By on July 29, 2020

Toyota announced the creation of a new holding company that will oversee its software development initiatives this week. While our default response is to gripe about the nebulous concept of “mobility companies” and the industry’s obnoxious emphasis on shifting data, we also understand that it pays to have someone on hand who knows their way around a line of code.

It wasn’t all that long go that Volkswagen was bragging about taking software seriously, only to be publicly shamed by the media when bunk programming screwed up the launch of numerous physical products. The cynical side of the brain knows this could have been avoided by ignoring unnecessary connectivity features and a potentially ill-conceived attempt to digitize the entire cabin.

We’re sympathetic to the nature of competition and the appeal “newness” has on customers. The automotive industry has seen the sea of riches amassed by tech companies harvesting data and knows which way the wind is blowing. No brand wants to be seen as technologically inferior, even if many of the newer features in modern cars aren’t really in service of anything other than marketing. Yet the “software first” mentality that has started presiding over vehicle development seems somewhat counterproductive, and Toyota may have just bought into it hook, line and sinker.

Then again, maybe it’s a great play and we’re just not seeing the big picture. So let’s dive in and see what we find.

Toyota Research Institute  Advanced Development, Inc. (TRI-AD) announced Tuesday that it will expand into a holding company divided into two operating companies. Effective January of 2021, a new entity called Woven Planet Holdings will split into Woven Core  focused on developing automated driving  and Woven Alpha  which will revolve around vehicular connectivity, navigation, and in-car applications. Likely to be the bigger money maker, at least in the short term, Alpha will also serve as the place where Toyota can test and build upon new concepts that might open the door to new sources of revenue.

It’s also tasked with handling Woven City, Toyota’s concept town that merges basically every green/connected idea you’ve ever heard of at the base of Mount Fuji. That includes “mobility as a service” in lieu of traditional vehicle ownership, smart-home devices connected to the local infrastructure, artificial intelligence wherever possible, and sustainability projects using hydrogen power.

TRI-AD CEO James Kuffner will continue leading all three companies from the institute’s home office in Tokyo. He was added to Toyota’s management board last month to showcase how serious the brand was about breaking new technological ground and evolving the company. Kuffner spoke with Automotive News in June to explain TRI-AD’s growing role at Toyota and how important software would be moving ahead.

From AN:

“Toyota has a long history of building an excellent, reliable products and hardware, but building software is something that is a new capability for many traditional automakers,” Kuffner said.

“My mission is really to create a strong software center of excellence within the Toyota group at Toyota Research Institute  Advanced Development and, working with our other partners, and create products that have both good hardware and good software together,” he said. Toyota said one goal is to create a more agile “software-first” development process for cars.

Toyota’s push to strengthen its software firepower comes as rivals make similar moves in an attempt to streamline the complicated computer systems that run their cars and have them interact more seamlessly with the vehicles’ mechanical and electronic architectures.

Volkswagen Group, for instance, said all its new models will run on a new vw.os operating system by 2025 and last year unified its fragmented information technology units into a $8 billion subsidiary called Car.Software that is tasked with developing such computer systems in-house.

We could consider some of the issues VW now faces as growing pains and hope that Toyota doesn’t find itself in a similar boat, despite intentionally walking a very familiar path. Officially, Woven is basically a rejiggering of TRI-AD with more room for investors to climb aboard various projects as they emerge. However, its overall goal remains the same  build up Toyota’s software in order to influence future hardware.

“Reorganized under the name ‘Woven,’ TRI-AD will endeavor to become the type of organization that will allow those involved to step on the accelerator in helping realize a future where people can be more happy,” Akio Toyoda, president of Toyota Motor Corporation, explained in a statement. “To make it more open and collaborative, the one thing that will purposefully be missing from these 3 new companies, Woven Planet, Woven CORE, and Woven Alpha is the ‘Toyota’ branding.”

“Regardless, these companies will clear the path for the future of Toyota, as they carry on the legacy of ‘for the happiness of others’ that Toyota has so carefully woven into its own DNA,” he concluded.

Among some of the projects outsiders can glom onto is Arene  a new automotive operating system that will allow for “programmable cars” Toyota would like to see shared throughout the industry. It’s supposed to be easily adaptable for various automotive applications, launch synced to its own cloud, and capable of frequent updates that will (hopefully) stop it from becoming stodgy and dated as the years roll on. It’s basically trying to become the macOS or Windows 10 of automotive software, but it’s still in its infancy — and this will have to be embraced by the industry at large for Toyota to achieve its ultimate goal.

[Image: Toyota]

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

11 Comments on “Toyota Is Becoming a Software Company...”

  • avatar

    One look at that grill and it becomes brutally obvious why Tesla is kicking everyone else’s butt. Was the designer drunk when he sketched it?

    • 0 avatar
      Art Vandelay

      I don’t get it. Toyota sold like 100,000 more Corollas alone than Tesla sold cars in the US last year 304,850 vs 192,250. That is total cars in the US for Tesla vs. one model in one market that isn’t even the top selling model in the market for Toyota. Toyota sold over 10 million vehicles globally last year to roughly 370,000 total sales for Tesla. Toyota made 19 Billion in profit in 2019. Tesla lost 862 Million dollars in 2019.

      You can love Tesla, You can love Toyota or you can hate them both, but Tesla is not kicking Toyota’s butt and anything.

      • 0 avatar

        Tesla makes luxury cars. You have to compare it with Lexus not Toyota.

        • 0 avatar
          Art Vandelay

          OK, OP wasn’t talking about Lexus but still, Lexus sold 765,000 vehicles last year. Profit or loss (I’d assume.profit since the big sellers are based on Toyota platforms that are generating profit) is rolled into that Toyota number.

          I’d give you the S and the X, but the lower trimmed 3 and Y are certainly on the same planet as loaded models from the main manufacturers. 40-45k isn’t luxury territory…that’s middle of the road pickup truck territory.

          • 0 avatar

            Yeah a Model3 with spartan linoleum interior and one giant touchscreen — that’s looxury all right. Does
            Lexus make a car that ordinary inside? No matter what gets said about Tesla, someone will come up with an excuse to compare apples with kiwi fruit to avoid meeting the obvious head on.

          • 0 avatar

            Model 3 is the best selling car in California. People who are buying them are cross shopping them with other luxury cars.

          • 0 avatar

            @Inside Looking Out, part of the reason that the 3 is the best selling sedan in CA is the free car pool access. For some people that means they get an extra hour or more of time per day. The state incentives haven’t hurt either.

    • 0 avatar


      For a long time Toyota built reliable, relatively conservatively-styled vehicles. Automotive writers decried them as plain and unexciting. The more-aggressive grilles are a direct response to this criticism. Some customers (and potential customers) strongly dislike the new styling direction. The automotive journalists are still not completely satisfied… and the cycle continues.

      [This is how the sedan was killed.]

  • avatar
    Matt Foley

    When I buy a Toyota, I don’t want “mobility as a service” in lieu of traditional vehicle ownership, smart-home devices connected to the local infrastructure, or artificial intelligence. I just want a well-engineered, well-constructed, driver-friendly car that will last 250,000 miles or more when well maintained.

    Is my wife’s 2015 Venza the last traditional Toyota? Bulletproof 4-cyl engine without forced induction or direct injection, conventional automatic transmission, starts with a key, no electronic fappery, requires no software updates or monthly fee-based service of any kind. Quiet, safe, comfortable, boring. She loves it. Oh, what a feeling.

  • avatar
    Art Vandelay

    Given the era that their infotainment suites seem to be stuck in, will they be focusing on Windows XP as a platform?

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • Steve: Borla.
  • Funky D: “Ford says it’s all part of the Ford+ plan, a strategy described by the company as an effort to...
  • TDIGuy: Demand should be driven by consumers, not business or politics. Business should do what it can to create...
  • Mike Beranek: That two-tone Ramcharger in the ad looks better than ANY modern large SUV. Love the stacked lights and...
  • SaulTigh: Always dreamed of having a V12 as a kid. If you wanted smoothness and great power when I was young, a V12...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber