Volkswagen Shouldn't Bother Creating an Enthusiast's Passat

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Volkswagen is toying with the idea of creating a hot, performance-oriented Passat variant that grabs people’s souls, assaults their eyes and won’t let go of their imagination. It shouldn’t bother.

According to Motor Authority, the automaker wants to wring more sales out of its increasingly overlooked midsizer by appealing to the enthusiast set. Even with visual cues and a power boost, it’s extremely unlikely that Golf fanboys will move their lust (and cash) to the Passat camp.

If Volkswagen wants to halt falling sales, it needs to change the foundation and house, not just paint the window trim.

The Motor Authority report describes a concept housed in Volkswagen’s Chattanooga development center. They describe it as “a white Passat with black mirrors, a black-painted roof, a black lip spoiler on its deck lid, black badging, revised tail lamps and red accents on its fascia and brake calipers.”

Other design cues set it apart from the duller R-Line, and the body has been lowered by 20 millimeters. Engineers still haven’t figured out what engine to use. The 1.8-liter turbocharged four cylinder is an obvious choice (but not very exclusive), while the 3.6-liter V6 would add a good measure of power and price.

U.S. sales of the current-generation Passat peaked in 2012 (117,023 units), falling every year since. The 2015 tally was 78,207, and 2016 figures reveal even less demand. It doesn’t help that the once-appealing 2.0-liter diesel is now sidelined by scandal.

The Passat has some bright spots, interior space being one, but it’s losing the midsize sedan battle. In fact, the midsize sedan is losing its own battle, with buyers increasingly turning to crossovers and SUVs. A handful of midsizers are bucking the trend, with the Accord, Sonata, Legacy and Malibu picking up sales, but its a contracting marketplace.

To stand out and attract buyers, the basic package must be appealing. Specialty models are mostly PR. Ford plans to offer a power-packed, all-wheel-drive Fusion Sport next year, but it also sells a hell of a lot of base and mid-range Fusions.

All Volkswagen can offer is a bland styling that’s barely discernible from the pre-refresh model, with no all-wheel drive and a very expensive V6 option. It needs to do better in the styling department and offer competitive horsepower in sub-premium models. That means sourcing a 2.0-liter turbo from the Volkswagen Group parts bin and trying to hack out a mid-range niche.

According to the report, executives in Wolfsburg haven’t approved this “hot” Passat. They’d be better off focusing their efforts on the Passat’s long game and correcting its flaws.

[Image: Volkswagen of America]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 75 comments
  • Testacles Megalos Testacles Megalos on Jul 26, 2016

    Starting with the pictured car, to get to an interesting Passat, perhaps called the Passat Track. (can't use "S", already taken by Audi, and besides, Audi’s S line has become 30% more money for 5% more content…. Perhaps Porsche would let VW use "GTS" because that's really what the car could be, a sports grand tourer). 1. Lose the ridiculous trapezoid chin ubiquitous to Japanese cars; makes cars look like carps. From the bumper surface down, make it a continuous slight radius back with two large openings/air intakes, one on either side of a central pillar and each occupying about 30% of the surface. Give it a subtle splitter shelf, dark color. 2. Keep the big wheels (19s?) but make them 245 or 255s. 3. Four pot brake calipers (NOT Boy Racer Red) all around, no sliders. 4. Coil-over suspension all around 5. Twin-turbo V6 and a 6 speed gearbox, with an optional PDK. 6. Quaife-based AWD with a rear-drive bias. I want to be able to set this car with the throttle without having to first lift or LFB. 7. Having said that, any electronic aids need to be switchable (including complete “OFF”, and that means left foot braking capability without killing the power!!!) 8. Recaro seating. 9. Only available colors: Meteor Gray, or Guards Red, both with the opposite color very subtle door decal “Passat GTS” just below the belt line between the wheel wells, block letters. 10. Offer it in an Avant version (maybe I just spec’ed out a late ‘90s Audi Avant RS4???) Build that car, VW, and I’ll stick with your brand after you buy my diesel Sportwagen back from me.

  • Matt3319 Matt3319 on Jul 27, 2016

    Picking up my Fortana Red Passat R-Line tonight. Got LED package with comfort package. Only 1/6 in the country according to the dealer search. The 1.8T was much much better than I thought. I will have room galore and sweet 19" wheels. Bye bye Jeep Cherokee Trailhawk.

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next