Report: Tariffs Could Lead To Halt In Auto Production
Automotive intelligence firm S&P Global Mobility is predicting that if President Donald Trump's proposed tariffs lead to a trade war, there's a 50 percent chance that the auto industry could enter a long period of disruption.
According to The Detroit Free Press, the firm has put out three possible scenarios that could play out, depending on how the trade wars go. In one, production could drop by 20,000 vehicles per day just a week from yesterday.
From S&P via Freep:
"Although some contend that tariffs on the auto industry may boost U.S. manufacturing, only GM, Ford and Stellantis have excess capacity to increase U.S. production, and automakers are not likely to be able to make such a change quickly or cost-effectively," S&P Global's report said. "A production shift would also require suppliers to relocate."
S&P says that the chance of a quick resolution to the tariff issues is only 30 percent.
S&P further points out that the auto industry doesn't like to invest without long-term stability. Tariffs aren't the only thing causing uncertainty that could delay investment and the development of future vehicles -- there is also confusion over what may happen with fuel economy and emissions regulations.
Again from S&P via the Freep:
"With tariffs now imposed on Canada and Mexico, we expect significant disruption in the region. S&P Global Mobility sees potential for North American production to drop by up 20,000 units per day within a week," the report stated. "We now expect that the tariff posture, messaging and coverage through 2025 will be erratic, placing (automakers) and suppliers’ mid- or long-term vehicle and facility planning in a virtual gridlock."
For now, Trump has enacted 20 percent tariffs on China and put 25 percent tariffs on Canadian and Mexican products, but exempted automakers that are part of the USMCA until April 2. He's also put 25 percent tariffs on steel and aluminum coming in from all countries. Canada and the European Union have hit back with tariffs on American goods -- the EU, for example, is tariffing motorcycles.
China has retaliated, too, with tariffs on chicken, beef, pork, soybeans, fruit, wheat, and corn.
For a vehicle to be USMCA compliant, it must have 75 percent of its content sourced from Canada, Mexico, or the U.S. Additionally, 40 percent of core parts and 70 percent of steel and aluminum must be sourced from the region, and wage requirements also must be met.
Given the complexity of supply chains, it's hard to say exactly which cars are compliant. S&P says Canadian-built vehicles with engines and transmissions sourced from USMCA countries are the most likely to comply. That means Stellantis, General Motors, and Toyota are the most likely to comply. Honda imports some of its transmissions, and Ford also might not be compliant. S&P says Nissan likely is, as is Mazda, despite importing some transmissions. Hyundai/Kia are likely to be compliant, but it's harder to tell with Volkswagen. BMW and Mercedes-Benz are unlikely to be compliant because they source engines and transmissions from Europe.
S&P's three scenarios are this: quick resolution, extended disruption, and tariff winter. That last one means tariffs would continue for a long time and cars would cost more, either because of the tariffs or because automakers would shift some production back to the U.S. and incur higher labor costs. The costs of tariffs or more-expensive labor would be passed on to the consumer. In this last scenario, sales would tumble about 10 percent in the U.S.
S&P does expect some production to shift back to the U.S., either because of the tariffs or because an automaker had already decided to build a certain model in the States but had yet to announce it. Still, it would take time to shift production and sales would likely drop before that can happen.
[Image: Gorodenkoff/Shutterstock.com]
Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.
Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.
More by Tim Healey
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- 28-Cars-Later “1. The Industrial Revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race. They have greatly increased the life-expectancy of those of us who live in “advanced” countries, but they have destabilized society, have made life unfulfilling, have subjected human beings to indignities, have led to widespread psychological suffering (in the Third World to physical suffering as well) and have inflicted severe damage on the natural world. The continued development of technology will worsen the situation. It will certainly subject human beings to greater indignities and inflict greater damage on the natural world, it will probably lead to greater social disruption and psychological suffering, and it may lead to increased physical suffering even in “advanced” countries....It would be better to dump the whole stinking system and take the consequences”― Theodore J. Kaczynski, Ph.D., Industrial Society and Its Future, 1995.
- FreedMike "Automotive connectivity has clearly been a net negative for the end user..."Really? Here's a list of all the net negatives for me:1) Instead of lugging around a road atlas or smaller maps that do nothing but distract me from driving, and don't tell me where to go once I've reached Point B, I can now just ask my car's navigation system to navigate me there. It'll even tell me how long it will take given current traffic conditions. 2) Instead of lugging around a box of a dozen or so cassette tapes that do nothing but distract me from driving, I can now just punch up a virtually endless library of music, podcasts, or audiobooks on the screen, push a button, and play them. 3) I can tell my car, "call (insert name here)" and the call is made without taking my hands off the wheel.4) I can tell my car, "text (insert name here)" and the system takes my dictation, sends me the text, and reads off any replies. 5) I can order up food on my screen, show up at the restaurant, and they'll have it waiting for me. 6) I can pull up a weather map that allows me to see things like hailstorms in my path. 7) If I'm in trouble, I can push a "SOS" button and help will be sent. 8) Using my phone, I can locate my car on a map and navigate to it on foot, and tell it to turn on the heat, A/C, or defrosters.None of these are benefits? Sorry, not sorry...I like them all. Why wouldn't I? Consumers clearly also like this stuff, and if they didn't, none of it would be included in cars. Now, maybe Matt doesn't find these to be beneficial. Fair enough! But he should not declare these things as a "net negative" for the rest of us. That's presumption. So...given all that, what's the answer here? Matt seems to think the answer is to "unplug" and go back to paper maps, boxes of music, and all that. Again, if that's Matt's bag, then fair enough. I mean, I've been there, and honestly, I don't want to go back, but if that's his bag, then go with God, I guess. But this isn't the solution for everyone, and saying otherwise is presumption. Here's a solution that DOES work for everyone: instead of throwing the baby out with the bathwater, clean the bathwater. You do that very, very simply: require clear, easy-to-understand disclosure of data sharing that happens as the result of all these connected services, and an equally clear, easy-to-understand method for opting out of said data sharing. That works better than turning the clock back to those thrilling days of 1990 when you had to refer to handwritten notes to get you to your date's house, or ripping SIM cards out of your car.
- Funky D What is the over-under for number of recalls in the first 5 years of ownership?
- Normie Dayyum! Great White Woman!The car, I mean. I could feel kinda safe in it.
- Slavuta "The telescreen received and transmitted simultaneously. Any sound that Winston made, above the level of a very low whisper, would be picked up by it; moreover, so long as he remained within the field of vision which the metal plaque commanded, he could be seen as well as heard. There was of course no way of knowing whether you were being watched at any given moment. " --- 1984
Comments
Join the conversation
I set out one egg this morning instead of two (economists call this the 'substitution effect' but I wouldn't know about that, just look at the region I am from). But then I went and fired up the truck and did some work with a shovel and a broom, no breakfast yet. My grandparents lived through the Great Depression, I think I probably have it worse than them now. I am basically at Valley Forge levels of hardship, maybe. Can we bring back FDR?
(I would do some all caps or bold or underlining but I am so very tired.)
Lots of good land in Alabama for more auto factories! I’m all for tariffs moving manufacturing back to the US.
the fact an EV startup (relatively speaking) makes autos in USA for USA successfully and the legacy 3 can’t says there’s a problem with the failing brands - perhaps the decision to layoff here and hire there wasn’t so wise.