Return of the Apple Car: Almost There or Vaporware?

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky
return of the apple car almost there or vaporware

After years of restarting and then killing its electric vehicle program, Apple has again signaled that it’s once again serious about developing something for your driveway. Ulrich Kranz, former Canoo CEO and brains behind the BMW i-cars, has reportedly been picked up by the company for its automotive team.

Apple has yet to verify the hire and Kranz hasn’t updated his LinkedIn profile. But there have been multiple reports that he’s been been taken aboard specifically for his EV expertise. Unless social networking platforms are becoming passé (fingers crossed), it’s likely that the tech company wanted to wait until it could make an official announcement accompanied by an update on development.

That’s assuming Apple is still doing a car, however.

One of my first articles for this website was about how the company had laid off a sizable percentage of the staff devoted to its vehicle program (known as Project Titan) in 2016. Since then, there has been boom and bust periods with employees taking the revolving-door approach. It was more-or-less the same situation other firms trying to build a self-driving automobile found themselves in.

For a time, Apple suggested it was focusing solely on hardware and software it would be selling to manufacturers. But it eventually became clear that the business was indeed attempting to build a consumer product with autonomous capabilities that could be integrated with iOS. It also began asking for autonomous testing permits from California’s Department of Motor Vehicles. During this time we learned it was already installing hardware on Lexus SUVs (for road testing) and Volkswagen T6 vans (for an employee shuttle service).

By 2018, everyone had begun suggesting that the company was back on track for building its own car. Another swath of layoffs hit the firm the following year, with many employees on the AV program being moved to other departments. Some have argued this coincided with the return of engineer Doug Field, who was back from Tesla for the second time. It also acquired the autonomous vehicle startup known as Drive.ai. Employees were then funneled slowly back into the program with new, high-profile hires coming in from outside the company — many of whom had years of expertise in vehicle development.

Fast forwarding to 2021, we’ve seen Apple commence and then abandon talks with Hyundai Motor Group to build an automobile. This was proceeded by news that LG Magna e-Powertrain could be helping to deliver Apple Cars in limited quantities and that the tech giant was actually still in talks with Korean automakers.

When April came, we didn’t really know what to think. Apple had said it was going to make a big announcement about the project in the coming months and then immediately lost several top managers. Speculation ran rampant with media suggesting the firm was going to pivot toward a Waymo-like taxi service or simply return to its original idea of selling AV software. But now we know it has started discussions with Chinese battery suppliers (CATL and BYD) and just hired Ulrich Kranz.

If the last few years has taught me anything, it’s that corporations are excellent at keeping your expectations high while they perpetually shift the goalpost. Like all autonomous programs, targets for the Apple Car have been constantly revised and progress on the vehicle has been obfuscated to a degree that almost makes it impossible to discuss seriously. The data we currently have points to the business preparing for another offensive. But there have been at least two of those already and neither resulted in anything tangible. The ghost of Steve Jobs never appeared at trade shows piloting an Apple-branded prototype and there have been no teaser clips of a silhouetted vehicle reminding us to stay tuned for any presumed products. Unless you count the Lexus test beds affixed with sensor arrays, we’ve seen neither hide nor hair of anything that would even approximate there being an “Apple Car.”

And yet there’s all this circumstantial evidence that the firm is clearly trying to develop an automobile.

In 2015, Apple stated that it would have something for us by 2019. That date predictably came and went, mimicking the trajectory of every other brand attempting to build something that could drive itself, and the tech giant has only gotten more secretive about its overall progress. New estimates place Apple delivering something in 2024, or perhaps later. But it’s become difficult to understand why we should believe in that timeline when we’ve seen precious little in the way of progress. At least all of those engineers and programmers are earning a paycheck until there’s another round of layoffs.

[Image: withGod/Shutterstock; Sundry Photography/Shutterstock]

Comments
Join the conversation
6 of 10 comments
  • SCE to AUX SCE to AUX on Jun 11, 2021

    Apple won't be building a car. Even *they* couldn't conjure up a battery plant, or the factory, or the personnel, or the required support structure to do it for many years. If Tesla has taught us anything, it's that building cars is hard. Besides, their whimsical commitment to cars and AV tech puts them next to Faraday Future in my mind. Maybe, maybe they'll sell some tech to somebody, but that's about it.

    • See 3 previous
    • Thegamper Thegamper on Jun 14, 2021

      @Art Vandelay If Apple had a viable product, it wouldnt even have to really be that good, people would buy it. I could totally see Apple being interested in producing vehicles. The parts, the service, the charging, all create dollars. Apple would likely control all aspects of the vehicle, telling how fast you want to go, what music you can listen to and from what provider, what phone you can pair to your vehicle, etc. If history is any indication though, Apple is likely looking for a partner to help them get into the game, produce viable products until Apple can create their own supply base and manufacturing capabilities and then do it all themselves.....because why pay others when every dollar of profit can be made in house. So Apple would likely squeeze their suppliers, because they should be honored to supply components to Apple at any price and then just develop their own components (even if they arent as good) to sell to consumers at additional markup. Just saying, partnerships with Apple havent gone well for others, i.e. Intel, Qualcomm. Then Apple will patent the wheel claiming they invented it and charge everyone else royalties... You get the idea.

  • Thornmark Thornmark on Jun 13, 2021

    a Microsoft car would be an assault vehicle

  • Jim Bonham Full EVs are not for everyone, they cannot meet all needs. Hybrids do a much better job of providing the benefits of EVs without most of the drawbacks. I have a hybrid sedan with plenty of room, plus all the bells and whistles. It has 360 hp, AWD, does 0-60 in just over 5 sec.(the instant torque is a real benefit), and I get 29 mpg, average. NOT driven lightly. I bought it used for $25k.Sure, it's a little heavier because of the battery, motor, etc., but not nearly as much as a full EV. The battery is smaller/lighter/cheaper and both the alternator and starter motor are eliminated since the motor assumes those functions. It's cool to watch the charge guage show I'm getting energy back when coasting and/or braking. It's even cooler to drive around part of the time on battery only. It really comes in handy in traffic since the engine turns off and you don't waste fuel idling. With the adaptive cruise control you just let the car slowly inch along by itself.I only wish it were a Plug-in Hybrid (PHEV). Then, I'd have A LOT more EV-only range, along with even more of that instant torque. The battery would be bigger, but still a fraction of the size of a full EV. I could easily go weeks without using much, if any gas (depending upon my commute) IF I plug it in every night. But I don't have to. The gas engine will charge the battery whenever it's needed.It's just not as efficient a way to do it.Electric companies offer special rates for both EVs and PHEVs which lower your operating cost compared to gasoline. They'll even give you a rebate to offset the cost of installing a home charger. You can still get federal (up to $7,500, plus some state) tax credits for PHEVs.What's not to like? My next daily driver will be a PHEV of some kind. Probably a performance-oriented one like the new Dodge Hornet or one of the German Hybrid SUVs. All the benefits, sound, feel, etc., of a gas vehicle along with some electric assist to improve fuel economy, performance, and drivability. None of the inherent EV issues of cost, range anxiety, long charging times, poor charger availability, grid capacity issues, etc. I think most people will eventually catch on to this and go PHEV instead of going full EV. Synthetic, carbon-neutral eFuels, hydrogen engines, and other things will also prevent full EVs from being 100% of the fleet, regardless of what the politicians say. PHEVs can be as "clean" (overall) as full EVs with the right fuels. They're also cheaper, and far more practical, for most people. They can do it all, EVs can't.
  • Ron rufo there is in WaSHINGTON STATE
  • ToolGuy @Chris, your photography rocks.
  • ToolGuy No War for Oli.If you have not ever held a piece of structural honeycomb (composite sandwich) in your own hands, try it.
  • ToolGuy You make them sound like criminals.
Next