Automakers Take Stock After Major Metal Supplier Admits Selling Shoddy Aluminum

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

It’s often hard to remove an ingredient after the cake’s emerged from the oven. Because of this, news of Kobe Steel’s falsified inspection reports no doubt came with a fair bit of nervous collar tugging for executives at several automakers.

The Japanese company, which has subsidiaries in numerous countries, is a go-to supplier for the automotive and aircraft industries, providing steel, copper and aluminum components to companies as diverse as Ford and Boeing. Last week, Kobe admitted to selling substandard (or suspected substandard) materials to 500 companies, among them Ford, Volvo, Toyota, Honda, Nissan, Mitsubishi, and possibly Mazda.

Oh, and Mercedes-Benz, Tesla, General Motors, Hyundai, and Renault.

Maybe you’ve heard of them.

The shocking admission appears to be the product of a company-wide culture of deception. Multiple plants reported falsified data. Now, manufacturers are struggling to determine exactly what parts went in what vehicles, and whether it’s anything to worry about.

In Japan, Kobe components are used to connect wheels to 200-mph bullet trains operated by the Central Japan Railway Company. The company claims the materials with substandard (or potentially substandard) strength and durability specs include aluminum extrusions, copper piping, aluminum castings and forgings, and flat-rolled aluminum.

At Ford, which recently gave its F-150 and Super Duty line a healthy dose of weight-saving aluminum, only the Chinese-market Mondeo sedan’s hood is suspect. The automaker, like others, is working to identify all Kobe-supplied parts. For its part, Kobe says it will release findings on new safety checks on the affected products within two weeks. Within a month, it should have an answer to why this happened in the first place, plus a plan on how to deal with it.

Also, CEO Hiroya Kawasaki says he might resign once quality inspections wrap up. The company is “intent on shouldering the costs” borne by affected companies, should that occur, Kawasaki said last week.

Despite the breadth of the scandal, no company has yet flagged a product as posing a specific safety concern.

[Sources: Bloomberg, Automotive News] [Image: Volvo Cars]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 31 comments
  • CRacK hEaD aLLeY CRacK hEaD aLLeY on Oct 16, 2017

    A cheer for VW for only cheating on emissions. It could have been worse: assembly via child or slave labor and using Kobe steel.

    • See 1 previous
    • W210Driver W210Driver on Oct 17, 2017

      @nels0300 Pretty much all German and Japanese companies used slave labor during the Second World War. Their respective governments encouraged this behavior because slave labor is cheap and can easily be replaced by simply kidnapping and enslaving more people.

  • Ra_pro Ra_pro on Oct 17, 2017

    I am somewhat surprised to hear these stories about large Japanese corporations. What shocks me even more that these scandals are not followed by public seppuku of the management. That's not the Japan I remember hearing about. Anyway to VW, I was in Europe in the summer and on the news I heard that I believe it was ADAC that conducted a study which showed that German diesel engines were on average 4-5 times cleaner that the rest of the auto industry. But it didn't explain why then VW needed to cheat government inspections if their diesels were so much better than others.

  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh haaaaaaaaaaahahahahahahahaha
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh *Why would anyone buy this* when the 2025 RamCharger is right around the corner, *faster* with vastly *better mpg* and stupid amounts of torque using a proven engine layout and motivation drive in use since 1920.
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh I hate this soooooooo much. but the 2025 RAMCHARGER is the CORRECT bridge for people to go electric. I hate dodge (thanks for making me buy 2 replacement 46RH's) .. but the ramcharger's electric drive layout is *vastly* superior to a full electric car in dense populous areas where charging is difficult and where moron luddite science hating trumpers sabotage charges or block them.If Toyota had a tundra in the same config i'd plop 75k cash down today and burn my pos chevy in the dealer parking lot
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh I own my house 100% paid for at age 52. the answer is still NO.-28k (realistically) would take 8 years to offset my gas truck even with its constant repair bills (thanks chevy)-Still takes too long to charge UNTIL solidsate batteries are a thing and 80% in 15 minutes becomes a reality (for ME anyways, i get others are willing to wait)For the rest of the market, especially people in dense cityscape, apartments dens rentals it just isnt feasible yet IMO.
  • ToolGuy I do like the fuel economy of a 6-cylinder engine. 😉
Next