CarMax Acquires Edmunds in $400 Million Deal

by Corey Lewis

Published: April 2nd, 2021

carmax acquires edmunds in 400 million deal

Yesterday, used-car giant CarMax announced it finalized a deal to acquire automotive consumer advice site Edmunds, in a deal worth just over $400 million.

CarMax promises it’s magnanimous, and that Edmunds and its advice will operate independently of CarMax and its sales.

CarMax first showed interest in Edmunds in January of 2020, when it handed over $50 million to acquire a minority ownership stake. Once the check cleared, CarMax and Edmunds worked jointly on a number of new projects, which included the successful instant offer tool on Edmunds. That’s the button sellers use to sell their car to CarMax for Cash Right Now. CarMax credits that instant offer button with placing CarMax in place to become the largest online buyer of used cars from consumers.

They’re so pleased with collaborations thus far that CarMax is shelling out the remaining $354 million to purchase the 50-year-old Edmunds. The purchase will take place via stock buyout and cash. CarMax says they’re excited to invest in Edmunds’ growth and look forward to delivering the highest quality online experience possible. Edmunds says CarMax is a great business partner, and the company looks to provide continual innovation, as well as support their dealer and manufacturer customers.

And don’t worry about the providers of advice and the sellers of the product that’s being advised upon residing under the same ownership umbrella. CarMax ensures that Edmunds will operate independently, and will remain in its consumer-focused advisory capacity, as well as continuing to offer value to the aforementioned dealers and manufacturers. Advice articles like this one that encourage you to use the instant offer button to sell your car directly to CarMax are just a coincidence.

[Image: CarMax]

#CarMax #Edmunds #Industry #NewsBlog #UsedCars

Corey Lewis

Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.

More by Corey Lewis

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 23 comments

Schmitt trigger on Apr 03, 2021

Thanks Shappy, for corroborating our suspicions.

Like Reply
EX35 on Apr 04, 2021

I’ve said it before but just put TTAC out of its misery already. It’s a case study in what happens when you sell out. I also can’t imagine it makes any money. Who even comes here to read reviews of MY2020 cars.

Like Reply

Recent Comments

Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh A prelude is a bad idea. There is already Acura with all the weird sport trims. This will not make back it's R&D money.
Analoggrotto I don't see a red car here, how blazing stupid are you people?
Redapple2 Love the wheels
Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.