Cassandra Watch: Keith Crain Edition

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

My, how things change. Just two short months ago, Automotive News [sub] publisher and editorial director Keith Crain was asking us to redefine our very notion of what an automaker is in order to justify Chrysler’s continued existence. “Who knows?” mused Crain. “Before too long, Chrysler might just do some engineering and perhaps a bit of design and let someone else build its vehicles. Chrysler would become a marketer rather than a manufacturer, sort of like Home Depot.” Fast forward through two months of bad news, and suddenly Crain has realized that just maybe it’s more likely that Chrysler will die rather than challenge paradigms. And though his latest missive “Just Put Up A ‘For Sale’ Sign” is doom-and-gloomy enough to get him membership in our rapidly-growing Cassandra club, he makes sure blame goes where it belongs: the fools who were dumb enough to buy the mess the last time it was for sale.

Jump for the rest of the post.

Cerberus gets it right between the eyes, as Crain gives up on Chrysler’s paradgim-shifting potential. “Stephen Feinberg, head of Cerberus Capital Management has been losing an amount of money beyond even his worst imagination. Chrysler has cost him and his clients billions of dollars. They were cocky enough to think that they were going to make billions without batting an eye. They didn’t know how ill-equipped they were to run an automobile company.” This is either the moment for TTAC to defend the good, strong, honest hedge funds of America, or point out that Crain thought a Cerberus-run Chrysler heralded a brave new future for American automakers. So, what to do now that Crain believes the term “too big to fail” probably doesn’t describe the domestic auto business? Sell to the foreigners, is Crain’s weary advice, specifically the Chinese or Renault/Nissan. So what happened to “the U.S. automakers (being) the linchpin of a strong manufacturing industry in this nation”? Or was that only trotted out to justify the bailout? Anyone else feeling some editorial whiplash?

Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 4 comments
  • Brandon I would vote for my 23 Escape ST-Line with the 2.0L turbo and a normal 8 speed transmission instead of CVT. 250 HP, I average 28 MPG and get much higher on trips and get a nice 13" sync4 touchscreen. It leaves these 2 in my dust literally
  • JLGOLDEN When this and Hornet were revealed, I expected BOTH to quickly become best-sellers for their brands. They look great, and seem like interesting and fun alternatives in a crowded market. Alas, ambitious pricing is a bridge too far...
  • Zerofoo Modifications are funny things. I like the smoked side marker look - however having seen too many cars with butchered wire harnesses, I don't buy cars with ANY modifications. Pro-tip - put the car back to stock before you try and sell it.
  • JLGOLDEN I disagree with the author's comment on the current Murano's "annoying CVT". Murano's CVT does not fake shifts like some CVTs attempt, therefore does not cause shift shock or driveline harshness while fumbling between set ratios. Murano's CVT feels genuinely smooth and lets the (great-sounding V6) engine sing and zing along pleasantly.
  • JLGOLDEN Our family bought a 2012 Murano AWD new, and enjoyed it for 280K before we sold it last month. CVT began slipping at 230K but it was worth fixing a clean, well-cared for car. As soon as we sold the 2012, I grabbed a new 2024 Murano before the body style and powertrain changes for 2025, and (as rumored) goes to 4-cyl turbo. Sure, the current Murano feels old-school, with interior switchgear and finishes akin to a 2010 Infiniti. That's not a bad thing! Feels solid, V6 sounds awesome, and the whole platform has been around long enough that future parts & service wont be an issue.
Next