Toyota Launches C-HR In April, Plans To Unveil Another Subcompact Crossover At The New York Auto Show In April

Timothy Cain
by Timothy Cain

Toyota hasn’t even delivered the new 2018 C-HR to dealers and there are already plans to supplement the automaker’s subcompact crossover lineup.

In concert with the C-HR’s U.S. launch next month, April 2017 will also play host to the Toyota debut of a small crossover concept at the New York International Auto Show if all goes according to plan.

“I think we’re very well set up (with the C-HR and midsize RAV4 CUV), but we’re also kind of looking at what else could we be doing there if this continues to be a growing segment, which we anticipate it will,” Bill Fay, vice president for the Toyota division, told Wards Auto.

Toyota expects to sell 60,000 C-HRs in the United States annually, more than the Yaris, Yaris iA, and Prius C combined. For America’s third-highest-volume SUV brand, that’s apparently not enough.

Slip an extra SUV on the barbie.

It’s not difficult to understand why the nascent subcompact crossover segment holds such appeal to automakers. The subcompact cars that have forever existed as a means of courting young and first-time new car buyers have never been the providers of significant profit in North America, where consumers are five times more likely to choose a more refined, spacious, and powerful compact with little financial or fuel economy penalty.

But take that subcompact platform and elevate the price, sometimes dramatically, and the equation is flipped on its head.

Just look at Mazda, formerly a niche player in the subcompact car category with the Mazda 2 and now a lower-tier candidate in the subcompact crossover category. In 2014, Mazda sold fewer than 14,000 copies of the Mazda 2, priced roughly between $15,000–17,000. In 2016, the Mazda CX-3 — at its core, an elevated next-generation Mazda 2 — attracted nearly 19,000 buyers with MSRPs ranging from $20,900–27,180 — and an inordinately high number of the CX-3s sold are of the more costly sort.

With the lure of greater profit potential and the clear shift in demand toward utility vehicles across the industry, automakers are stocking up their small CUV shelves.

To the Nissan Rogue and Juke ( and/or the Nissan Kicks), Nissan will fill an apparent void with the Rogue Sport, a rebadged Qashqai.

Below the Cherokee, Jeep will sell the new tweener-sized Compass along with the Renegade, a subcompact crossover sales leader.

General Motors taps two different subcompact CUV price points with the Chevrolet Trax and Buick Encore, which together owned nearly 30 percent of America’s subcompact crossover market in 2016.

Mitsubishi will squeeze the ghastly Eclipse Cross in between a smaller Outlander Sport and the Outlander.

And before Toyota sells its first C-HR in America, Toyota clearly intends to investigate the possibility of a C-HR cohort. In fact, based on Bill Fay’s language to Wards, the investigatory period may well be past the concept stage. Pointing to the hyperactivity in the segment, “I think everybody is looking at, ‘What’s the best way to meet that customer demand?'” Fay says.

Of course, an all-wheel-drive option would at least propel the 2018 Toyota C-HR into the center of the subcompact crossover argument. Available with AWD in other markets, the C-HR arrives in the United States with front-wheel drive, a 144-horsepower 2.0-liter four-cylinder, and dimensions that essentially match the old Toyota Matrix.

Another subcompact crossover? The Toyota C-HR doesn’t even meet the TTAC Slack chat definition of a crossover. Perhaps Toyota’s New York concept car debut will.

Toyota has shown small SUV concepts in the recent past: the Urban Utility in 2014 and the ME.WE in 2013, pictured above.

More recently, U.S. sales of subcompact crossovers are up 13 percent through the first two months of 2017 in a overall market that’s declined nearly 2 percent.

Timothy Cain is the founder of GoodCarBadCar.net, which obsesses over the free and frequent publication of U.S. and Canadian auto sales figures. Follow on Twitter @goodcarbadcar and on Facebook.

Timothy Cain
Timothy Cain

More by Timothy Cain

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 28 comments
  • Anthony Magagnoli Anthony Magagnoli on Mar 03, 2017

    This whole compact SUV segment makes me sick. The cars are heavier, taller, slower, less fuel efficient, costlier, ride more harshly, handle worse, and have less interior space. Just so that buyers can say they have a “crossover”. It’s ridiculous. I love everything that Mazda makes, notably the Mazda3 and the CX-5, yet I loathe the CX-3. The reorientation of the great Mazda3 into a crossover simply ruins it for all the reasons stated above. My fiancee' is interested in the C-HR. We'll go drive it when it comes out and she'll likely realize that 133hp will be wholly unsatisfying after having been driving 6-cyl BMW's for a couple years. If someone wants a Toyota in this segment, the iM is a much better choice, yet it's cheaper for a better car!

    • Rolando Rolando on Mar 05, 2017

      I dislike CUVs in General. But for Mazda, it makes sense to "GLA" the the 3 into a "CX4" and collect the $$$. Keep a low end "sport" model for the 3 and a "lowered" CX4 Speed model for us drivers!

  • OldManPants OldManPants on Mar 03, 2017

    You ain't gettin' no dishwasher home in that crumpled-up little ball of ugly.

    • See 1 previous
    • OldManPants OldManPants on Mar 04, 2017

      @TonyJZX Well, yeah... I was kinda just using dishwasher as a universally grasped volume reference but OK, Mr. Picky, you ain't bringin' home Oddjob's compacted Continental nor History's largest Chunky bar in one, neither.

  • Lou_BC I read an interesting post by a master engine builder. He's having a hard time finding quality parts anywhere. The other issue is most young men don't want to learn the engine building trade. He's got so much work that he will now only work on engines his shop is restoring.
  • Tim Myers Can you tell me why in the world Mazda uses the ugliest colors on the MX5? I have a 2017 in Red and besides Black or White, the other colors are horrible for a sports car. I constantly hear this complaint. I wish someone would tell whoever makes theses decisions that they need a more sports car colors available. They’d probably sell a lot more of them. Just saying.
  • Dartman EBFlex will soon be able to buy his preferred brand!
  • Mebgardner I owned 4 different Z cars beginning with a 1970 model. I could already row'em before buying the first one. They were light, fast, well powered, RWD, good suspenders, and I loved working on them myself when needed. Affordable and great styling, too. On the flip side, parts were expensive and mostly only available in a dealers parts dept. I could live with those same attributes today, but those days are gone long gone. Safety Regulations and Import Regulations, while good things, will not allow for these car attributes at the price point I bought them at.I think I will go shop a GT-R.
  • Lou_BC Honda plans on investing 15 billion CAD. It appears that the Ontario government and Federal government will provide tax breaks and infrastructure upgrades to the tune of 5 billion CAD. This will cover all manufacturing including a battery plant. Honda feels they'll save 20% on production costs having it all localized and in house.As @ Analoggrotto pointed out, another brilliant TTAC press release.
Next