Subaru Hopes BRZ Design Tweaks, Power Bump Get Buyers Hot and Bothered

by Steph Willems

Published: May 27th, 2016

subaru hopes brz design tweaks power bump get buyers hot and bothered

Are modest improvements in looks and power enough to revive consumer interest in the Subaru BRZ? The automaker sure hopes so.

A host of small changes were just announced for the rear-drive coupe’s 2017 model year, which sees its sister car (the ~~Scion FR-S~~ Toyota 86) switch identities. Every change aims to nudge the BRZ closer to what the public feels it should be — a performance car worthy of special status.

Well, looks are the first thing buyers will notice. For 2017, the BRZ’s face grows meaner, with a redesigned front fascia, wider grille and LED headlights. Exterior trim sees some minor changes, and an aluminum spoiler now comes standard on all models.

Underneath, Subaru added chassis reinforcements to boost the BRZ’s rigidity. Suspension upgrades, including a larger rear stabilizer bar, have improved handling in mind.

If you’re the type who likes to show off, the BRZ’s stability control system becomes less intrusive, with a higher threshold to cross before the electronic nannies pounce. Because of this, “sport” mode now becomes “track” mode.

A Performance Package is available for improved braking and suspension feel.

What about power, you ask? Prepare to get excited about five more horsepower and five added pounds-feet of torque, in manual transmission models only. Output now stands at 205 hp and 156 lb-ft, though a lowered final drive ratio (4.3:1, instead of 4.1:1) should help improve acceleration.

In Limited trim, a driver information display will log your BRZ’s handling data in a readout next to the tachometer. Other interior improvements include more convenient audio and display controls.

With the 2017 BRZ, it looks like Subaru took the “everything in moderation” approach to the makeover. With BRZ sales falling since its first full year on the market (2013), are the changes big enough to get consumers excited again?

[Image: Subaru of America]

#2017SubaruBRZ #BRZ #Design #Performance #Styling #Subaru #SubaruBRZ

Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments

Join the conversation

3 of 71 comments

Sportyaccordy on May 28, 2016

Thinking more and more about it, I think they need to combine this with the Impreza/WRX. The big hurdle is the form factor. It's pretty much a 2 seater. If they took the Impreza platform, configured it in RWD, and punched out the BRZ's motor to 2.5L.... or better yet, just went with a 3.0L flat 6, I think a lot of people would take notice. I wouldn't be caught dead in a WRX with that ghastly wing and cheesy interior, but I'm OK with the BRZ. For ~$5K more, making it a sedan (or "4 door coupe") would make it a viable to a much wider audience without killing its ethos.

Like Reply
- Hubcap on May 28, 2016
  
  The normal WRX doesn't have the wing. The STI does and there's a wing delete option. Have you sat in the new WRX? I know this is partially subjective but to me the interior is much better than it was and is close to the GTI. And the WRX drives with an eagerness the GTI just can't match. You wouldn't be caught dead in a WRX because of a "cheesy" interior, yet you have no problems with a Civic or a 350Z. Funny that.
  
  Like
Jaeger on May 30, 2016

So they didn't fix the only thing that was wrong - weaksauce motor.

Like Reply

Recent Comments

Lou_BC I've had my collision alert come on 2 times in 8 months. Once was when a pickup turned onto a side road with minimal notice. Another with a bus turning left and I was well clear in the outside lane but turn off was in a corner. I suspect the collision alert thought I was traveling in a straight line.I have the "emergency braking" part of the system turned off. I've had "lane keep assist" not recognize vehicles parked on the shoulder.That's the extent of my experience with "assists". I don't trust any of it.
SCE to AUX A lot has changed since I got my license in 1979, about 2 weeks after I turned 16 (on my second attempt). I would have benefited from formal driver training, and waiting another year to get my license. I was a road terror for several years - lots of accidents, near misses, speeding, showing off - the epitome of youthful indiscretion.
Lou_BC Jellybean F150 (1997-2004). People tend to prefer the more square body and blunt grill style.
SCE to AUX My first car was a 71 Pinto, 1.6 Kent engine, 4 spd. It was the original Base model with a trunk, #4332 ever built. I paid $125 for it in 1980, and had it a year. It remains the quietest idling engine I've ever had. 75HP, and I think the compression ratio was 8:1. It was riddled with rust, and I sold it to a classmate who took it to North Carolina.After a year with a 74 Fiat, I got a 76 Pinto, 2.3 engine, 4-spd. The engine was tractor rough, but I had the car 5 years with lots of rebuilding. It's the only car I parted with by driving into a junkyard.Finally, we got an 80 Bobcat for $1 from a friend in 1987. What a piece of junk. Besides the rust, it never ran right despite tons of work, fuel economy was terrible, the automatic killed the power. The hatch always leaked, and the vinyl seats were brutal in winter and summer.These cars were terrible by today's standards, but they never left me stranded. All were fitted with the poly blast shield, and I never worried about blowing up.The miserable Bobcat was traded for an 82 LTD, which was my last Ford when it was traded in 1996. Seeing how Ford is doing today, I won't be going back.
Jeff S I rented a PT Cruiser for a week and although I would not have bought one it was not as bad as I thought it would be. Pontiac Aztek was a good vehicle but ugly. Pinto for its time was not as good as the Japanese cars but it was not the worst that honor would go to the Vega. If one bought a Pinto new it was much better with a 4 speed manual with no air it didn't have the power for those. Add air and an automatic to a Pinto and you could beat it on a bicycle. The few small cars available today or in the recent past are so much better than the Pinto, Vega, and Gremlin. A Mitsubishi Mirage, Nissan Versa, and the former Chevy Spark are light years ahead of those small cars of the 70s.