Apple ICar: The Next Big Thing?

Jason R. Sakurai
by Jason R. Sakurai

Apple has targeted 2024 to produce a passenger vehicle that could include proprietary self-driving and battery technologies, according to Reuters.

Project Titan, The iPad creator’s automotive effort, started in 2014 with the goal of Apple designing its own vehicle. Apple later scaled back the effort to shift its focus elsewhere. Doug Field, an Apple veteran who had worked for Tesla, returned in 2018 to oversee the project, and in 2019 laid off 190 team members.

Apple has advanced to the point where it aims to build a vehicle for consumers, persons familiar with the effort said, requesting anonymity because Apple’s plans have not been made public. Apple’s creation of mass-market personal vehicles contrasts with rivals such as Alphabet’s Waymo, which built robo-taxis for a driverless ride-hailing service.

Apple’s strategy may include a new battery design that could drastically reduce their cost and increase the vehicle’s range, according to a person who has seen the designs. Apple declined to comment on its plans or future products and did not return calls to their media contacts.

Manufacturing a vehicle represents a challenge even for a company with ample resources that makes hundreds of millions of products each year with parts from around the world. In comparison, it took Tesla 17 years before it achieved profitability as a car maker. It is unclear who might manufacture and assemble an Apple car, but sources have said the company would rely on a manufacturing partner to build vehicles. Apple may decide to reduce the scope of this effort to an autonomous driving system, integrated into a car made by an existing automaker, rather than the maker of iPhones constructing an iCar from the ground up.

Pandemic-related delays could push the start of production into 2025 or beyond, persons with knowledge of Apple’s plans warned. Apple shares ended 1.24 percent higher after the news circulated on Monday, with Tesla shares ending 6.5 percent lower.

Outside partners may be required for elements including lidar sensors, necessary for self-driving cars to get a three-dimensional view of the road. An Apple car may need multiple sensors to scan different distances. These could be taken from internally-developed lidar sensors, such as those found in Apple’s iPhone 12 Pro and iPad Pro models, both released this year. Apple has reportedly held talks with potential suppliers, but it was also examining using its own sensors.

Apple plans to use a monocell battery design that bulks up individual cells, creating space inside the battery by eliminating pouches and modules that hold battery materials. More active material inside the battery could give the car a longer range. Apple is also contemplating using lithium iron phosphate chemistry, or LFP, which is less likely to overheat and is safer than other types of lithium-ion batteries.

Apple had discussions about manufacturing the car with Magna International, but these talks fizzled out as Apple’s plans became unclear. Automotive contract manufacturers require volumes that could pose a challenge to any newbie in the automotive market, Apple included.

“In order to have a viable assembly plant, you need 100,000 vehicles annually, with more volume to come,” the person said.

Apple investors reacted to the report on the company’s plans with care. Trip Miller, managing partner at Apple investor Gullane Capital Partners, said, “It would seem to me that if Apple develops an advanced operating system or battery technology, it would be best utilized with an existing manufacturer under license. As we saw with Tesla and the legacy auto companies, establishing a complex manufacturing network around the globe doesn’t happen overnight.”

Hal Eddins, chief economist at Apple shareholder Capital Investment Counsel, noted Apple has a history of higher margins than most automakers. “My initial reaction as a shareholder is that I don’t see the appeal of the car business, but Apple may be eyeing another angle,” Eddins said.

Apple started a revolution in personal technology when it rolled out the Macintosh computer in 1984. Arguably the innovation leader with the iPhone, iPad, Mac, Apple Watch, and Apple TV, Apple’s software operates across all of their devices, and services. My content has been created on Macs since the Classic was first introduced.

[Images: Apple]

Jason R. Sakurai
Jason R. Sakurai

With a father who owned a dealership, I literally grew up in the business. After college, I worked for GM, Nissan and Mazda, writing articles for automotive enthusiast magazines as a side gig. I discovered you could make a living selling ad space at Four Wheeler magazine, before I moved on to selling TV for the National Hot Rod Association. After that, I started Roadhouse, a marketing, advertising and PR firm dedicated to the automotive, outdoor/apparel, and entertainment industries. Through the years, I continued writing, shooting, and editing. It keep things interesting.

More by Jason R. Sakurai

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 37 comments
  • Lorenzo Lorenzo on Dec 24, 2020

    When the CEO of Toyota says EVs are overblown, and echoes Musk that there isn't enough electrical generation capacity, it's too late for Apple to dive into a high capital/low margin industry that's still better at mass assembly than Tesla.

  • Blppt Blppt on Dec 24, 2020

    Wow, I thought for a second you had made a typo---they seriously put the 1.4T in the wagon? Do they do the same for AWD? From what I've read, the 1.8T was mostly just "adequate", so I can't imagine the 1.4 is too enjoyable to drive.

  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh A prelude is a bad idea. There is already Acura with all the weird sport trims. This will not make back it's R&D money.
  • Analoggrotto I don't see a red car here, how blazing stupid are you people?
  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
Next