Ford Dealers Fight Model E Sales Plans
Ford's plan to divide its dealers by type of combustion system -- Ford Blue for internal-combustion vehicles, Ford Pro for commercial, and Ford Model E for battery-electric vehicles -- has hit a snag.
At the annual dealer conference in Las Vegas, held back in September, Ford said it would have two Model E tiers: Model E Certified and Model E Certified Elite. Dealers had until Oct. 31 to decide which one they wanted to join, with the plan formally commencing on Jan. 1, 2024. Now, Ford has pushed the decision day back to Dec. 2 after dealers balked.
According to Automotive News, dealers are overall supportive of Ford's plans to sell EVs, but unhappy with the tiered system.
This is because Ford is requiring dealers to install EV chargers. Stores in the Certified tier are being asked to fork over a cool half-million dollars to install at least one DC fast charger that would put out at least 120 kW of juice and be publicly available. Certified Elite dealers would be asked to shell out $1.2 million bucks for two DC fast chargers that would be part of the Blue Oval network. Dealers are also unhappy with Ford because they won't be able to keep their allotted 25 EVs per year on the showroom floor, and because the company is insisting on no-haggle pricing.
Ford head honcho Jim Farley also wants dealers to try to save $2K in savings per vehicle so that the company's profit margins are closer to what Tesla sees.
Dealers, of course, see this as taking money out of their pockets.
Ford pushes back by saying it worked with dealers on the tiers and even created the lower tier specifically because of dealer feedback. But now that dealers are weighing cost against potential gain, they've started to worry the gain won't be worth it.
They're also concerned about franchise laws -- some, for example, are arguing that the 25-vehicle cap isn't allowed in their state. A few others seem to think that Ford shouldn't split up its sales by combustion type.
Ford, of course, says the program is legal.
Your author's take is that while it does seem odd for Ford to split EV sales off from sales of ICE vehicles -- and why do EV buyers get Certified program perks like loaner cars when their vehicles are in for service, while ICE customers might not? -- dealers are also, of course, going to look out for their own pocketbooks out of pure self-interest. So some pushback isn't shocking, and the OEM and its dealer group will have to work together to make this new program work. Oh, and Ford may have to assuage some local lawmakers, too.
[Image: Ford]
Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.
Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.
More by Tim Healey
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- Namesakeone It should be a name that evoques the wild west, that emphasizes the go-anywhere nature of how an SUV should be used. Something like a wild animal, maybe something like a horse. I've got it! How about . . . Mustang! Oh, wait. They already did that, didn't they?
- Slavuta There Used to be Pontiac Trans Sport.... That "Trans Sport" part has a totally new meaning these days
- 210delray You need to change the headline -- it's a 2025 model.
- Jeff How about Aspire for a new subcompact crossover from Ford because it aspires to be bigger and its buyers would aspire for a better vehicle if they could afford it.
- Jeff Carlos Travares wants to cut costs by 1/3. I don't see Chrysler or Dodge surviving too much longer especially since they are being literally starved for product. The success of the new Charger could extend Dodge a few more years but a failure might be a quick end to Dodge. I could see Stellantis moving more manufacturing for Jeep and Ram to Mexico which I believe will eventually be the only surviving brands of the old Chrysler. As for the Durango if it continues it will not be for too many more years it is an outdated product that I doubt will be redesigned especially when Jeep has a comparable product. Stellantis needs to address the high dealer inventory level by giving better incentives and low interest rates to clear excessive inventory.
Comments
Join the conversation
It is worded "Upto 25 units per Year" there is not even a guarantied 25 units.
Even if there is 25, at a Fixed Profit Margin of $5-6000/ unit. How many years does it take to pay back $1.2 Million?
Ford head honcho Jim Farley also wants dealers to try to save $2K in savings per vehicle so that the company's profit margins are closer to what Tesla sees.
Where is Musk's Dealer Group's Profit? Where is Musk's Dealer Group Asset should something go south, let's say like Chevrolet had with Bolt Battery Packs?
How in the Christ does it cost 1.2 million dollars for essentially a voltage stepper ?????????????