Honda Teases a Passport That's a Real Honda

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

The space between compact and midsize crossovers, automakers have discovered, is ripe for the creation of a wholly new segment. A tweener, essentially, that bridges the gap with two rows of seating but more cargo room, power, and (often) luxury than a compact can muster.

Ford learned this long ago with its Edge, and General Motors recently discovered it with the reborn 2019 Blazer. Nissan’s Murano stakes out the same ground, positioning itself as the slightly upscale alternative to the Rogue and Pathfinder. Then there’s the former Hyundai Santa Fe Sport, now just Santa Fe. Not to miss out on an opportunity for big crossover bucks, Honda’s preparing to enter the fray with a new iteration of the Passport.

Unlike the Passport that came before, there’s no Isuzu hiding beneath these clothes.

We learned about the model’s looming return last year, but full specs won’t be available until Nov. 27th, the day before its LA Auto Show debut. At least there’s something to look at now, as Honda teased some camo-free shots Thursday. Unmasked, maybe, but cloaked by distance and dust. The automaker provided a video, seemingly shot at 500 feet, of the vehicle carving a path up a dirt mountain road, never once providing a front or side angle.

What a tease.

The original Passport saw Honda take an Isuzu Rodeo and spend very little time turning it into a just-in-time SUV offering. Introduced for the 1994 model year, it survived through two generations until its demise in 2002. This model dispenses with yesterday’s badge engineering BS, however, preferring an in-house platform (a shortened version of the Pilot’s) to go with its five-seat cabin.

Honda doesn’t give us much to go on, but it’s expected that the powertrain will also be a Pilot carryover. That means a 3.5-liter V6 making 280 horsepower and 262 lb-ft of torque mated to a six- or nine-speed automatic, though it wouldn’t be surprising to see Honda drop a turbocharged 2.0-liter in this rig, as well.

With sales of even well-regarded passenger cars dropping fast, adding a new, high-margin entry to the company’s light truck lineup would be a boon for Honda. Through October, total Honda brand car sales fell 9.8 percent, with a 14.8 percent year-over-year dip recorded last month. Meanwhile, light truck volume rose 5.3 percent, year to date.

The 2019 Honda Passport launches early next year.

[Images: Honda]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 12 comments
  • Nitramaj Nitramaj on Nov 16, 2018

    I love Honda, but they can’t seem to build enough Pilots, CR-Vs, and HR-Vs as it is. Where are they going come up with the production capacity for this?

    • NormSV650 NormSV650 on Nov 16, 2018

      We you know you love Honda, but no need to lie as they have 52,000 CR-V and HR-V sitting on dealership lots.

  • Eggsalad Eggsalad on Nov 16, 2018

    I had a 1980 Honda Passport. That's what they called the Super Cub in the US, because Piper Aircraft owned the "Super Cub" name in the US.

    • NormSV650 NormSV650 on Nov 16, 2018

      A buddy had one too. Major electrical problems and eventually they just sold it.

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next