Cassandra Watch: Daniel Howes Edition
Like the gas price spike that helped launch the current industry death spiral, nobody saw a possible D3 bankruptcy coming. Well, outside of this little corner of the internet, anyway. But with the mainstream media catching wind of what we’ve been crying in the desert for years now, a number of well-known industry analysts are coming around to the notion that America may not have three big automakers anymore. Jalopnik’s Ray Wert was ahead of the (adjusted) curve, bellying up to the TTAC line (sorta) yesterday. Today, none other than Danny Howes of the Detroit News is playing Cassandra-come-lately as merger and bankruptcy rumors take industry-watchers by storm. To be fair, Howes isn’t blind to Detroit’s sins, and his columns have been taking an increasingly alarmist tone for some time now. But until this week he’s faced the strings and arrows of outrageous fortune with brave face and stiff upper lip. No longer.
In his latest column “One Of The Big Three May Not Survive,” Howes lays down the pom-poms and faces facts: Detroit is screwed, and none of the solutions will be convenient or easy. Howes says a potential GM-Chrysler would be a “neutron bomb,” eliminating thousands of jobs to keep hard assets and cash intact. He notes that “GM needs more brands, more plants and more dealers like it needs another credit crunch.” Finally he concludes “GM’s directors aren’t keen to embrace a Chrysler deal with Cerberus because they realize the remedy for what ails GM won’t come from swallowing a competitor. It’ll come from buying enough time to survive the imminent shakeout because — and I wish I could say otherwise — one of Detroit’s Big Three may not.” Don’t worry, Danny… you’ve tried to say otherwise for long enough.
More by Edward Niedermeyer
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- THX1136 What happened to the other companies that were going to build charging stations? Maybe I'm not remembering clearly OR maybe the money the government gave them hasn't been applied to building some at this point. Sincere question/no snark.
- VoGhost ChatGPT, Review the following article from Automotive News: and create an 800 word essay summarizing the content. Then re-write the essay from the perspective of an ExxonMobil public relations executive looking to encourage the use of petroleum. Ensure the essay has biases that reinforce the views of my audience of elderly white Trump-loving Americans with minimal education. Then write a headline for the essay that will anger this audience and encourage them to read the article and add their own thoughts in the comments. Then use the publish routine to publish the essay under “news blog” using Matt Posky listing the author to completely subvert the purpose of The Truth About Cars.
- VoGhost Your source is a Posky editorial? Yikes.
- Fed65767768 Nice find. Had one in the early-80s; loved it but rust got to it big time.Still can't wrap my head around $22.5K for this with 106,000 km and sundry issues.Reluctant (but easy) CP.
- El scotto err not be an EV but to own an EV; too much training this week along the likes of what kind of tree would be if you were a tree? Sorry. Bring back the edit function.
Comments
Join the conversation
I still think GM is doing some of this on purpose to stop the perpetual bleeding of self inflicted wounds i.e. retiree benefits, franchise laws, UAW rules, etc. They go broke, scare the gov't into changing legislation for them like eliminating franchise laws and union shop rules and eventually in the long term GM crawls back to a reasonable marketshare as a leaner, meaner corporate hunting dog. They can't continue to do business the same way as they have for 75-100 years and they know it. Going broke is the only way they can change the situation they are in. They can't move out of Michigan b/c the UAW agreements prob follow them everywhere. They can't get out from under benefit agreements. They can leave the states with union shop rules but the UAW would likely badly hobble GM at the same time in other GM plants.