Volkswagen Targeted by Federal Trade Commission Lawsuit
It wasn’t so clean, was it?
The Federal Trade Commission filed suit against Volkswagen on March 29, claiming the automaker’s “Clean Diesel” ad campaign was a deception that tricked buyers into purchasing its supposedly eco-friendly vehicles.
By filing the complaint against Volkswagen, the FTC (which can’t levy fines) would be able to seek compensation for buyers via a federal court order.
“Our lawsuit seeks compensation for the consumers who bought affected cars based on Volkswagen’s deceptive and unfair practices.”
The lawsuit is the latest in a biblically long list of legal action being taken against the company in the wake of the scandal.
The court order concerns diesel Volkswagens sold in the U.S. between late 2008 and late 2015, a total of nearly 600,000 vehicles.
According to the FTC, the now-notorious “Clean Diesel” ad campaign pushed vehicles by claiming they were low emission, environmentally friendly and would hold a high resale value.
In its promotional materials, Volkswagen claimed that its diesel engines reduced nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions by 90 percent, when in reality they belched them out at up to 4,000 percent of the legal limit. The automaker’s claim of being compliant with emissions regulations in all states also figures into the FTC’s lawsuit.
The vote that led the FTC to file suit was a unanimous one.
Volkswagen continues to hunt for an acceptable fix for all of the defeat device-rigged diesels, and was recently allowed an extension to a court-ordered deadline. It has until April 21 to unveil a plan on how it will fix, or possibly buy back, the recalled vehicles.
More by Steph Willems
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- Ajla So a $10K+ transmission repair?
- Kwik_Shift_Pro4X I've mentioned before about being very underwhelmed by the Hornet for a $50000+ all in price tag. Just wasn't for me. I'd prefer a Mazda CX-5 or even a Rogue.
- MaintenanceCosts Other sources seem to think that the "electric Highlander" will be built on TNGA and that the other 3-row will be on an all-new EV-specific platform. In that case, why bother building the first one at all?
- THX1136 Two thoughts as I read through the article. 1) I really like the fins on this compared to the others. For me this is a jet while the others were propeller driven craft in appearance.2) The mention of the wider whitewalls brought to mind a vague memory. After the wider version fell out of favor I seem to remember that one could buy add-on wide whitewalls only that fit on top of the tire so the older look could be maintained. I remember they would look relatively okay until the add-on would start to ripple and bow out indicating their exact nature. Thanks for the write up, Corey. Looking forward to what's next.
- Analoggrotto It's bad enough we have to read your endless Hyundai Kia Genesis shilling, we don't want to hear actually it too. We spend good money on speakers, headphones and amplifiers!
Comments
Join the conversation
"biblically long list of legal action" -- nice phrase As I mentioned in another thread on this subject, I've become convinced they're merely spending their 1-month hiatus getting a legal/financial settlement in order. They are probably communicating through back channels to assure it is approved when presented. There won't be a technical fix. And I don't think CA will let these cars stay on the road.
This angle I hadn't thought about before. To date I've only considered making owners (including dealers) whole again. I wonder how many countries have laws concerning deceptive advertising? Volkswagen is in more trouble than I thought, and I thought they were in enough trouble to bankrupt before this suit. Consumers should still be able to bring individual suits regardless of what the FTC does. Nice correct usage of caps in the word "biblically." Too often mis-capitalized, it is only used with a capital letter when makng direct reference to the Biblical document itself.