Audi to Rename Entire Vehicle Lineup

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

If you thought Audi’s naming scheme for electric vehicles was a little confusing, buckle up because things are about to get more complicated. The brand is preparing to rename its entire lineup to further differentiate between EVs and combustion models. While rumors about the company dumping e-tron badging for something different have circulated for weeks, CEO Markus Duesmann recently confirmed some of the details in Germany. In the future, all combustion-reliant Audi products will be issued odd numbers while electric models are to be given even ones.


Speaking with the German magazine Auto Bild, Duesmann confirmed that the next-generation A4 will be sold as an A5 and that the A6 will become the A7. However, things just get more confusing from there. The A4 will also be sticking around as an all-electric model and won’t require a name change, with something similar taking place for a prospective all-electric A6. Corporate leadership likewise noted that the “e-tron” badge will probably not be going away.


"In the future it will be like this: the odd numbers will be the combustion engines and the even numbers will stand for the battery-electric vehicles,” he explained in German.


"At Audi, e-tron stands for 100 [percent] electric and is a well-established term," added Chief Technology Officer Oliver Hoffmann. "We want to stick to that."


But that makes one wonder why the hell Audi is doing any of this to begin with and begs the question of what’s going to happen to preexisting combustion models (like the current A5 and A7) that are being bumped out of position by the automaker having to round up models with even-numbered names.


Duesmann reportedly didn’t have much to offer, saying details about additional variants would be addressed further down the line. But he reassured the outlet that customers could “look forward to many emotional and high-performance derivatives,” indicating that the S and RS-badged vehicles should persist.


While the rest of the year should be pretty tepid in terms of Audi announcements – the company is mostly doing facelifts until the Q6 e-tron arrives – next year is probably when we’ll start seeing this new naming scheme come into effect. The brand has over a dozen vehicle launches scheduled for both 2024 and 2025. Most of those will be entirely new products, even if they keep the old names.


That said, Duesmann wanted to make it crystal clear that the company intends to continue building combustion models until the European Union’s planned registration ban for new gasoline and diesel-powered vehicles comes into effect in 2035. It’s a bit strange, considering Volkswagen Group’s previous insistence that Audi would be leading the charge with EVs. However, based on the progression of electric vehicle sales, it’s probably wise for Audi to keep combustion cars in the mix until it’s not legally allowed to sell them.


[Image: ANAID studio/Shutterstock]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 34 comments
  • Paul Paul on Mar 21, 2023

    MBAs gonna MBA.

    • Stuki Moi Stuki Moi on Mar 21, 2023

      Post 2008, even in Germany; once the last remaining vestige of literacy in The West. China to the rescue, I suppose.....




  • Jonathan Jonathan on Mar 21, 2023

    The Germans. So organized they can appear disorganized. I agree with some others, classic names like Thunderbird, Imperial, Grand Prix, Ambassador etc. just have more appeal.


    • See 1 previous
    • Analoggrotto Analoggrotto on Jun 27, 2023

      You just sunk his battleship!


      Using a list of defunct detroit rubbish didn't help one bit there.





  • Redapple2 jeffbut they dont want to ... their pick up is 4th behind ford/ram, Toyota. GM has the Best engineers in the world. More truck profit than the other 3. Silverado + Sierra+ Tahoe + Yukon sales = 2x ford total @ $15,000 profit per. Tons o $ to invest in the BEST truck. No. They make crap. Garbage. Evil gm Vampire
  • Rishabh Ive actually seen the one unit you mentioned, driving around in gurugram once. And thats why i got curious to know more about how many they sold. Seems like i saw the only one!
  • Amy I owned this exact car from 16 until 19 (1990 to 1993) I miss this car immensely and am on the search to own it again, although it looks like my search may be in vane. It was affectionatly dubbed, " The Dragon Wagon," and hauled many a teenager around the city of Charlotte, NC. For me, it was dependable and trustworthy. I was able to do much of the maintenance myself until I was struck by lightning and a month later the battery exploded. My parents did have the entire electrical system redone and he was back to new. I hope to find one in the near future and make it my every day driver. I'm a dreamer.
  • Jeff Overall I prefer the 59 GM cars to the 58s because of less chrome but I have a new appreciation of the 58 Cadillac Eldorados after reading this series. I use to not like the 58 Eldorados but I now don't mind them. Overall I prefer the 55-57s GMs over most of the 58-60s GMs. For the most part I like the 61 GMs. Chryslers I like the 57 and 58s. Fords I liked the 55 thru 57s but the 58s and 59s not as much with the exception of Mercury which I for the most part like all those. As the 60s progressed the tail fins started to go away and the amount of chrome was reduced. More understated.
  • Theflyersfan Nissan could have the best auto lineup of any carmaker (they don't), but until they improve one major issue, the best cars out there won't matter. That is the dealership experience. Year after year in multiple customer service surveys from groups like JD Power and CR, Nissan frequency scrapes the bottom. Personally, I really like the never seen new Z, but after having several truly awful Nissan dealer experiences, my shadow will never darken a Nissan showroom. I'm painting with broad strokes here, but maybe it is so ingrained in their culture to try to take advantage of people who might not be savvy enough in the buying experience that they by default treat everyone like idiots and saps. All of this has to be frustrating to Nissan HQ as they are improving their lineup but their dealers drag them down.
Next