Honda Is Already Selling Ridgelines Like It's 2008

Timothy Cain
by Timothy Cain

American Honda reported 2,472 sales of its all-new, second-generation Ridgeline pickup in June 2016, the truck’s first month of rather limited availability.

June was the Ridgeline’s first four-digit sales month since August 2014, the Ridgeline’s first month above the 2,000-unit mark since October 2008, and the best Ridgeline sales month since August 2008.

In fact, if American Honda simply maintained the June 2016 sales pace for the rest of the year, total 2016 calendar year Ridgeline sales would essentially match 2013’s total for an eight-year high in U.S. Ridgeline sales.

Indeed, on an annualized rate, based simply on the Ridgeline’s first month back from a long hiatus, Honda is already selling more Ridgelines than at any point since 2008.

Honda will soon be able to sell more Ridgelines. And the truck deserves to sell with far greater frequency than it will. “It’s absolutely phenomenal,” TTAC’s managing editor, Mark Stevenson, wrote after a San Antonio test drive. “The interior of the Ridgeline is vast,” he said. Torque vectoring, Mark wrote, is, “a freak-of-nature feature in the pickup truck segment that gives the unibody truck an unfair advantage when it comes to handling.”

But there are two key factors which will limit Ridgeline volume. First, Honda’s own production limitations. Second, though there’s a bed on the back, the Ridgeline is a unibody vehicle turned into a pickup truck, not a conventional body-on-frame truck like every other pickup on sale in the United States.

PRODUCTION


Honda builds the Ridgeline at its Alabama plant where it also assembles Pilots, Odysseys, and Acura MDXs. (Honda will increase Ridgeline capacity once it moves some MDX production to Ohio.) According to the Automotive News Data Center, Honda only earmarked 12 percent of its Lincoln plant’s production capacity for the Ridgeline in May, the truck’s first month of production. Honda isn’t going to severely alter the production formula to further constrain supply of the Pilot and Odyssey, two higher-volume products, in lieu of a Ridgeline for which Honda has admitted it has “ modest sales expectations.”

Ridgeline sales maxed out at 50,193 units in 2006, the first-generation’s first full year. Honda would like to get back to that level, which would require adding to June’s volume by approximately 70 percent.

Based on the brief sampling period of June, it doesn’t appear as though the Ridgeline will eat into the continued growth achieved by traditional small/midsize pickup trucks.

ALTERNATIVES


Excluding the Ridgeline, sales of a midsize quartet — Tacoma, Colorado, Frontier, Canyon — jumped 24 percent to 36,422 units in June, equal to 16 percent of the U.S. pickup truck market last month.

Including the Ridgeline, sales of non-full-size pickups shot up 32 percent, a gain of 9,401 units versus the full-size sector’s 10-percent improvement, an increase of 16,466 sales powered largely by the Ford F-Series. The midsize sub-segment’s market share grew to 17.3 percent from 14.8 percent a year ago thanks to the addition of the Ridgeline, a 37-percent jump from the GM twins and an 84-percent Nissan Frontier uptick; despite flat Tacoma sales.

The Ridgeline is selling like it’s 2008, surging well beyond the post-recession “achievements” of Honda’s first-gen pickup. But it remains and will likely remain a relative bit player in the pickup truck arena. Only 6.4 percent of the midsize pickups and 1.1 percent of all pickup trucks sold in June 2016 were Hondas. Even if Honda managed to climb back to its best-ever sales pace, don’t expect the Ridgeline’s share to rise above 2 percent.

For Honda, if the Ridgeline doesn’t crumble after rising to such a level, that will be enough.

[Images: © 2016 Mark Stevenson and Timothy Cain/The Truth About Cars, Toyota]

Timothy Cain is the founder of GoodCarBadCar.net, which obsesses over the free and frequent publication of U.S. and Canadian auto sales figures. Follow on Twitter @goodcarbadcar and on Facebook.

Timothy Cain
Timothy Cain

More by Timothy Cain

Comments
Join the conversation
9 of 126 comments
  • Tjh8402 Tjh8402 on Jul 13, 2016

    Glad to see this doing well. I hate the way most other trucks look - their exaggerated toughness screams compensation, especially when you see they aren't actually being used to haul anything. I really appreciate the subdued, normal look of this one. It's an honest get things done utility vehicle. If I needed more towing capabilities than a minivan or the cargo characteristics of a bed, I'd look here first.

    • See 5 previous
    • Tjh8402 Tjh8402 on Jul 14, 2016

      @Carlson Fan as gtemnykh said, Honda did beef up the structure on the Ridgeline. A bigger part of the towing advantage vs a minivan is the AWD. Both the Ridgeline as well as the pilot are only rated at a minivan esq 3500 lbs in FWD configuration. You have to spec the AWD on both to get the 5000 lb rating.

  • SCE to AUX SCE to AUX on Jul 13, 2016

    Honda should run a jump-the-shark ad where a Sierra or F-150 is dumped into its bed, rather than just stones.

  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh A prelude is a bad idea. There is already Acura with all the weird sport trims. This will not make back it's R&D money.
  • Analoggrotto I don't see a red car here, how blazing stupid are you people?
  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
Next