Report: Tesla Owners and Buyers Sour on Elon Musk

report tesla owners and buyers sour on elon musk


New reporting from Bloomberg suggests that potential Tesla buyers, as well as current Tesla owners, are souring on the brand because of the antics of Tesla boss Elon Musk.


The reporting cites studies that show owners are generally happy with the vehicles -- reliability problems aside -- but not so much with Musk and his public behavior.


We won't list all of his real and alleged shenanigans -- we don't have all day, and neither do you -- but just recently he's been accused of having an affair with the wife of one of Google's founders, he fathered children with one of his executives and tried to keep it quiet, he's been in engaged in a legal battle over his withdrawal from buying Twitter, and he's just generally been controversial over the years. This very website isn't short on both news articles that paint Musk in an unflattering light and critical op-eds.


“Elon has just soiled that brand for me so much that I don't even think I would take one if I won one,” James Jerry Stone, a Tesla intender, tells Bloomberg. “You have this guy who's the richest dude in the world, who has this huge megaphone, and he uses it to call somebody a pedophile who's not, or to fat-shame people, all these things that are just kind of gross.”


Of course, it's one thing for owners and/or potential buyers to say they'll shy away from the brand due to Musk -- and it's worth noting there are a lot more EV choices being offered from the other OEMs than there were just a few years ago -- and another for them to actually do it. Sales figures show that Tesla is still selling well.


Indeed, Tesla's success can also be attributed, at least in part, to Musk's social-media presence. His actions and tweets draw attention, both positive and negative, to the brand, and he's cultivated a large and loyal following on Twitter -- one that will leap to Tesla and Musk's defense whenever media is critical. This author knows -- Musk tweeted about this piece and TTAC's Twitter account was inundated with angry replies from aggrieved Tesla/Musk stans for days.


It's a unique position for a modern car company to be in. Most of the American public probably couldn't name the head of any other car company save maybe Mary Barra at GM. And no other current automaker boss generates attention or moves markets with their tweets. Nor, as far as I can tell, are car buyers turned off by the politics or personal life of any automotive executive except Musk.


I'd be shocked if anyone left a Chevrolet dealer because of something Barra said to the press or canceled a Ford Mustang Mach-E order because of something Jim Farley tweeted (and Farley once trolled Musk via Twitter). Tesla appears unique in this regard.


How much Musk's tweets and actions will hurt the brand remain to be seen. Even if a few owners don't re-up or a few potential customers stay away, the number might not be enough to put a true dent in Tesla sales.


That said, it seems that, for Tesla, "all attention is good attention" may no longer be the case. For perhaps the first time, less attention on Musk might be better for the Tesla brand.

[Image: Naresh111/Shutterstock.com]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 48 comments
  • Rick T. Rick T. on Aug 02, 2022

    I wonder what all those offended by Musk do for sports, music, and movie entertainment. Because if those same standards applied....

    • See 2 previous
    • Daniel J Daniel J on Aug 03, 2022

      I fundamentally think Bolton is a crook and a swamp creature. I don't think he's liberal by any stretch. He's just paraded around on the MSM since he is "anti - Trump".


  • Hifi Hifi 4 days ago

    Next week, I'll take delivery of my third Tesla. Best, most enjoyable, least problematic vehicles I've ever owned. By far. Not souring one bit. But OMFG... I do with EM would STFU though.

  • Inside Looking Out Why EBFlex dominates this EV discussion? Just because he is a Ford expert?
  • Marky S. Very nice article and photos. I am a HUGE Edsel fan. I have always been fascinated with the "Charlie Brown of Cars." Allow me to make a minor correction to add here: the Pacer line was the second-from-bottom rung Edsel, not the entry-level trim. That would be the Edsel Ranger for 1958. It had the widest array of body styles. The Ranger 2-door sedan (with a "B-pillar", not a pillarless hardtop), was priced at $2,484. So, the Ranger and Pacer both used the smaller Ford body. The next two upscale Edsel's were based on the Mercury body, are were: Corsair, and, top-line Citation. Although the 1959 style is my fav. I would love a '58 Edsel Pacer 4-door hardtop sedan!
  • Lou_BC Stupid to kill the 6ft box in the crewcab. That's the most common Canyon/Colorado trim I see. That kills the utility of a small truck. The extended cab was a poor seller so that makes sense. GM should have kept the diesel. It's a decent engine that mates well with the 6 speed. Fuel economy is impressive.
  • Lou_BC High end EV's are selling well. Car companies are taking advantage of that fact. I see quite a few $100k pickups in my travels so why is that ok but $100k EV's are bad? The cynical side of me sees car companies tack on 8k premiums to EV's around the time we see governments up EV credits. Coincidence? No fooking way.
  • EBFlex "I'd add to that right now, demand is higher than supply, so basic business rules say to raise the price."Demand is very low. Supply is even lower. Saying that demand is outstripping supply without providing context is dishonest at best.
Next