Subaru Is Way Too Reliant On U.S. Market, Needs A New Market, Chooses Sweet Land Of Liberty

Timothy Cain
by Timothy Cain

“Washington is not a place to live in. The rents are high, the food is bad, the dust is disgusting and the morals are deplorable. Go South, young man, go South and grow up with the country.” —Not Horace Greeley

Subaru generates 60 percent of its global sales in the United States. For a Japanese brand that still relies on imports for half of its volume in its largest market, Subaru knows that 60-percent reliance on America is way too high.

Subaru needs strength in other markets. Subaru needs to diversify its portfolio. Subaru needs another America.

Unfortunately for Subaru, history suggests the brand won’t quickly find strength in other markets. History suggests Subaru’s attempts to diversify its portfolio won’t succeed.

Fortunately for Subaru, however, there is more America.

“It’s true we want to increase sales in other countries, but in terms of the place with the best chance to increase sales, it has to be America’s Sun Belt,” Yasuyuki Yoshinaga, CEO at Subaru’s Fuji Heavy Industries parent company, told Bloomberg.

In other words, Subaru wants to add some New Orleans to its order of New Hampshire; Burlington with a side of Birmingham; Kennebunkport supplemented with a dose of Port St. Lucie.

When it comes to offshore alternatives, Subaru is shorthanded.

In Europe’s two biggest markets, Germany and the United Kingdom, Subaru’s market share currently stands at 0.2 percent and 0.1 percent, respectively, hardly the strong foundations on which significant growth can be formulated.

Subaru owns just 0.2 percent of the Chinese market and has no presence in India.

As a result, Subaru’s eyes are drawn back to the United States, where Subaru has garnered record annual sales in eight consecutive years, a streak which began during the depths of the recession. Subaru has more than doubled its U.S. volume since 2011 and essentially tripled its U.S. volume since 2009.

Subaru, therefore, fears no downturn in the U.S. market, widely expected to be a modest one if it turns out the industry peaked in 2017. Subaru has proven its ability in the past to overcome poor U.S. economic conditions. With improved availability, Subaru believes it could do so again. But the brand’s U.S. horizons must be expanded, as Yoshinaga told Bloomberg, “There’s no other way for us” besides U.S. concentration.

There are certainly states open for business if Subaru can find a way to convert its rugged, all-wheel-drive appeal in the northeast, northwest, and mountain states to a message that appeals to buyers who don’t encounter snow, ice, and slush.

Subaru will want to play up its reliability, safety, and resale reputations where AWD is a less meaningful feature. On Consumer Reports’ 2017 list of the best brands, Subaru ranked fifth overall and first among mainstream auto brands. At the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, the Crosstrek and WRX are Top Safety Picks; the Impreza, Forester, Legacy, and Outback earn Top Safety Pick+ ratings. In ALG’s residual value awards, Subaru leads all mainstream brands, with the Impreza, Legacy, WRX, Crosstrek, Forester, and Outback all winning their respective categories.

If Subaru wants to sell more cars, however, the automaker must continue to battle a good problem: poor supply. Heading into February, Subaru had only 36 days of U.S. inventory — 60 days would be more appropriate. This low level of supply and high level of demand has allowed Subaru to keep incentives low and profit margins high. According to ALG, Subaru’s incentive spending in February averaged just $896 per vehicle in an industry that spent $3,443 per vehicle. That equals a modest 3-percent discount on Subaru vehicles when the industry offers 10-percent discounts. Bloomberg says Subaru’ 2016 Q4 profit margin, at 11.6 percent, was industry-leading.

Through the first two months of 2017, as U.S. auto sales fell 1.5 percent compared with the same period one year earlier, Subaru volume jumped 7.5 percent. Rapid Outback growth, significant Impreza improvements, and Forester and Crosstrek increases have all played a role.

Timothy Cain is the founder of GoodCarBadCar.net, which obsesses over the free and frequent publication of U.S. and Canadian auto sales figures. Follow on Twitter @goodcarbadcar and on Facebook.

Timothy Cain
Timothy Cain

More by Timothy Cain

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 92 comments
  • CincyDavid CincyDavid on Mar 16, 2017

    I think of Subaru as the successor to SAAB...quirky cars that they sell for relatively big bucks to people who are politically left-of-center.

    • 28-Cars-Later 28-Cars-Later on Mar 16, 2017

      I couldn't speak for SAAB but Subaru finds buyers of all kinds in this neck of the woods.

  • CincyDavid CincyDavid on Mar 16, 2017

    I tried to edit my previous comment because I hit SEND prematurely...wouldn't let me. At any rate, my sister and her spouse used to have 2 Jeep Libertys, and as they have fallen apart, they've been replaced with stripped down Subaru "tall wagons". They seem happy so far, but that's the only direct exposure I've ever had to Subaru products. I'm not convinced of the value of 4wd/AWD, even in hilly SW Ohio...the only time it kicks in with our Sportage and CRV is if I spin the tires leaving a stop sign, on the painted stripe in the road...then the rear wheels MIGHT engage with a clunk, and only momentarily.

  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh A prelude is a bad idea. There is already Acura with all the weird sport trims. This will not make back it's R&D money.
  • Analoggrotto I don't see a red car here, how blazing stupid are you people?
  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
Next