High Roller: RR Confirms 'Cullinan' as SUV Nameplate

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

The rumor of an SUV from one of luxury’s mightiest brands has been kicking around for about three years now. Today, the folks at Rolls-Royce confirmed they will be calling it the Cullinan. Hey, at least it’s better than Urus.

In the spirit of not playing by any rules whatsoever, Rolls is referring to the Cullinan as a “high-bodied car.” Well, then. *adjusts monocle*

“The name Cullinan has been hiding in plain sight since we revealed it as the project name some years ago,” said Torsten Müller-Ötvös, Chief Executive Officer of Rolls-Royce, in an official statement from the company. “It is the most fitting name for our extraordinary new product.”

Deploying words such as flawless, quality, and preciousness, Rolls is not simply flinging around pithy phrases, but is intentionally evoking thoughts of expensive diamonds. Gems do certainly align with the brand but, more importantly, the largest flawless diamond ever found was called the Cullinan diamond. Good company to keep, then.

Ever since the oddly styled Bentley Bentayga arrived for the 2016 model year, a Roller SUV was all but a certainty. You just knew there was no way its former stablemate was going to let it get away with cashing in on the SUV boom all by itself.

Spy shots provided by the manufacturer (so they’re not really spy shots at all, actually) show a familiar-ish two box shape with a large and upright chrome snout like that which is found on the Phantom. Unconfirmed reports bouncing around the web peg the Cullinan’s length in excess of 218 inches, more than a foot longer than the Bentayga. Could the Rolls seat seven?

Perhaps there will be two available interior configurations from the factory, resting on the same platform. One could be the seven-passenger model mentioned above, while the other could ditch the third row in favor of two thrones pushed rearward for maximum legroom and levels of luxury heretofore unseen in the SUV game. That’s all speculation, of course, but certainly not too far fetched if that length dimension is even close to correct.

Expect to find a V12 under the bonnet hood when the Cullinan reaches market. Given today’s concern for Johnny Polar Bear, a plug-in hybrid is a good bet, too. The company didn’t get into plebian details such as price or release date.

Last month, Rolls Royce sold about 100 vehicles in America, so any addition to the lineup – especially of the SUV variety – will surely result in a significant sales bump. Ones thing’s for sure: with the newly refreshed G-Wagen, Bentayga, and Urus, the world’s 1 percent will be spoilt for choice when choosing their next bus for the school run.

[Images: Rolls-Royce]

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 27 comments
  • Ronnie Schreiber Ronnie Schreiber on Feb 13, 2018

    Makes a better name for a vehicle than naming it after the Hope diamond.

  • Amca Amca on Feb 14, 2018

    I'm ashamed to admit I'm beginning to think I might like the looks of this beast. I'm seeing shades of the early-mid '60s Silver Clouds, big tall sedans. These just have a square back end and a hatch.

  • MaintenanceCosts I wish more vehicles in our market would be at or under 70" wide. Narrowness makes everything easier in the city.
  • El scotto They should be supping with a very, very long spoon.
  • El scotto [list=1][*]Please make an EV that's not butt-ugly. Not Jaguar gorgeous but Buick handsome will do.[/*][*] For all the golf cart dudes: A Tesla S in Plaid mode will be the fastest ride you'll ever take.[/*][*]We have actual EV owners posting on here. Just calmly stated facts and real world experience. This always seems to bring out those who would argue math.[/*][/list=1]For some people an EV will never do, too far out in the country, taking trips where an EV will need recharged, etc. If you own a home and can charge overnight an EV makes perfect sense. You're refueling while you're sleeping.My condo association is allowing owners to install chargers. You have to pay all of the owners of the parking spaces the new electric service will cross. Suggested fee is 100$ and the one getting a charger pays all the legal and filing fees. I held out for a bottle of 30 year old single malt.Perhaps high end apartments will feature reserved parking spaces with chargers in the future. Until then non home owners are relying on public charge and one of my neighbors is in IT and he charges at work. It's call a perk.I don't see company owned delivery vehicles that are EV's. The USPS and the smiley boxes should be the 1st to do this. Nor are any of our mega car dealerships doing this and but of course advertising this fact.I think a great many of the EV haters haven't came to the self-actualization that no one really cares what you drive. I can respect and appreciate what you drive but if I was pushed to answer, no I really don't care what you drive. Before everyone goes into umbrage over my last sentence, I still like cars. Especially yours.I have heated tiles in my bathroom and my kitchen. The two places you're most likely to be barefoot. An EV may fall into to the one less thing to mess with for many people.Macallan for those who were wondering.
  • EBFlex The way things look in the next 5-10 years no. There are no breakthroughs in battery technology coming, the charging infrastructure is essentially nonexistent, and the price of entry is still way too high.As soon as an EV can meet the bar set by ICE in range, refueling times, and price it will take off.
  • Jalop1991 Way to bury the lead. "Toyota to offer two EVs in the states"!
Next