As Pickups Become Family Vehicles, GM Vows to Correct Crew Cab Shortage

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

When thinking of a four-door pickup dating from before the current century, one envisions work crews heading to a construction or logging site. Now, these vehicles ferry mom, dad, Caden, and Brayden to Lowes.

The transformation of the pickup from utilitarian hauler to plush, well-appointed family ferry has done wonders for truck sales in North America, with automakers giving thanks for the high-margin boost to their bottom line. However, keeping up with changing preferences isn’t always easy.

General Motors knows that, in order to keep up with its rivals, it needs to build many more crew cab versions of its next-generation Chevrolet Silverado and GMC Sierra.

Speaking to Automotive News, GM product chief Mark Reuss said production of crew cab full-size pickups has been “constrained,” but there’s a plan afoot to change this.

“We’re solving things like that,” Reuss said, without going into further detail. GM claims crew cab models grew from over 50 percent of its full-size pickup sales in 2013 to over 60 percent today. Sales of Chevrolet full-size pickups rose 1.9 percent last year, with its GMC Sierra sibling dropping 1.7 percent in a segment that grew 5.6 percent.

The next-generation Silverado (which debuts Saturday in Detroit) and Sierra call three factories home. Crew cab light-duty models hail from Silao, Mexico, while regular and double cab pickups come from Fort Wayne, Indiana. Flint, Michigan builds heavy duty variants in both cab configurations, as well as light-duty Silverado crew and regular cabs.

Having spent $3 billion retooling the plants, GM needs to satisfy as many customers as possible with the new models. We’ve already had a glimpse of the 2019 Silverado, seen above, while the next-gen Sierra remains shrouded in mystery.

Judging by a report we brought you in 2016, it seems likely the Flint plant will play a role in the boosted crew cab output. According to a UAW shop chairman, GM decided to send additional Silverado 1500 production to Michigan starting last year, after its Mexican truck plant couldn’t satisfy demand.

[Image: General Motors]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 41 comments
  • Sportyaccordy Sportyaccordy on Jan 10, 2018

    Crew cab = G37 sedan Extended cab = G37 coupe Regular cab = 370Z After driving a U-Haul Sierra I dig the whole pickup thing now... though I don't think I'd want one any bigger than that version, and I'd need AWD. RWD trucks have awful traction

  • Vvk Vvk on Jan 11, 2018

    This is terrifying! These things are extremely dangerous to regular cars in a collision. Having driven a crew cab F-150 recently, I can think of the only reason why it would be so popular -- cowardly people buying the biggest and heaviest vehicle they can afford. Because they are scared. They want to win in a crash against another vehicle. This is an arms race that can only lead to bigger and heavier monsters clogging up American highways. The F-150 I drove was just amazingly bad at everything, except being incredibly big. No pleasure can be extracted from driving one. The suspension is terrible, the steering is terrible, the cabin is extremely uncomfortable. It is extremely difficult to climb up into. Little kids need assistance because they cannot reach that high. Old people cannot climb in at all. The interior is incredibly wasteful of space with huge seats and huge center console. The bed is not possible to use to carry anything because it is just too high to reach. It cannot be parked without taking up the entire width of a parking space that makes the doors impossible to open without hitting the vehicle parked next to you. It does not fit in a garage. It does not fit in the driveway. It does not fit in the city. The tires cost a fortune to replace. Did I mention it is terrible to drive? Utterly disgusting! I can see people using these for work, although it seems that a reasonably sized van would be more economical and practical. But I cannot see using one as a family vehicle. It fails on all counts at that, except for winning in a two vehicle crash.

    • Vulpine Vulpine on Jan 11, 2018

      Glad to see someone agrees with my depiction of them as Road Whales™. They're simply too big to be safe and a huge proportion of single-vehicle accidents with them are fatal... not even considering the effects of multi-vehicle accidents against smaller vehicles.

  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Off-road fluff on vehicles that should not be off road needs to die.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Saw this posted on social media; “Just bought a 2023 Tundra with the 14" screen. Let my son borrow it for the afternoon, he connected his phone to listen to his iTunes.The next day my insurance company raised my rates and added my son to my policy. The email said that a private company showed that my son drove the vehicle. He already had his own vehicle that he was insuring.My insurance company demanded he give all his insurance info and some private info for proof. He declined for privacy reasons and my insurance cancelled my policy.These new vehicles with their tech are on condition that we give up our privacy to enter their world. It's not worth it people.”
Next