Jeep Tries to Hide the Compass' Ugly Older Sister as New Model Bows

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Thanks to the weird and inexact science of pinning down a model year for a new introduction, Jeep finds itself playing a game of “hide the Compass.” The old Compass, that is.

You know the one. Barely updated over its decade-long lifespan, hated by TTAC but loved by consumers? That Compass. Certainly not the larger, second-generation model, with its new platform, upgraded looks and carryover engine. That global model is the one Jeep wants everyone to know about and, of course, buy.

Unfortunately, the model year conventions found in some overseas countries means the global model launching this spring carries a 2017 designation. As does the final cohort of the old Compass.

If you weren’t there for the funeral, the Jeep Patriot and Compass twins walked the Green Mile back on December 23. There’s still plenty of stock left ( Jeep sold 2,737 units in February), but the new Compass looms large. Trying to pin down an exact on-sale date has proven difficult, though Jeep lists “late spring” as its dealership debut.

That leaves Jeep with the odd problem of having two wholly different models with the same name and model year. Unlike other models that soldiered on alongside a next-generation sibling as a fleet or value option — older-generation Impalas, Malibus, and the Canadian fourth-generation Golf and Jetta come to mind — this overlap is just temporary. No need to affix a “Classic” or “City” to the name.

To solve this annoying issue, Jeep has taken an obvious approach. Get the old model out the door and out of the way while calling absolutely no attention to it. The automaker’s website lists no 2017 Compass, though it does herald the 2017 “All-New Compass.” The now-defunct Patriot remains.

As for when the “All-New Compass” drops the 2017 prefix, well, that’s another unknown.

While Jeep has already shoved the old Compass behind the curtain, there’s still deals to be had on remaining models — not that you’ll read about it on the website. Automotive research site CarsDirect.com claims there’s good deals to be had for buyers who aren’t concerned by the old model’s obsolescence.

“Most versions still feature $3,500 cashback, plus a $500 bonus for financing at non-promotional rates,” writes Alex Bernstein, the site’s senior pricing analyst. “There’s even a $1,000 lease conquest bonus for anyone coming from a non-Chrysler lease. Alternatively, you can choose 0% financing for 60 months plus $1,000 cashback.”

Bernstein claims he’s seen a local dealer asking $14,500 for a 2017 Compass, based on an original MSRP of $22,285.

[Image: Fiat Chrysler Automobiles]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 19 comments
  • Armadamaster Armadamaster on Mar 22, 2017

    Dump them into the rental fleets and be done with it.

  • Bpscarguy Bpscarguy on Mar 24, 2017

    My E Class Mercedes was rear ended 2 weeks ago and they gave me a Compass as a rental. I've always heard the talk and read the abysmal reviews, but Oh. My. God. It truly is completely horrible. There are no redeeming qualities. It does nothing well, or even close. Even my wife, who does not really notice/comment on cars said it was "The worst tin-can POS she has ever driven in her life". Agreed. After 4 days, I could not take it anymore. I took it back and got a Sonata. The Sonata is a nice car and absolute heaven after being in that Compass. But I still can't wait to get the Mercedes back...

  • Dartman https://apnews.com/article/artificial-intelligence-fighter-jets-air-force-6a1100c96a73ca9b7f41cbd6a2753fdaAutonomous/Ai is here now. The question is implementation and acceptance.
  • FreedMike If Dodge were smart - and I don't think they are - they'd spend their money refreshing and reworking the Durango (which I think is entering model year 3,221), versus going down the same "stuff 'em full of motor and give 'em cool new paint options" path. That's the approach they used with the Charger and Challenger, and both those models are dead. The Durango is still a strong product in a strong market; why not keep it fresher?
  • Bill Wade I was driving a new Subaru a few weeks ago on I-10 near Tucson and it suddenly decided to slam on the brakes from a tumbleweed blowing across the highway. I just about had a heart attack while it nearly threw my mom through the windshield and dumped our grocery bags all over the place. It seems like a bad idea to me, the tech isn't ready.
  • FreedMike I don't get the business case for these plug-in hybrid Jeep off roaders. They're a LOT more expensive (almost fourteen grand for the four-door Wrangler) and still get lousy MPG. They're certainly quick, but the last thing the Wrangler - one of the most obtuse-handling vehicles you can buy - needs is MOOOAAAARRRR POWER. In my neck of the woods, where off-road vehicles are big, the only 4Xe models I see of the wrangler wear fleet (rental) plates. What's the point? Wrangler sales have taken a massive plunge the last few years - why doesn't Jeep focus on affordability and value versus tech that only a very small part of its' buyer base would appreciate?
  • Bill Wade I think about my dealer who was clueless about uConnect updates and still can't fix station presets disappearing and the manufacturers want me to trust them and their dealers to address any self driving concerns when they can't fix a simple radio?Right.
Next