By on March 18, 2009

Some cities are refusing to comply with a new Georgia law mandating a one-second increase in the duration of the yellow warning period at intersections equipped with red light cameras. At least seven cities that made the required timing increase in January experienced an immediate 80 percent decrease in the number of violations. Of these, Duluth, Lilburn, Norcross, Snellville and Suwanee put the brakes on their red light camera programs after the data made it clear that the programs would no longer make money. Rome is now leaning toward dropping its program as well.

Cities like Atlanta, however, insist on maintaining their photo enforcement system. A spokesman for the city Department of Public Works confirmed to TheNewspaper that yellow times were not increased at any of the eight intersections that use red light cameras. As a result, half of the city’s photo enforced intersections actually saw an increase, not a decrease, in violations in the space of a year.

The number of tickets issued at Spring Street and North Avenue jumped from 415 in January 2008 to 504 in January 2009. During the same period, tickets increased from 37 to 46 at Piedmont Road and Monroe Drive, from 72 to 84 at Buford Highway and Lenox Road. Tickets doubled from 100 to 206 at Cleveland and Metropolitan.

State Senator Jack Murphy (R-Cumming), sponsor of the amendment that created the yellow time provision, vowed to get to the bottom of Atlanta’s refusal.

“If they’re not doing it, I’m going to find out why,” Murphy told TheNewspaper. “Longer yellow was the intention of the bill. They set the yellow too low — especially for left turns.”

Other cities like Roswell admit to ignoring the longer yellow requirement because the enforcement mechanism built into the law will not take effect until next year. In January, the legislature gave the Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) authority to deny a permit to operate red light cameras to any city that fails to adhere to a number of legal requirements, including signal timing.

Under the law, cities can operate without these permits until January 1, 2010. GDOT, moreover, plays no active role in monitoring the compliance of the twenty-three cities that use red light cameras. Instead, the agency relies on the public to uncover any problems.

“Complaints about signal timing related to yellow clearance intervals should come directly to the Georgia Department of Transportation,” State Traffic Engineer Keith Golden told TheNewspaper. “Our legislators… have tasked GDOT to be the agency responsible for monitoring the implementation of this countermeasure.”

Senator Murphy intends to follow up with Golden to see why he is not doing more to ensure cities comply the longer yellow law. Golden suggested cities have an alternative if they do not wish to change their signal timing.

“It was suggested that the engineering calculated minimum values are just that — a minimum and that we should not be designing for a minimum value if there is going to be a regulatory event tied to the value,” Golden explained. “If a local jurisdiction determines that for operational issues they need the lower values — there is no requirement that they install a red light running camera.”

The Impact of Longer Yellow

Exceeding the minimum value by a second has decreased the desirability of running red light cameras by about 80 percent in compliant cities. Suwanee was first to end ticketing on January 19 after issuing just 68 citations under lengthened yellow (the equivalent of 110 tickets per month). This compared unfavorably to the 2008 average of 580 tickets per month which helped the city land $414,540 in revenue. In Duluth, the program issued 652 tickets in October compared to 215 last month.

As a result, Duluth will let its contract for the program — which generated 10,386 tickets worth $727,020 last year — expire in May. In Dalton, 122 tickets were issued at the intersection of Highway 41 and Shugart Road after the light was increased in January. The previous year, the number of monthly tickets averaged 460.

“The additional time on the yellow light has significantly reduced the number of citations because motorists have adequate time to get through the intersection,” state Representative Barry Loudermilk (R-Cassville), primary sponsor of the new legislation, wrote in his weekly column. “Since most of these cities have stated that safety was the primary reason they installed red light cameras, they should be thrilled that citations have been significantly reduced; however, many are pulling the cameras out because they are no longer making a profit.”

North Carolina saw a similar reaction in 2007 when the state supreme court upheld a decision directing all of the profit in red light camera programs out of city general funds and into the state school system (read final opinion). Charlotte, Fayetteville, Greenville, Greensboro, High Point, Raleigh and Rocky Mount shut down their red light camera programs in the wake of the court’s action.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!


13 Comments on “Editorial: Georgia Cities Ignoring Extended Yellow Law...”

  • avatar

    Good for state Senator Murphy. I hope he nails them.

  • avatar

    Bravo, Bravo, Bravissimo!

  • avatar

    Longer yellows are a great idea, let’s do it nationwide.

  • avatar

    This just in…the character Fillmore from the movie Cars put in charge of yellow light timing…

    Fillmore: [looking at a stoplight blinking yellow] I’m tellin’ you, man, every third blink is slower.
    Sarge: The ’60s weren’t good to you, were they?

  • avatar

    They should have ordered the cities to also refund all the fees collected…

    Although now at least the judge can have the city officials jailed for contempt.

  • avatar

    Atlanta’s arrogance doesn’t surprise me. Not meaning to get off-topic, but Atlanta pays fines to EPA rather than clean up the Chattahoochee River because it’s cheaper that way. They can’t balance the budget so they screw the environment (or the motorists, in the yellow light case.) The attitude is, “Damn the law, we’ll just pay the fines.”

    I hope Senator Murphy nails them.

  • avatar

    Good for him!

    If you live in an area where they have alot of these cameras you should look into getting a gps red light camera detector – search on Amazon for one. Ihave a gps angel and it’s been great.

  • avatar

    Hurray someone trying to stop the corruption in this state. Nail them to the wall, I’m tired of these clowns always coming after our wallets because they can’t stick to a budget.

  • avatar

    Anyone thinking about getting between a jurisdiction and a revenue stream had better have second thoughts and maximum reservations. They will cage-fight anyone getting in their way of pulling in a buck.

    Be ready for a no-holds-bared, wholly dishonest knockdown, drag-out battle. They know this game well, placing you at a horrible disadvantage before you even start.

    A word to the wise: No joke; you’ve been warned.

  • avatar

    I’ve overheard that Duluth’s traffic enforcement finest have a nick name:

    Duluth’s Hitler Youths – “Ich bin das Gesetz!”

  • avatar

    I like it when intersections have a sign 500 feet ahead warning the light is red. They should have countdown timers at 500 feet too so you know the light would change and could prepare to slow down. I mean, it’s about safety right?

    Imagine a world where no one ever ran a light. Sounds financially disappointing to most cities.

  • avatar

    It is a simple rule that if you set the yellows according to well established traffic engineering standards, you don’t have much violation, certainly not enough to justify the project.

    Shortening the yellows is the same as underposting the speed limits to say, 55 on a road where it is designed for 70 and the traffic flow is 65-75.

    When the revenue drops because “everyone knows where the camera is”, magically the yellows shorten, but no one can ever figure out who did it. (the private contractors, of course) This alone is the reason why only LAW ENFORCEMENT PROFESSIONALS should give out tickets.

    No Camera every stopped a drunk or caught a fugitive. What cameras tell us is that the offense is serious enough to send you a bill but not serious enough to actually stop you.

  • avatar

    Someone should correlate the revenue lost for the additional one second to the money required to pay the additional medical and insurance bills (not to mention lives lost) due to shortening a yellow by one second. I suspect you will find the medical and insurance costs overwhelm the revenue gained.

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • CRConrad: Those numbers feel a bit like the “Tax Horesepower” the French, and before them the Brits, used...
  • CRConrad: Bah, with CCs you get so much more! For example, who wants a lousy 454-ci engine when you can have a mighty...
  • threeer: I *think* Buick largely exists now to sell Chinese-made “American” cars to the Chinese…and...
  • TW5: Don’t stick you neck out for CR. There are too many people willing to pull the lever on the guillotine. CR...
  • CRConrad: Yeah, the “190” was actually the first “liar” model in that sense. That’s...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote


  • Contributors

  • Matthew Guy, Canada
  • Ronnie Schreiber, United States
  • Bozi Tatarevic, United States
  • Chris Tonn, United States
  • Corey Lewis, United States
  • Mark Baruth, United States
  • Moderators

  • Adam Tonge, United States
  • Corey Lewis, United States