GM Claims Venezuela Illegally Seized Its Factory, Ends Operations in the Country

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

If your news diet occasionally strays outside of the automotive realm, then you know that Venezuela is going through a “transitional phase.” The country’s economy is experiencing uncontrollable inflation, unemployment is around 25 percent, food is scarce, and public health services have become nonexistent. There is also more political turmoil than any single country could possibly handle. Venezuela’s capital of Caracas is now a hotbed of increasingly violent protests, as critics of President Nicolas Maduro are met with heavily armed security forces.

The opposition blames Maduro and the Supreme Court for turning the country in to a dictatorship after dissolving the National Assembly’s ability to govern. There are also claims that the leftist government is overstepping its bounds when it comes to property rights.

While you wouldn’t expect an automaker to weigh in on the matter, General Motors is accusing Venezuelan authorities of the illegal seizure of a plant in the industrial center of Valencia and has vowed to “take all legal actions” necessary to defend its rights. It’s also ceasing operations within the country.

“Yesterday, GMV’s (General Motors Venezolana) plant was unexpectedly taken by the public authorities, preventing normal operations. In addition, other assets of the company, such as vehicles, have been illegally taken from its facilities,” the company said in a statement.

According to El Carabobeno, the action was taken as part of a lawsuit against General Motors Venezolana filed 17 years ago, after the country nullified contracts with Chevrolet dealers in the city of Maracaibo due to insufficient performance. The plaintiffs requested compensation equivalent to 4.8 billion dollars, a number which GM said would cripple its Venezuelan operations permanently. However, the factory in question has been indefinitely idled since 2016 after suffering repeated material shortages for over two years.

GM blamed the plant’s troubles on the country’s failing infrastructure and stated that the amount of money requested “exceeds all logic.” It had also previously rejected the adoption of a system that permitted it to sell vehicles with mixed payments in U.S. dollars and local currency after witnessing Toyota and Ford struggling under the plan. Meanwhile, GM has continuously lowered its expectations in South America and scaled back its involvement.

The recent seizure in Venezuela has forced an “immediate cessation of its operations in the country.” In its official statement, GM accused local officials of causing “irreparable damage” to the company, its 2,678 workers, and 79 dealers inside the country. GM said it would pay separation benefits “as far as the authorities permit.”Arndt Ellinghorst, an automotive analyst for Evercore ISI, suggests that the overall impact on GM’s finances may be minimal, as the company didn’t expect to sell many cars there this year.

As for the legality of the issue, article 112 and 115 of the Constitution of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela state that “all persons may freely engage in an economic activity of their choice” and that “the right of ownership is guaranteed.” However, there are exceptions. When supported by a court judgement, companies or persons that have committed crimes against public property, enriched themselves illicitly, or engaged in criminal behavior (such as drug trafficking) are still subject to confiscation. And the interpretation of the law broadened following former president Hugo Chávez’s re-election in December 2006 — especially toward North American business interests.

[Image: Michael Kumm/ Flickr ( CC BY 2.0)]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 75 comments
  • Jeff S Jeff S on Apr 21, 2017

    @chuckrs--Yes Venezuela does have lots of crude, but not all crude is the same. There are different grades of crude depending on the sulfur content. Venezuela has high sulfur crude better known as heavy crude. Few countries and few refineries can refine high sulfur crude. The US and China are among the few that can refine the heavy crude which produces less refined product. At best heavy crude is worth about half of what sweet lower sulfur intermediate crude. Not making any excuses for the dictatorship in Venezuela. China has been making alliances and trade deals with South American countries for their resources and China has become the largest trading partner with these countries. GM will write this seized plant off on their taxes. @Lou_BC--True US policy didn't help South America, if anything it lead to the existing dictatorships in South America. US reputation was not helped when the CIA aided in the removal of a freely elected leader.

  • I_Deal_with_Facts I_Deal_with_Facts on Apr 21, 2017

    @Lou_BC There are still no facts that Trump is buddies with Putin, let alone that there was any Russian involvement in the elections.

  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Off-road fluff on vehicles that should not be off road needs to die.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Saw this posted on social media; “Just bought a 2023 Tundra with the 14" screen. Let my son borrow it for the afternoon, he connected his phone to listen to his iTunes.The next day my insurance company raised my rates and added my son to my policy. The email said that a private company showed that my son drove the vehicle. He already had his own vehicle that he was insuring.My insurance company demanded he give all his insurance info and some private info for proof. He declined for privacy reasons and my insurance cancelled my policy.These new vehicles with their tech are on condition that we give up our privacy to enter their world. It's not worth it people.”
  • TheEndlessEnigma Poor planning here, dropping a Vinfast dealer in Pensacola FL is just not going to work. I love Pensacola and that part of the Gulf Coast, but that area is by no means an EV adoption demographic.
Next