By on November 11, 2008

The auto industry and auto exports have top billing in China’s current 5 Year Plan. (Yes, for sentimental reasons, they still have one of those.) Yet when it comes to the car export part, China is still light-years away from fulfilling their master plan. The Vice Director General of the Department of Mechanic, Electronic and Hi-Tech Industry, Ministry of Commerce, made the startling admission. “China’s auto exports are still in the early stage, leaving a large gap in global exports,” Zhou Shijie told Xinhua. Translation: China’s auto exports are in the doghouse of the export powerhouse. “It is difficult for export companies to master the vehicle entry policy in foreign countries.” Translation: Our cars failed miserably in crash tests, we have trouble with pesky U.S. FMVSS and European ECE regulations, which we can barely comprehend (let alone satisfy). We’re fed up and we’re not gonna take it. No, we’re not gonna take it. Uh-oh.

Only fools with think that China will throw in the towel on car exports. Especially not while Western auto makers have trouble staying alive. Mr. Zhou didn’t say that, but it goes without saying. (Although I just said it.) The market weaknesses may be China’s grand opening. Zhou announced that “China’s Ministry of Commerce will take nine measures to support domestic auto companies to enlarge auto exports.” He didn’t elaborate what those measures may be, but it’s a fair assumption that more attention will be given to crash tests, while whole car companies crash in Western markets. And there will be eight measures more. When the auto industry upturn turns up, China’s automotive exports will be back, with a vengeance.

But wait, there’s more: At the same conference where Zhou admitted defeat, Ivan Hodac, Secretary-General of the European Automobile Manufacturers Association (ACEA), said that the European Union expects China to relax. Namely China’s insistence on 50:50 joint ventures for auto makers. They should also relax their CCC regulations, a Chinese addition to the  FMVSS/ECE alphabet soup, and widely seen as Chinese water torture to drive foreign importers to tears.  Xinhua quotes a faceless “industry expert” who calls Ivan’s demands “excessive.”  But there might be a deal in the works.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

5 Comments on “Chinese Government: Our Car Exports Suck...”

  • avatar

    First and foremost the heading of the article misleading: all Chinese exports suck. There are no “pants regulations”, since you can’t kill yourself and family with uneven length pants and shoes can hurt only one foot at a time (well mine manage to hurt both, but the dominant pain overtakes minor one).
    I try to avoid buying anything made in China, but it is rather difficult and expensive. And in truth, the rest of the world lowered it standards in response to Chinese “quality”. Lets hope that cars will hold the line against Chinese mediocrity.

  • avatar

    There are no “pants regulations”

    @autonut: I went out and tested that, the low temperatures in Beijing be damned. I was arrested immediately for indecent exposure. When I explained that it was a scientific test, they sent me home with a warning and a blanket.

  • avatar

    Ho – Lee – Crap!

    I think my favorite part of that video is right after the airbag goes off, and the steering column is PUSHED into the dummy’s FACE. That screams quality.

    Chinese workmanship claims more crash test dummies. But, in all fairness and with translation from English to Chinese (and vice versa) being so difficult, they probably think those innocent dummies are the cause for “Mmm Mmm Mmm Mmm.”

    And for you naysayers, check out the English version of a Chinese automaker’s website…when a sentence pops up that a car “packs a visual wallop,” you know something got lost in translation!

  • avatar

    That video actually has a sub story. It’s the infamous “Landwind” video. Test conducted by the ADAC, the German version of the AAA and published shortly before the first Chinese 4WD was to appear at the Frankfurt Auto Show. There were persistent rumors that interested circles in the German auto industry had paid for the test, and that the car was smashed at a higher speed than proscribed in the standard. In a later test, the car did ok, but the damage was done. A similar tragic experience was had by the Brilliance, a car made by BMWs Chinese joint venture partner. Also tested before the auto show. A re-test likewise ok. Nevertheless, a German marketing expert who was asked for an opinion on what to do with the imported Brilliances recommended: “Put them on a boat and set course towards the next hurricane.”

  • avatar

    Who says you don’t get what you pay for?

    Well, unless you are buying a new German car.

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Subscribe without commenting

Recent Comments

  • Re: Reader Review: 2014 Cadillac ATS

    bunkie - Great review. I, too, found the driving dynamics of the luxury trim with the 2.0T to be really impressive. To me, this is the sweet spot in this car. Forgo the...
  • Re: Junkyard Find: 2001 Pontiac Aztek AWD

    jaydez - My condo complex uses the same parking tags! We picked those because they are the biggest pain in the ass to get off. People stop breaking the rules when it...
  • Re: Reader Review: 2014 Cadillac ATS

    bigtruckseriesreview @ Youtube - I’m very happy that Cadillac has made their new cars spacious and luxurious, even at the expense of power. #1 The interior quality...
  • Re: Sources: Three Challenges Behind Tesla Model X Delay

    CoreyDL - A good point. The doors look so cool that if they were useful and practical, they’d be on normal cars by now. The S-Class would...
  • Re: Junkyard Find: 2001 Pontiac Aztek AWD

    RangerM - I remember seeing a woman win one of these on television. When it was revealed what she’d won, the deflated look on her face was something that GM...
  • Re: Reader Review: 2014 Cadillac ATS

    hubcap - To Deadweight, Fire for effect!
  • Re: Reader Review: 2014 Cadillac ATS

    danio3834 - I’d opt for the 2.0T as well. I really want to crank up the boost on one of these f*ckers. Boy was that fun in the LNF equipped cars.
  • Re: Junkyard Find: 2001 Pontiac Aztek AWD

    cbrworm - I’m glad I don’t live somewhere where you are likely to have your car towed with two day notice due to flat tires on one side.
  • Re: Junkyard Find: 2001 Pontiac Aztek AWD

    sirwired - Really, I thought the car was a pretty cool idea. The design wasn’t very attractive (although personally I don’t think it was as bad as all the...
  • Re: Reader Review: 2014 Cadillac ATS

    ltcmgm78 - Thanks, carguy! This was a great review. The local Cadillac dealer has a stack of these ATS models. Sounds like I’d pass. SAAB still runs fine. For now....

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote


  • Contributing Writers

  • Jack Baruth, United States
  • Brendan McAleer, Canada
  • Marcelo De Vasconcellos, Brazil
  • Vojta Dobes, Czech Republic
  • Matthias Gasnier, Australia
  • W. Christian 'Mental' Ward, Abu Dhabi
  • Mark Stevenson, Canada
  • Cameron Aubernon, United States
  • J Emerson, United States