Honda Teases New Accord: Updated Styling, Google Tech

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

On Tuesday, Honda teased the arrival of the 11th generation Accord – offering a series of darkened photos and just enough relevant information to whet one’s appetite.


The manufacturer is calling the updated model “sporty, modern, smart, and comfortable” while vowing it’ll have a sleek design that seems to be following in the footsteps of the new Civic and CR-V. That means understated but rather elegant bodywork that might not be as aggressive as its predecessor but is arguably more in sync with Honda’s historic styling decisions. Think less contemporary and more timeless. 


While largely obfuscated by shadows, Honda’s sedan now appears to have LED lighting that underscores how the vehicle has been sculpted. The chrome-free grille is also new and appears to have a triangular, or perhaps, diamond theme. On the opposite end of the vehicle, Honda has stretched the Accord’s tail lamps all the way across its width. But designers stopped short of making it a singular piece by adding a tastefully small Honda emblem smack-dab in the middle. 


The Honda Accord is one of those vehicles that everyone seems to appreciate – from the average commuter who cares nothing about cars to the enthusiast that obsesses over every inch of a vehicle. Granted, the Accord is no longer the brand’s mainstay since the CR-V became Honda’s top-selling product. But the sedan, along with the smaller Civic, still represents an important market for the Japanese automaker and is clearly a vehicle it takes real pride in building. 


Your author has long held the conspiracy theory that American automakers didn’t just abandon small, traditional automobiles to expand their per-vehicle profit margins. But also because they were being outclassed by the Japanese. There were certainly exceptions to the rule (e.g. Ford Fusion), however, U.S. brands seemed to realize that they were engaged in a losing battle with the Honda Accord and Toyota Camry in terms of mainstream appeal. Unless they were offering something truly unique, sticking with sedans was a losing proposition for American brands so they effectively handed it off to their non-domestic rivals. In exchange, U.S. companies focused on building crossovers, SUVs, and pickup trucks (a high-margin segment they absolutely dominate).

We can argue whether that puts more or less pressure on the Accord in the modern era, especially with sedan volumes trending down for roughly a decade. But that won’t change the fact that this remains an important vehicle for the Honda brand. As such, it’s getting an overall refresh that’s about more than just looks. The manufacturer wants to modernize the model by adding connectivity features and freshening its looks, without obliterating the characteristics that made it a winner in the first place. 


With that in mind, Honda has also cleverly shown the 12.3-inch infotainment display running Google apps. The company announced that it would be working with the tech firm in 2021 to deliver upgraded connectivity features (e.g. an in-car voice assistant, upgraded navigation, new applications) and appears to be baking that into the 11th-generation Accord. These aren’t necessarily going to be desirable inclusions for everyone with serious privacy concerns (Google, like Amazon, has a bad track record in terms of transparency). But they do offer useful features, especially upgraded navigation, that many less-scrutinizing consumers will appreciate. Truth be told, a lot of the proprietary systems being offered by automotive companies haven’t been all that good. So a lot of brands have begun establishing partnerships with big tech to give themselves a competitive edge. However, the Accord’s current infotainment system never felt all that lacking from this end. 


Honda hasn't released any official information about the sedan’s powertrains. Though it’s obvious to see (based on the teasers) that a hybrid option will be available. It’s also likely that the base Accord will still be internal combustion only, with the model likely to retain the current 192 horsepower, turbocharged 1.5-liter four-cylinder and perhaps the fancier 252 hp, 2.0-liter turbo that’s found in higher trims. While neither is bad, the latter option does make it more exciting to drive. We’d love to see it (even a de-tuned version) become the base powertrain, provided it doesn’t add a lot to the Accord’s price. 

[Images: Honda]


Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 47 comments
  • B-BodyBuick84 Not afraid of AV's as I highly doubt they will ever be %100 viable for our roads. Stop-and-go downtown city or rush hour highway traffic? I can see that, but otherwise there's simply too many variables. Bad weather conditions, faded road lines or markings, reflective surfaces with glare, etc. There's also the issue of cultural norms. About a decade ago there was actually an online test called 'The Morality Machine' one could do online where you were in control of an AV and choose what action to take when a crash was inevitable. I think something like 2.5 million people across the world participated? For example, do you hit and most likely kill the elderly couple strolling across the crosswalk or crash the vehicle into a cement barrier and almost certainly cause the death of the vehicle occupants? What if it's a parent and child? In N. America 98% of people choose to hit the elderly couple and save themselves while in Asia, the exact opposite happened where 98% choose to hit the parent and child. Why? Cultural differences. Asia puts a lot of emphasis on respecting their elderly while N. America has a culture of 'save/ protect the children'. Are these AV's going to respect that culture? Is a VW Jetta or Buick Envision AV going to have different programming depending on whether it's sold in Canada or Taiwan? how's that going to effect legislation and legal battles when a crash inevitibly does happen? These are the true barriers to mass AV adoption, and in the 10 years since that test came out, there has been zero answers or progress on this matter. So no, I'm not afraid of AV's simply because with the exception of a few specific situations, most avenues are going to prove to be a dead-end for automakers.
  • Mike Bradley Autonomous cars were developed in Silicon Valley. For new products there, the standard business plan is to put a barely-functioning product on the market right away and wait for the early-adopter customers to find the flaws. That's exactly what's happened. Detroit's plan is pretty much the opposite, but Detroit isn't developing this product. That's why dealers, for instance, haven't been trained in the cars.
  • Dartman https://apnews.com/article/artificial-intelligence-fighter-jets-air-force-6a1100c96a73ca9b7f41cbd6a2753fdaAutonomous/Ai is here now. The question is implementation and acceptance.
  • FreedMike If Dodge were smart - and I don't think they are - they'd spend their money refreshing and reworking the Durango (which I think is entering model year 3,221), versus going down the same "stuff 'em full of motor and give 'em cool new paint options" path. That's the approach they used with the Charger and Challenger, and both those models are dead. The Durango is still a strong product in a strong market; why not keep it fresher?
  • Bill Wade I was driving a new Subaru a few weeks ago on I-10 near Tucson and it suddenly decided to slam on the brakes from a tumbleweed blowing across the highway. I just about had a heart attack while it nearly threw my mom through the windshield and dumped our grocery bags all over the place. It seems like a bad idea to me, the tech isn't ready.
Next