: New or Used: Yo Dawg, Listen Up this Time!

    tonyola - mile·age n. 1. Total length, extent, or distance measured or expressed in miles. 2. Total miles covered or traveled in a given time. 3. The amount of...
  • Re: The Unimportance of Speed

    tonyola - That’s why my 1984 CRX 1.5 was endless fun. With 76 horsepower, I wasn’t going to win many stoplight challenges, even by 1984 standards. However, it was a...
  • Re: What’s Wrong With This Picture: Ontogeny Recapitulates Phylogeny Edition

    EChid - He didn’t say it wasn’t justified. He just said people who care about looks only would thing the G...

 

Staff